Comments by "Christos P" (@JohnCarterIsMyName) on "James Carville Hits New Low: Why Sympathize With Cuba Or Venezuela?" video.

  1. @Edilio A .. You left the United States off the list. Why?
    8
  2.  @doctorthirteen5727  .. Gun control legislation, violence against women's act, 1700 Russian nukes deactivated, most diverse admin in US govt history up to that date (women, minorities, etc), protected more US govt lands from development. And the good economy which had the biggest increase in household income in decades. All this with a republican controlled house.
    5
  3. You need serious help. Carville is correct. Neither govt would take US aid nor would Americans support US troops in either country. In Cuba, congress would have to declare a war and US troops would have to fight Cuban troops on a small island where civilians would be in the combat zone. There is no legal justification for US troops in Haiti at the moment. It would be an illegal action for which the US would be held accountable.
    3
  4.  @LonerWeirdo  .. No one said anything about loans or trade deals. Try again LIGHTWEIGHT
    2
  5. The Clinton years went well since they proved to be a reason to vote for Obama after the 2nd worst president.
    2
  6.  @stevebrown8062  .. Carville didn't handle the Hillary Clinton campaign Try again LIGHTWEIGHT
    2
  7. ​ @Junebug89  .. FALSE. GLB did not cause the great recession. Republican senator Phil Gramm Phd Economics' amendment to the CFMA caused the Great Recession. Phil Gramm would not allow the CFMA to come to the floor for a vote in the senate without an Amendment that banned the govt from regulating all new financial instruments. How do you know to veto a bill for something that does not exist at the time of signing? YOU DON'T Phil Gramm created the vehicle for the derivative market to topple the world banking system. Republican senator Phil Gramm PhD Economics owns the 2008 world banking collapse.
    2
  8. ​ @Asher8328  = Someone too young to know how govt used to work before 2020 NAFTA was Bush41's deal. President's sign bills passed by the congress even if under the prior president. NAFTA was also a good national security deal for the United States. PNTR I do agree was a bad idea. Ok you got 1. clap clap clap. The 2008 world banking collapse would have happened even if Glass-Steagall remained in place. Republican senator Phil Gramm's amendment to the CFMA that banned the govt from regulating the derivative market caused the world banking collapse. The 1994 crime bill was a good thing. The 1994 Crime Bill did NOT increase mass incarceration. Mass incarceration took off under Nixon then skyrocketed under Reagan. Your Trump University degree FAILED you again
    2
  9.  Officer Meow  .... Your Trump University degree FAILED you again.
    2
  10.  Officer Meow  ... I didn't say you had anything in common with Trump. I said you were poorly educated. I like my own comments since it bothers internet GEE_S like yourself so much. GOTCHA !!!
    2
  11. ​ Officer Meow  ... PhD+JD Georgetown. 1) Thank you for proving you don't know American history where a president will sign bills that were negotiated or passed during the former president's term. 2) NAFTA was good for America's national security. 3) NAFTA was a net plus economically for America. Yes. You are poorly educated.
    2
  12. Except Carville is correct and Bernie is wrong again
    2
  13. BULL .... Carville knows what he is talking about. Try again LIGHTWEIGHT
    2