Comments by "Eryk" (@TheEryk03) on "2022 Audi RS3 vs Mercedes-AMG A45 S: HEAD TO HEAD | Auto Express 4K" video.

  1. RS3 is better in almost every aspect. And the most i portent one which is engine is miles ahead. This magazine was alweys very biased. If someone say that 4 cylinder sounds better than inline 5 then you see exactly what BS this magazine is.
    11
  2.  @rforracing  yeah performance is the one aspect in RS3 is better. Even if it have less power. But that's not all.
    4
  3.  @grasak1594  so what? Still RS3 is the record holder. If Mercedes know that their A45s is faster then they also would do factry record just like with AMG GTR.
    4
  4.  @grasak1594  not 7:40 but 7:35 and sports auto lap times have no sense, they do to much mistakes. You know nothing about cars.
    4
  5. How bad must be Mercedes then if rebadged VW is better than Mercedes.
    4
  6.  @grasak1594  it is faster. If it wouldn't then Mercedes would do their of factory lap record. BTW sport auto sucks. They can't even drive. All their lap times have no sense. I have better magazine test from Quattroruote. Hot laps at Vairano: RS3 sportback 1:24.895 A45S 1.25.315 Both tested the same day.
    2
  7. Naah not necessarily, they are alredy guys that do track times in RS3 and they are very impressed by how it handle.
    2
  8.  @grasak1594  so if magazines make so much mistakes that they do 15 seconds slower then what is the point to compare those times? If the spread can be so big then there is no sense to even use it... Its not that every lap is 15 seconds off the potential, some laps can be 5 seconds some 20 sec. So if some car A in their test is 10 sec slower compared to car B then it can be that Car B is actually 5 sec faster than Car A.
    1
  9.  @Peterhaynes  I bet that you are the one that belive in pantemic propaganda and you are deadly afraid of Covid. This magazine was alweys very biased.
    1
  10.  @Peterhaynes  of course it's great. Almost every media are biased and this topic isn't even necessary. People have their own opinions.
    1
  11.  @grasak1594  no, this was head to head comparison test on wet track done by Quattroruote. And the RS3 was better in every aspect, check on their you tube channel.
    1
  12.  @grasak1594  they show all the performance data they did and the hot lap times and they say that it was on wet track... Watch it ones again but now with understanding. They tested those cars very strictly.
    1
  13.  @grasak1594  from 9 min
    1
  14.  @Amarjit_Singh  because they can't.
    1
  15.  @Amarjit_Singh  they can't if they would do they would do.
    1
  16.  @Amarjit_Singh  prove it taht those cars can do some lap records.
    1
  17.  @Amarjit_Singh  the prove that they can't is that they don't do it. And you have not any prove that they can. In every of those categories are faster cars Senna- GT2 RS. GTA M- jaguar XE SV M5 CS- Panamera M2 CS- RS3
    1
  18. @UC2UJkWhBXvPhPHwTpBUbH1A Sport Auto use pro drivers that won 4 times 24h of Nurburgring.
    1
  19.  @grasak1594  man you can't even use proper times...  You said that sport auto times are about 15 seconds of the factry times. So if magazines make so much mistakes that they do 15 seconds slower then what is the point to compare those times? If the spread can be so big then there is no sense to even use it... Its not that every lap is 15 seconds off the potential, some laps can be 5 seconds some 20 sec. So if some car A in their test is 10 sec slower compared to car B then it can be that Car B is actually 5 sec faster than Car A.
    1
  20.  @cazantrabant519  that "true sports car" got beaten by RS3 by 7.5 sec at Nurburgring lol ;)
    1
  21.  @cazantrabant519  M2 CS is 2 yo.
    1