Comments by "DrScopeify" (@drscopeify) on "Karl Marx's Anti-Semitism" video.

  1. Some of the biggest enemies of Jews are Secular non believing Jews for example the anti Israel origination BDS is run by many Jews and they seek to destroy the economy of Israel by banning countries from working with companies in Israel for example. Just because Karl Marx has Judaism by heritage does not mean he was not anti Semitic
    2
  2. I have a feeling that Hitler and Putin would have gotten along too, Putin demanding to unite Russian speaking/Slavic people from his sovereign neighbors in Georgia and Ukraine and Moldova is very similar to Hitler's quest to unify German people of Denmark, Czechia, Poland, Austria against their will.
    1
  3.  @dpag  Hitler saw race based on his perceived distorted view of achievements, his own book, MK, in ink states that Jews never had their own country so they are not developed people. If Jews did have their own country like they do today, would he have murdered 6 million Jews? It's hard to know. It was all in one man's head... However, he did like Nationalistic world leaders that only cared about their own country like Mussolini and the Ottoman's so I am sure he would have also been close to Putin regardless of genetics.... Hitler was a racist but the race was based on his view of the people in power representing the race at the time.
    1
  4. Religion does not tell you what job to do, it does not make you a salve, it creates structures of society, to try and make you a good quality person, upcasting person in society, it creates a system to fight crime and legal structure before modern legal systems existed and it creates a community so people feel united together, to make friends and prevent fights and disagreements. Religion is a tool for creating a community, today maybe we replaced it with the internet but people who are on the internet allot tend to lack in person community and so religion is still a strong option for meeting good, quality people, making friends and so on by going to Church.
    1
  5.  @lordvonmanor6915  I am not a very religious person at all so I am not saying what I am doing I just know that when I do go you can see the community come together and that is more important than the religion itself in todays world. People lack community so religion creates the structure for it but does not mean you need to believe in it
    1
  6. You are wrong, so very wrong! Worldly Jew means Orthodox Jew, as in the Jews mostly living in Poland and Eastern Europe who dedicated their lives to the religion, they don't care about money because their world does not involve money. Marx was excluding them by using the phrase "Worldly Jew" today most of the Orthodox Jews in Israel do not go to work so when Marx says he is not talking about Wordily Jews he means that he is not talking about what today are Orthodox Jews. Simple. The Jews of London where Marx was living, the businessmen Jews, the wealthy and successful Jews in banking, lawyers, store owners, business owners, the "EVERY DAY" or Secular Jew that is what Marx is talking about, 70% of Jews in Europe were secular Jews. Marx lead to the death of millions of Jews in the hands of Adolf Hitler. Your denying of the great evil in the words of Karl Marx is following a long linage of people who are in denial about Karl Marx and his own hand in the holocaust. This denial has to end.
    1
  7.  @sethtwc  That was only due to Hitler being in competition with communist, Marxist and Socialist elements in Germany. Hitler was not the only show in town, he did not even have the largest crowds, not at first, it was a progression. Hitler himself said that he is a Socialist and that his world view for the Aryan German people was a Socialist utopia where the Aryan German people did not have to work hard, had a fare share of society, Hitler simply did not get the chance to see his Socialist plans come to reality. If Hitler had won WW2 he would have progressed onwards to his Socialist utopia > Historian Modris Eksteins argued: Contrary to many interpretations of Nazism, which tend to view it as a reactionary movement, as, in the words of Thomas Mann, an "explosion of antiquarianism", intent on turning Germany into a pastoral folk community of thatched cottages and happy peasants, the general thrust of the movement, despite archaisms, was futuristic. Nazism was a headlong plunge into the future, towards a "brave new world." Of course it used to advantage residual conservative and utopian longings, paid respect to these romantic visions, and picked its ideological trappings from the German past. but its goals were, by its own lights, distinctly progressive. It was not a double-faced Janus whose aspects were equally attentive to the past and the future, nor was it a modern Proteus, the god of metamorphosis, who duplicates pre-existing forms. The intention of the movement was to create a new type of human being from whom would spring a new morality, a new social system, and eventually a new international order. That was, in fact, the intention of all the fascist movements. After a visit to Italy and a meeting with Mussolini, Oswald Mosley wrote that fascism "has produced not only a new system of government, but also a new type of man, who differs from politicians of the old world as men from another planet." Hitler talked in these terms endlessly. National Socialism was more than a political movement, he said; it was more than a faith; it was a desire to create mankind anew.[330]
    1