Comments by "SterileNeutrino" (@SterileNeutrino) on "Lipid nanoparticles risk" video.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
A great article that should be read: "Systems Thinking 1.0 and Systems Thinking 2.0: Complexity science and a new conception of 'cause'" by Sidney Dekker.
Insights from resilience engineering and complexity science all point to the importance of diversity [not the woke diversity]. Resilience in a complex system is the ability to recognize, adapt to and absorb problem disturbances without noticeable or consequential decrements in performance (Hollnagel, 2006). Diversity is a critical ingredient for resilience, because it gives a system the requisite variety that allows it to respond to disturbances. With diversity, a system has a larger number of perspectives to view a problem with and a larger repertoire of possible responses. Diversity means that routine scripts and learned responses do not get over-rehearsed and over-applied, but that an organization has different ways of dealing with situations and a richer store of perspectives and narratives to interpret them with. Systems that don’t exhibit diversity will be driven to pure exploitation of what they already know. Little else will be explored and nothing new will be learned; existing knowledge will be used to drive through decisions. This has been called a take-over by dominant logic, or group think (Janis, 1982). One of the positive feedback loops that starts working with these phenomena is selection. People who adhere to the dominant logic, or who are really good at expressing the priorities and preferences of the organization in how it balances production and risk, will excel and get promoted. This creates, reproduces and legitimates an upper management that believes in the dominant logic, which offers even more incentives for subordinates to adhere to it as well.
1
-
1
-
1