Comments by "SterileNeutrino" (@SterileNeutrino) on "Dr. John Campbell"
channel.
-
@emmanelson2406 It started in 2014, everybody fopped off Russia while rearming, Minsk accords were disregarded, sanctions were imposed,. Russiagate got invented from whole cloth by Madame Clinton in collusion with the FBI, Donbass Russian got bombarded daily by Ukraine as actual Nazis, complete with Nazi regalia, reigned free in Mariupol and environs, suddenly Zelensky , a construct by Jewish oligarch Kolomoisky and possibly the USA, aka. "The President of Peace" (what him laughing openly as Putin is holding a speech about the importance of the Minsk accords), was talking about nukes, NATO accession was formally NOT RULED OUT (everyone has the right to acceed, but there is no such right in NATO articles), while everybody was talking more sanctions, Russia had enough and took a look see (hasn't even declared war yet, just a Special Military Operation) and then Boris sabotaged the peace talks in Ankara in March last year. This is on the Western tab.
77
-
61
-
43
-
41
-
41
-
29
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
21
-
20
-
18
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Theory: COVID was switched on, people made a lot of money, bought stuff cheap, wrecked competitors, enjoyed their sadism and wokeness, got rid of Trump in the fog of "crisis" (getting the worst and creepiest and most corrupt establishment hack possible), centralized power, tested the biowarfare defense response rolling out scifi-tier treatments in grand style, flexed their psychological attack and propaganda muscle, checked the population herd conformance behaviour, checked how far they could with Stalinesque unpersoning and muscular police action against "illness" (disease is a crime, dontcha know) ... and then COVID was shut down again. Now we are just seeing the denials and stonewalling and delay tactics. This was just a rehearsal for something much bigger that is in store.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
Meanwhile, TheGrayZone has deconstructed "independent SAGE" and shown it to be quite dependent: "The Journalist-Run, Intelligence-Linked Operation That Warped British Pandemic Policy: Presented as an independent voice for “unbiased” scientific advice, iSAGE provided a channel for media spinmeisters, spies and psy-op specialists to influence Britain’s pandemic policy without accountability. Leaked internal emails show members fretting over its unethical methods." ... "Behind some of the most socially destructive pandemic policies implemented by the British government was iSAGE, a shady organization founded by a Russia-obsessed Guardian pundit and advised by spies, behavioral psychologists and media influencers without backgrounds in science or medicine. Founded in May 2020 by David King, former chief scientific adviser to Labour Prime Ministers Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, iSAGE initially set out to agitate for greater transparency around state health policy, while providing “robust, unbiased advice” to the public and government. Yet it rapidly transformed into a powerful, wholly unaccountable lobbying group, aggressively pushing for “Zero COVID” measures."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A great article that should be read: "Systems Thinking 1.0 and Systems Thinking 2.0: Complexity science and a new conception of 'cause'" by Sidney Dekker.
Insights from resilience engineering and complexity science all point to the importance of diversity [not the woke diversity]. Resilience in a complex system is the ability to recognize, adapt to and absorb problem disturbances without noticeable or consequential decrements in performance (Hollnagel, 2006). Diversity is a critical ingredient for resilience, because it gives a system the requisite variety that allows it to respond to disturbances. With diversity, a system has a larger number of perspectives to view a problem with and a larger repertoire of possible responses. Diversity means that routine scripts and learned responses do not get over-rehearsed and over-applied, but that an organization has different ways of dealing with situations and a richer store of perspectives and narratives to interpret them with. Systems that don’t exhibit diversity will be driven to pure exploitation of what they already know. Little else will be explored and nothing new will be learned; existing knowledge will be used to drive through decisions. This has been called a take-over by dominant logic, or group think (Janis, 1982). One of the positive feedback loops that starts working with these phenomena is selection. People who adhere to the dominant logic, or who are really good at expressing the priorities and preferences of the organization in how it balances production and risk, will excel and get promoted. This creates, reproduces and legitimates an upper management that believes in the dominant logic, which offers even more incentives for subordinates to adhere to it as well.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
ChatGPT proposes:
Potential Analytical Methods for "White Clots"
Histological Examination:
Thin sections of the clot can be stained (e.g., H&E staining) to observe cellular composition and structural organization.
This would differentiate between antemortem thrombi and postmortem clots based on layering, attachment characteristics, and cellular elements.
Mass Spectrometry:
Advanced proteomic analysis could identify the specific proteins present, potentially revealing unusual fibrin or platelet aggregates or even foreign material.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM):
This would allow visualization of the microstructure, revealing whether these clots consist of abnormal fibrin matrices, contaminants, or other elements.
Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy:
To detect chemical bonds and organic compounds, offering insights into unusual biochemical compositions.
Genomic or Pathogen Analysis:
PCR or sequencing could identify any viral or bacterial DNA/RNA, ensuring no infectious agents are involved.
Tissue-Specific Immunohistochemistry:
Detecting specific markers like fibrinogen, D-dimer, or immune complexes, which would indicate if these clots formed due to inflammation, autoimmunity, or vascular damage.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wikipedia helpfully explains in an article laden with jargon and pedantic tut-tutting:
> The term "conspiracy theory" is itself the subject of a conspiracy theory, which posits that the term was popularized by the CIA in order to discredit conspiratorial believers, particularly critics of the Warren Commission, by making them a target of ridicule.[59] In his 2013 book Conspiracy Theory in America, the political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith wrote that the term entered everyday language in the United States after 1964, the year in which the Warren Commission published its findings on the Kennedy assassination, with The New York Times running five stories that year using the term.
> In conspiracy theories, the conspirators are usually claimed to be acting with extreme malice.[62] As described by Robert Brotherton:
> The malevolent intent assumed by most conspiracy theories goes far beyond everyday plots borne out of self-interest, corruption, cruelty, and criminality. The postulated conspirators are not merely people with selfish agendas or differing values. Rather, conspiracy theories postulate a black-and-white world in which good is struggling against evil. The general public is cast as the victim of organised persecution, and the motives of the alleged conspirators often verge on pure maniacal evil. At the very least, the conspirators are said to have an almost inhuman disregard for the basic liberty and well-being of the general population. More grandiose conspiracy theories portray the conspirators as being Evil Incarnate: of having caused all the ills from which we suffer, committing abominable acts of unthinkable cruelty on a routine basis, and striving ultimately to subvert or destroy everything we hold dear.
Yes, these people DO exist.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hey, I just heard there are actually two omicron now. From December 7 in the Guardian (nominally left but actually limousine-liberal and worse): "There are two lineages within Omicron, BA.1 and BA.2, that are quite differentiated genetically,” Prof Francois Balloux, the director of the University College London Genetics Institute, said. “The two lineages may behave differently. Scientists use whole genome analysis to confirm which variant has caused a Covid infection, but PCR tests can sometimes give an indication. About half of the PCR machines in the UK look for three genes in the virus, but Omicron (and the Alpha variant before it) test positive on only two of them. This is because Omicron, like Alpha, has a genetic change called a deletion in the “S” or spike gene. The glitch means that PCR tests that display so-called “S gene target failure” are highly suggestive of Omicron infections."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
More on this subject in a Q&A session (in Russian only: https://youtu.be/S2PPfthJUB8 ). A commenter writes (note that I don't think 72h emergency cooling is sufficient to cool the reactor after a SCRAM, so problem. Time to remove Ukrainian artillery from the board with extreme prejudice; I hope bombing Nikopol, from where the shells come, with thermobarics is not part of the contigency plan though)
There was a recent program by Boris Martsinkevich concerning possibility of any serious disaster on ZAES (Zaporoshskaya NPP).
it's in Russian, here's a short summary:
- After Fukushima-1 disaster in 2011, it was checked to be compliant with the new security protocol. There were some things to change, but it was done. Also, there were 2 inspections - from IAEA and Euratom.
- The main containment of the reactors can withstand a direct hit by 20 ton aircraft from above. Side walls are of 70cm thick armored concrete with additional 2cm steel layer inside. Anything less than said aircraft hitting it won't be able to do any significant damage.
- Spent fuel holding pool is under the same containment, where it can't be hit either. If all reactors are stopped, water circulation in those pools is made using energy from reserve diesel generators - according to post-Fukushima protocol they must be able to do so for 72 hours at least - a time for the personnel to arrange for the external energy supply. Plus 48 hours on the battery.
- Dry storage of irradiated nuclear fuel is under another similar containment. Fuel there is stored in certified transport containers. Each one of them can be drowned, exposed to open fire for up to 2 hours, withstand impact and so on.
What IS possible - is the destruction of "open switchgear", in case of which it won't be possible to take out electricity and the reactors will be brought to the hard stop. It's problematic, but that's it.
But the main point is that even if the containment of the reactor is breached, Chernobyl-type disaster with an explosion and wide range contamination is completely out of question in the case of VVER-1000 reactors. Even in the worst case it may be closer to Fukushima - largely a contained thing with 50-100 km exclusion zone.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1