Comments by "Triple 9" (@Betta66) on "Trump Gets the Left to Rant About Russia Some More with a Joke to Putin" video.

  1. No evidence? Clearly, you haven't read the Mueller report that explained how Russians interfered in the election to help Trump win. Or listened to Trump's own intelligence agencies who all told him Russians interfered in the election to help Trump win. Or noticed that Russians tried to pull the same exact trick on the French election. Or, you know, demonstrated any kind of pattern recognition.
    2
  2. Jokes are funny. This wasn't.
    1
  3. Etermena You don’t know about liberals? You know you could just, I don’t know, talk to one, right?
    1
  4.  @anselford3753  Triggered much, snowflake?
    1
  5. milcoll73 The emperor has no clothes. Or for that matter, morals. But he does have Kool-Aid. Keep drinking and maybe you’ll actually do something productive for once in your life.
    1
  6.  @thurin84  At what point did I hint at that? You're a conspiracy theorist and nothing more.
    1
  7.  @anselford3753  Says the whiny little bitch whose best comeback would make a five year old cringe.
    1
  8.  @thurin84  It's not truth if it can be easily disproven with five seconds of research.
    1
  9. No, he didn't. Jokes are funny. This wasn't.
    1
  10.  @kilgoretrout6136  No, you thought it was funny. People think The Simpsons is still funny, but that's not the same thing as still being funny. You think you'd be reacting how you are now if this were any other president?
    1
  11. Kilgore Trout And he tried to do more, but Mitch McConnell is the literal worst. https://news.yahoo.com/obama-didnt-act-russian-election-interference-benefitting-trump-090006944.html
    1
  12.  @defendliberty1289  1. "Not only was it funny" (Lie) 2. "It was a successful communication strategy: avoids being pitied (sic) against another foreign leader" Oh, my mistake. I didn't realize sucking his dick on camera was the better alternative. 3. "The meddling charges are invented BS" Trump's own intelligence agencies have told him that Russia meddled in the election, and indeed, the Republican prosecutor appointed by a Republican president's Republican Deputy Attorney General concluded that Russia meddled in the election. So that's another lie. Congratulations, you drank the orange Kool-Aid.
    1
  13.  @anselford3753  You know, I've been told at least once that resorting to foul language means that I have nothing to argue intelligently. Good thing you've never done anything intelligently. Get a spine.
    1
  14.  @abelbabel8484  Thank you for proving my point, Abel. You killed your credibility just like Cain killed your namesake.
    1
  15. Abel Babel Spell properly. Declaring victory is an empty gesture if there was never any actual challenge.
    1
  16. Jokes are funny. This wasn't.
    1
  17. That...that's also what the Russians did.
    1
  18. [Citation needed]
    1
  19. Sarah Haugh I did use Google and other search engines the last time a Styx subscriber told me the exact same thing about Mueller and the uranium deal. I found no credible evidence
    1
  20. The right: Obama was a weak president. Also the right: Trump is undoing everything Obama did? Good.
    1
  21. Jokes are funny. This wasn't.
    1
  22. ocnier Good comeback. Did you get your medical degree from Trump University like every other Styx subscriber?
    1
  23.  @anselford3753  Good comeback, Kevin James. It must have taken the only brain cell you had to come up with that one.
    1
  24.  @adamburger5761  https://www.lawfareblog.com/documents-senate-intelligence-committee-publishes-two-reports-internet-research-agency
    1
  25. ocnier Does not being illegal automatically make something not immoral? Abortion is legal in some states, but I guarantee Styx subscribers believe it’s still immoral.
    1
  26.  @barahng  According to the report, the Russian group Internet Research Agency "used social media accounts and interest groups to sow discord in the U.S. political system through what it termed 'information warfare.' The campaign evolved from a generalized program designed in 2014 and 2015 to undermine the U.S. electoral system, to a targeted operation that by early 2016 favored candidate Trump and disparaged candidate Clinton." https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/5955379-Redacted-Mueller-Report.html#document/ Here, you can see that passage right there on PAGE FUCKING FOUR. And on page 22, it says "By early to mid-2016, IRA operations included supporting the Trump Campaign and disparaging candidate Hillary Clinton. The IRA made various expenditures to carry out those activities, including buying political advertisements on social media in the names of U.S. persons and entities. Some IRA employees, posing as U.S. persons and without revealing their Russian association, communicated electronically with individuals associated with the Trump Campaign and with other political activists to seek to coordinate political activities, including the staging of political rallies." The rest of the section is redacted, but the conclusion that the text that wasn't redacted proves the IRA didn't help Trump win is misleading at best. Also, Comey testified that while the FBI did not get access to the server, the DNC hired a private cybersecurity firm that shared its forensic analysis of the DNC server with the FBI. And nowhere in the report could I find anything that said the DNC hack had no effect on the election. As for why Putin would favor Trump over Hillary, well, you tell me: which one of them openly crushes on Putin?
    1
  27.  @adamburger5761  You're an obtuse asshole who misguidedly thinks it's hilarious to mock liberals for daring to care about a legitimate threat to national security and the very concept of fair elections. Go fuck yourself.
