Comments by "M R" (@MR-xc3sw) on "'BLINKED ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS': Ex-detective predicts when CEO's killer could be handcuffed" video.

  1. Hit man.
    2
  2.  @claude7122  nobody would lead the cops to them by intentionally leaving legitimate clues.
    2
  3. @claude7122  they will never find him , at least not alive.
    2
  4.  @glendagrant484  Because they don't want to
    2
  5. Word is the dead guy was scheduled to testify against a powerful politician for insider trading. If that is true the killer will never be caught alive.
    2
  6. Supposedly the dead guy was scheduled to testify against a powerful politician for insider trading. If this is true he will never be caught, alive anyways.
    1
  7.  @sabaha4637  exactly.
    1
  8.  @Iukereigns3460  it will eventually come out that the dead guy was scheduled to testify against Pelosi for insider trading.
    1
  9.  @bornfree0507  because he was scheduled to testify against a powerful person for insider trading .
    1
  10. Supposedly the dead guy was scheduled to testify against a powerful politician. If that is true the killer will never be caught.
    1
  11.  @claude7122  it's a false trail . Nobody would intentionally lead the law to them by leaving legitimate clues. Nothing about this is amateur. The dead guy was scheduled to testify against a powerful politician. The killer will never be caught, not alive anyways.
    1
  12.  @claude7122  the dead guy was scheduled to testify against a powerful politician.
    1
  13.  @claude7122  the dead guy was scheduled to testify against Pelosi for insider trading, well he won't be testifying now will he !
    1
  14.  @claude7122  the dead guy was scheduled to testify against Pelosi for insider trading.
    1
  15.  @claude7122  the dead guy was scheduled to testify against Pelosi for insider trading.
    1
  16.  @claude7122  the dead guy was scheduled to testify against Pelosi for insider trading.
    1
  17. @claude7122  the dead guy was scheduled to testify in an insider trading investigation.
    1
  18.  @claude7122  if you did this you would not leave clues intentionally. Nobody would . A false trail satisfies the public and the fbi has no intentions of finding him .
    1
  19.  @claude7122  BTW I have had ten other comments deleted that explained much more , that pretty much proves to me that what I read and tried to share is correct.
    1
  20. @claude7122  they don't know who he is .
    1
  21.  @claude7122  the dead guy was scheduled to testify against a powerful person. This has nothing to do with Healthcare it has everything to do with insider trading .
    1
  22.  @claude7122  nobody would intentionally give away their motive and risk getting caught . A professional would leave a false trail as is the case here. The writing was unnecessary .
    1
  23. Everyone would have assumed exactly what you assumed without spelling it out . The clues are a distraction.
    1
  24.  @claude7122  wow . How many times have I told you that the false trail was intentional? 5 times at least. The writing was to intentionally please the public and give the investigators a false trail to follow. They will never find this guy at least not alive. Also if the authorities wanted to catch him they would have done so before he left the city. I guarantee the backpack is full of fake clues also.
    1
  25.  @claude7122  I keep trying g to give you the motive but I keep getting deleted. That's proof to me the motive I heard was correct.
    1
  26.  @claude7122  my explanation keeps getting deleted by fb.
    1
  27. @claude7122  most of my comments keep getting deleted. That's how I know what im trying to share is correct.
    1