Comments by "DrScopeify" (@drscopeify) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1. 16
  2. ​ @slaterslater5944  ​ The Police in the USA has nothing at all to do with the comment that MikuChan wrote. It is not very nice to hijack someone else's comment I will just have you know that the USA is a very big country and only a small part of the USA actually has a local Police force and so many areas of the USA can be a bit lawless or permit organized crime to operate freely which links American cities directly with the drug networks of Mexico and South American countries. This is a very unique situation and is nowhere to be found in Europe. A lawless Narco-state on the border, large land area that is nearly impossible to enforce laws and prevent illegal activity, a similar situation in Brazil. Keep in mind that in the USA there are 239 Police for every 100,000 people while in Germany it is 336 and in France 442 so the USA just has a lack of Police due to the size of the country and the idea of limited Government power which is part of the Public vs Private discussion as TIK discussed in the video. Here in the USA there is the idea of accountability of the Public to the Private citizen which is why Americans vote for local Judges instead of appointment from above as is common in Europe. Also, the USA is a Republic and so local changes are voted on by the local population, sure, sometimes it can be petty like the lighting on my street was polled if it should be converted to LED or not and what color, white or yellow light but this is part of being in a Republic and accountability for the Public/Government. For example many USA states wanted to legalize Weed and so state by state the Private citizens ordered a Vote regardless of the wishes of the State/Public voted in to place a law to legalize Weed based from the power of the Private person voting for it to be so. This is the balance of Power in the USA as a fully functioning Republic via Democratic system, as in: the majority wins the Republic vote. This is 2 systems working together for the better of society with no Politics or Politicians involved at all. What we call "We the People" we have the power to change the laws.
    12
  3. 11
  4. 9
  5. 7
  6. 6
  7. 6
  8. 5
  9. 4
  10. 4
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 4
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 3
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. Chamberlin saved Hitler out of fear of war and wanting to avoid it but as a result of giving in, he only delayed war and created apatite for war by Hitler. Sometimes peace requires threats and not backing down which is the American policy today on Ukraine. Russia claims that eastern Ukraine belongs to Russia due to ethnicity of people living there but that is not much different than Hitler claims for Czechoslovakia in 1938 that German nationals living there should be in Germany. Does France demand lands be handed over of parts of Belgaum that speak French and are of French Heritage? NO! France would never ever demand to take control of that land, the world is different today countries are made of many cultures and no one country can demand control of land due to the ethnicity of people living there. There are Hungarians in Ukraine, is Hungary demanding those lands be handed over? NO. Does Germany demand land with German nationals be handed back from Poland? NO! The world does not work like this in 2021 but Putin thinks it does and that is very backwards thinking. Crimea was a step back in to old world thinking and the west is holding firm against Putin and keeping him accountable for that action and never negotiate with such a person. The west standing up to Putin will prevent future war in Europe. I have no doubt if the west would sign a paper allowing Putin to take eastern Ukraine, that would lead to unstoppable apatite by the Russian army leadership for more and more war. For the safety of all of Europe and Russia as well the west must never back down to Putin.
    2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. The problem with Socialism more than any of it's endless list of flaws is that simply it cannot adapt to the cyclical nature of humanity. There are always cycles to society, world economy and order and Socialism is simply unable to adapt to these changes, Governments can NEVER reduce their size only grow larger and larger, by it's most fundamental form, Socialism is unable to shrink. Capitalism, companies, private pocket books can all shirk during hard times and reduce expense, to pay off debts to leverage against increase risks in the environment but Socialism can do NONE of this. This is why the Soviet Union collapsed it could not shrink during a global recession that occurred in 1990 and lost control and collapsed. Recessions occur to Communist nations, Socialist nations it is a human nature and unless the system of state can adjust then it will fail too. Capitalism will force bad preforming companies, stores and individuals to fail and make way for new development or people with opportunities to expand in their place, Socialism offers none of this, it is inflexible dead end and will eventually fail. Every country that boasts about Socialist programs is funding them using Capitalist systems or else it would end up like Venezuela and that could still happen in the future. Unfunded Social programs are stifling western economies and could in the future risk global stability and economies once again due to the failures of Social programs inability to shrink their sizes to account for a changing human environment.
    1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1