    1
  28.  @oliveeisner8964  I appreciate the courtesy. 1. No, I don't believe the media has ever been unbiased. My problem, however, is that Trump doesn't get to lead the charge against dishonesty in the media when he is a documented serial liar. He is not the lesser of two evils. 2. Remember the Senate election between Doug Jones and Roy Moore? There was an experiment to use social media to influence the election in Doug Jones' favor. Never mind the question of why people like Styx didn't scream their heads off about it - if social media can have that effect on an election, then clearly, it's not "the lamest bone Mueller tossed out." 3 & 4. Seriously? The Epoch Times? Have some fucking dignity. 5. Trump promised to put Hillary in jail. Hasn't happened yet, even though his party controlled every branch of government for two years and he had all the resources and (in his mind) valid reasons to jail her. But I'm sure he'll put Comey and McCabe behind bars soon enough. Keep on hoping.
    1
  29. Adam Burger And you’re obtuse, but your comment shows you’re also a failure at both spelling and geometry.
    1
  30. Jokes are funny. This wasn't.
    1
  31.  @etermena96  Then why am I not laughing? And don't tell me it's because liberals are humorless. If Trump agreed to a Comedy Central Roast hosted by Seth MacFarlane, then, at least for him, that isn't the case.
    1
  32. Sarah Haugh No, I’m not laughing because it wasn’t funny. Trump is to the truth what Chris Brown is to his girlfriends.
    1
  33. Trump doesn't tell jokes. Jokes are funny. This wasn't.
    1
  34.  @sik3xploit  Examples?
    1
  35.  SirVixIsVexed  Do you think establishment Republicans and the alt-right are one and the same? If not, please do not use "liberals" and "leftists" interchangeably. There is a difference between the two.
    1
  36. Etermena What do you mean “what do liberals look like”? There’s no physical trait that distinguishes a liberal from a conservative.
    1
  37.  SirVixIsVexed  They're not plentiful. You only think they are because you call every liberal you don't like a leftist so you can justify ignoring them.
    1
  38.  Rich S  Do you like being the butt of a joke? You act like it isn't a typical human reaction to not want to be the subject of unearned mockery.
    1
  39.  SirVixIsVexed  1. From where I'm standing, it's not like conservative and alt-right accounts are being suspended and demonetized because they refuse to get on board with the liberal agenda. In the case of someone like, say, Steven Crowder, I heard Razorfist describe it as "Crowder got demonetized for calling someone gay, even though the word is in the guy's Twitter handle." Except it wasn't just one time, as the implication might have been. In actuality, it was more like "Crowder got deplatformed for harassing a gay man for two years." I'm sure you have examples of people getting unfairly targeted, but unless they were minding their own business, I can't gather much sympathy. 2. Project Veritas? The group that passes doctored and deliberately edited videos as "evidence"? Yeah, no, I ain't buying that bullshit. 3. Here's what I said: "You only think they are because you call every liberal you don't like a leftist so you can justify ignoring them." When I said "ignoring them," I meant ignoring liberals when they try to make a point about something. I'll give you some examples. I was once told by a Styx subscriber to look up FBI Table 21A, which he said was undeniable proof that illegal immigrants commit more violent crime than native born citizens. Table 21A has nothing to do with immigration legal or otherwise, but when I explained that, he ignored me and kept acting like it was all the proof he needed. Another time, I was told by a different Styx subscriber to look up a documentary called "Everything Is A Rich Man's Trick." He said that everyone who watched it loved it, and that no one had ever successfully refuted any of its points. It had a pretty high rating on iMDB, so I figured maybe he was onto something. The documentary is basically about how a secret society runs everything and we're all being lied to. So naturally, the first thing the narrator said was "We all know the official telling of the JFK assassination is wrong." That confused me. I stopped three and a half minutes in and I explained to the guy who recommended it "Hey, your narrator is contradicting himself. How would we all know the truth of JFK's assassination if we've all been lied to?" The guy then disappears further up his own ass, acting like I had taken the red pill (pro tip: never sell a stupid movie with a reference to a much better one). So when I say "you're ignoring liberals," I mean you're basically talking to yourself and one other person happens to be there who you won't let get a word in.
    1
  40.  Rich S  Debatable
    1
  41.  Rich S  The point isn't that Trump being a liar isn't noteworthy because everyone in Washington is a liar. I distinctly remember people voting for him because they thought he was a Washington outsider who told it like it was. What kind of cognitive dissonance leads his supporters to supporting him even after figuring out he's as dishonest and unethical as anyone else in Washington? As for the DNC shifting, that goes both ways. Do you know how many people there are who started out as moderates and then shifted further right not because their opinion on anything changed, but because it made them more popular? Off the top of my head I can think of Tucker Carlson, Mitch McConnell, and Trump himself. So please don't tell me the DNC would be wrong to shift ever so closer to one end of the political spectrum when the same strategy seems to be working pretty well for you.
    1
  42.  @abelbabel8484  I do. You'll just never accept it because you've already decided liberals don't have a sense of humor. I could tell you the funniest jokes I know and you'd still think I was as funny as a hemorrhoid. But enough about Ben Shapiro.
    1