Comments by "" (@bdinaz) on "Captives’ killings, ongoing mass protests will still not impact outcome of Gaza war: Analysis" video.

@fan.80s_90s yup. Being censored here as well.
4
@MansMan42069 replies Being censored.
2
@sheep.herder sadly my opening statement about the folly of believing in such a thing as the directive in question keeps getting censored.
2
The Law of Land Warfare is quite clear that prisoners must be held in a safe, marked location to prevent just this type of situation. Ohhhh. Also, it is totally illegal to take hostages in the first place. So the Hammys are 0 for 2 in the legal arena.
2
@kuchojoe500 There is a difference in taking lawful and unlawful combatants off the battlefield as legitimate prisoners of war, And sweeping civilians up off the streets. Or in this case as concert goers for the purpose of ransom. The first is legal, the second is illegal.
2
@ca-ku1ql Agreed. The IDF has followed the LoLW since the establishment of the state of Isreal in 1948. Not perfectly of course as it is tough to do The Hammys, Hezzies, Hoots, and PIJons have made no effort to follow the LoLW since then.
2
@mohammedxzadoali So you have a racial beef?
1
@lordvader3425 in the west we have been taught to not see people by racial category. Not so in the middle east....
1
@lordvader3425 sadly apparently not.
1
@MansMan42069 And The Hammies? Are they pariahs for their unwillingness to follow the LoLW?
1
@MansMan42069 are the hammy terrorists pariahs?
1
@Transformers-oe5jj I am amused when people throw out the term "Hannibal Directive" as some sort of magical fiat that insulates the Hammys from the murder of innocent concert goers. It does not. A.) The Hammys attacked wearing civilian clothes in order to sew confusion instead of their snazzy green battledress uniforms. B.) Eyewitnesses at the concert state the Attack started with the hammys firing RPGs to try and stun the crowd. They then began firing upon thise who fled with small arms. C.) One of the criticisms of the IDF was that it was too slow to get forces to the concert area before the hammys began their withdrawal. D.) The key testimony being used by the Pallys seems to stem from an IDF Tank commander who stated in an interview that he fired upon light pickup trucks moving back into Gaza following the attack. He made the plausible assumption that the people in the trucks in civilian clothes were Hammys withdrawing. Without uniforms it was impossible to determine if they were Hammys or civilian hostages. E.) Autopsies from the concert goers show the common cause of death stemmed from RPG fragmentation and small arms fire. This coincides from the testimony of the early
1
@SadaK-tr6dm I am amused when people throw out the term "Hannibal Directive" as some sort of magical fiat that insulates the Hammys from the murder of innocent concert goers. It does not. A.) The Hammys attacked wearing civilian clothes in order to sew confusion instead of their snazzy green battledress uniforms. B.) Eyewitnesses at the concert state the Attack started with the hammys firing RPGs to try and stun the crowd. They then began firing upon thise who fled with small arms. C.) One of the criticisms of the IDF was that it was too slow to get forces to the concert area before the hammys began their withdrawal. D.) The key testimony being used by the Pallys seems to stem from an IDF Tank commander who stated in an interview that he fired upon light pickup trucks moving back into Gaza following the attack. He made the plausible assumption that the people in the trucks in civilian clothes were Hammys withdrawing. Without uniforms it was impossible to determine if they were Hammys or civilian hostages. E.) Autopsies from the concert goers show the common cause of death stemmed from RPG fragmentation and small arms fire. This coincides from the testimony of the early
1
@SadaK-tr6dm being Censored Freedom of speech is feared in the third world.
1
@SadaK-tr6dm ow, I am amused when people throw out the term "Hannibal Directive" as some sort of magical fiat that insulates the Hammys from the murder of innocent concert goers. It does not. A.) The Hammys attacked wearing civilian clothes in order to sew confusion instead of their snazzy green battledress uniforms. B.) Eyewitnesses at the concert state the Attack started with the hammys firing RPGs to try and stun the crowd. They then began firing upon thise who fled with small arms. C.) One of the criticisms of the IDF was that it was too slow to get forces to the concert area before the hammys began their withdrawal. D.) The key testimony being used by the Pallys seems to stem from an IDF Tank commander who stated in an interview that he fired upon light pickup trucks moving back into Gaza following the attack. He made the plausible assumption that the people in the trucks in civilian clothes were Hammys withdrawing. Without uniforms it was impossible to determine if they were Hammys or civilian hostages. E.) Autopsies from the concert goers show the common cause of death stemmed from RPG fragmentation and small arms fire. This coincides from the testimony of the early
1
@SadaK-tr6dm by the numbers. 1. I am amused when people throw out the term "Hannibal Directive" as some sort of magical fiat that insulates the Hammys from the murder of innocent concert goers. It does not.
