Comments by "Philip Rayment" (@PJRayment) on "Expedition Bible" channel.

@erniebell1858 "It is because respectable news media requires evidence and not just a mere claim." Given that we have evidence here, how does that answer his question? Or are you referring to the anti-Christian media as "respectable"? "He made the claim therefore his is his duty and responsibility to provide the evidence." Which he did. So your point is...?
3
@memukanofpersiaandmedia2668 "El, means God, God is not a Name," True, but it's often used as a name. My father's name was Bruce, but we called him "Dad", i.e. we used that as a name.
2
@markuse3472 "Ron Wyatt found amazing places and events from Gods word and its history,..." Well, he claimed to. But very often the evidence simply wasn't there. "Everyone knows Gods name is Jehovah." Which, as others have pointed out, is a corruption of Yahweh, or the Hebrew יהוה "Had the Jews of Jesus' day had embraced him,..." Many did. "...when he "returned," namely in 1914." Huh? What does that mean? "...due to not wanting to admit Jehovah's Witnesses may be on the correct path,..." What is wrong with not wanting to admit to something incorrect?
2
@erniebell1858 "The gullibility of religious people who consistently never demand evidence for anything ..." What about the gullibility of atheistic people who never demand evidence for claims that put Christians in a bad light? Like the false claim that "religious" people never demand evidence for anything? I frequently ask for evidence from critics of Christianity and the Bible, and I rarely get any. "I also don't know how YouTubers acquire money on their channels." One way is that it's based on the ads that YouTube runs on their videos. The more the videos are watched, the more the ads are viewed, so the more that YouTube pays them. "Conceivably, the individual (or individuals) is endeavoring to get people emotional by utilizing click-bate videos to enhance their viewership." Yes, conceivably that's the case. It's also conceivable that they are endeavouring to promulgate the truth with facts and evidence. So it appears that your bias is showing.
1
@OKBushcraft "The J sound is around 500 years old." I presume that you mean that the J sound wasn't used until around 500 years ago. "jehovah is a very very poor translation. The Jews added the vowel points of the word Adonai to the 4 letters of YHWH/Yahweh." And when translated into English, got translated as Jehovah, but at the time, J was pronounced as Y. Which it often still is. The name Johannes, for example, is pronounced with a Y sound for the first letter. P.S. I see that you mention the name José, which is another example.
1
@tambinia7777 "Yahuwah is the father's name.. Yahsuwah is his son's name." God has various names, and there are various translations of those name. יהוה is the name that the Hebrew Bible uses. In English, LORD (in small caps) is normally substituted, and Jehovah is used in places, but Yahweh is a better translation insofar as the pronunciation of the Hebrew is concerned. The Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Jewish Scriptures, used Kyrios (Lord) for יהוה. In the New Testament, the authors referred to Jesus as Kyrios, essentially calling Jesus יהוה (Yahweh). That is, Jesus IS Yahweh. The name applies to God, whether that be the Father or the Son. The Son's human name (if I can call it that), Jesus, is actually the Greek version of the Hebrew name (Yeshua) that we call Joshua. That is, Jesus has the same name as Joshua, but Joshua is the English translation of the Hebrew, and Jesus is the English translation of the Greek.
1
@richardbeee "Although Jesus created all this, Jehovah told Him how." Jesus IS Jehovah/Yahweh/יהוה. The Hebrew יהוה is translated in the Greek translation the Septuagint as Kyrios, and the New Testament authors use Kyrios of Jesus. The name doesn't apply exclusively to the Father, but to the Son also.
1
@TAYLORFAN50 No, this channel only covers history, not fiction.
1
@richardbeee I'm not sure what you're getting at, but I wasn't denying that the different persons of the trinity have different roles, and that those roles have different ranks. ALL I was saying was that Yahweh wasn't used exclusively of God the Father, but also of God the Son.
1
@richardbeee "Yeshua would be my brother. YHWH would be His/my/our Father." In a sense, yes. In another sense, no, given that Jesus IS God, our Creator.
1