Comments by "MeTube - tacticalvote co uk" (@OneAndOnlyMe) on "Richard J Murphy"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
We elect a government to do stuff for us. Let's say the stuff is estimated to cost £1,000,000.
The government gets on with it and does the stuff by printing £1,000,000 of money (central bank loan) that never existed to pay for the stuff we want.
The government then invoices us (taxation) in, say, installments of £100,000 a year.
We pay the invoice in installments (our taxes).
After ten years, our invoice payments cancel out the £1,000,000 loan of money from the central bank. (BoE destroys actual money, or deletes a cell in spreadsheet.)
We are left with infrastructure assets or a public services worth £1,000,000.
Would that be right?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Partly true as yes, Starmerism is a centrist party like Cameron Osborne. The misconception is that it only benefits the rich. If you have some money, in a modest amount, you can benefit from investor friendly policies. Cameron Osborne benefited many middle income classes families too, not millionaire, but the "hundred-thousandaires".
The lower income classes, can never benefit from investment driven wealth building simply because they never have any spare money each month to save and invest. The only solution to that problem is to raise the minimum wage, but then the supermarkets will react by raising prices, nullifying the increases to minimum wage, putting low income families back to square one. Solve the "minimum wage/inflation loop" problem, and only then the lower income families can win. This is why anti price gouging policies might be needed to prevent supermarkets (the providers of basic essentials) from taking advantage of improvements to lower incomes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1