1
@SadaK-tr6dm A.) The Hammys attacked wearing civilian clothes in order to sew confusion instead of their snazzy green battledress uniforms.
1
@SadaK-tr6dm B.) Eyewitnesses at the concert state the Attack started with the hammys firing RPGs to try and stun the crowd. They then began firing upon thise who fled with small arms.
1
@SadaK-tr6dm C.) One of the criticisms of the IDF was that it was too slow to get forces to the concert area before the hammys began their withdrawal.
1
@SadaK-tr6dm D.) The key testimony being used by the Pallys seems to stem from an IDF Tank commander who stated in an interview that he fired upon light pickup trucks moving back into Gaza following the attack. He made the plausible assumption that the people in the trucks in civilian clothes were Hammys withdrawing. Without uniforms it was impossible to determine if they were Hammys or civilian hostages.
1
@SadaK-tr6dm ow, I am amused when people throw out the term "Hannibal Directive" as some sort of magical fiat that insulates the Hammys from the murder of innocent concert goers. It does not.
1
@SadaK-tr6dm E.) Autopsies from the concert goers show the common cause of death stemmed from RPG fragmentation and small arms fire. This coincides from the testimony of the early
1
@SadaK-tr6dm fear of free speech.
1
@SadaK-tr6dm I am saddened when people throw out the term "Hannibal Directive" as some sort of magical fiat that insulates the Hammys from the murder of innocent concert goers. It does not.
1
@EloiseB2025 Simple. Example: The Hammys are operating in building A next to Market B. They are wearing civilian clothes instead of required uniforms. They also have not evacuated civilians from building A or Market B because they seek to make it harder on the IDF to target and engage the Hammys. The IDF takes fire from Building A and responds with overwhelming force. Both hammys and civilians are now in Jeopardy.
1
@EloiseB2025 in order to get my comments to stick i have to break them up into single sentences and number them so they can be read in order. If the are presented in paragraph form the are deleted. Even so I usually have to rephrase the sentences multiple times to make the stick. That is censorship.
1
@fan.80s_90s You know, I am amused when people throw out the term "Hannibal Directive" as some sort of magical fiat that insulates the Hammys from the murder of innocent concert goers. It does not. A.) The Hammys attacked wearing civilian clothes in order to sew confusion instead of their snazzy green battledress uniforms. B.) Eyewitnesses at the concert state the Attack started with the hammys firing RPGs to try and stun the crowd. They then began firing upon thise who fled with small arms. C.) One of the criticisms of the IDF was that it was too slow to get forces to the concert area before the hammys began their withdrawal. D.) The key testimony being used by the Pallys seems to stem from an IDF Tank commander who stated in an interview that he fired upon light pickup trucks moving back into Gaza following the attack. He made the plausible assumption that the people in the trucks in civilian clothes were Hammys withdrawing. Without uniforms it was impossible to determine if they were Hammys or civilian hostages. E.) Autopsies from the concert goers show the common cause of death stemmed from RPG fragmentation and small arms fire. This coincides from the testimony of the early eyewitnesses.
1
@fan.80s_90s ow, I am amused when people throw out the term "Hannibal Directive" as some sort of magical fiat that insulates the Hammys from the murder of innocent concert goers. It does not. A.) The Hammys attacked wearing civilian clothes in order to sew confusion instead of their snazzy green battledress uniforms. B.) Eyewitnesses at the concert state the Attack started with the hammys firing RPGs to try and stun the crowd. They then began firing upon thise who fled with small arms. C.) One of the criticisms of the IDF was that it was too slow to get forces to the concert area before the hammys began their withdrawal. D.) The key testimony being used by the Pallys seems to stem from an IDF Tank commander who stated in an interview that he fired upon light pickup trucks moving back into Gaza following the attack. He made the plausible assumption that the people in the trucks in civilian clothes were Hammys withdrawing. Without uniforms it was impossible to determine if they were Hammys or civilian hostages. E.) Autopsies from the concert goers show the common cause of death stemmed from RPG fragmentation and small arms fire. This coincides from the testimony of the early
1
@uphill248 al Jazeera is deleting comments that contradict tbem.
1
@sheep.herder which is why you will never measure up as a combatant.
1