Comments by "Jason Dashney" (@jasondashney) on "CNN" channel.

  1. Why? CNN does not take a stance here. They are just incredulous that such a rookie is already this famous and they offer a couple of opinions as to why she's bucked the trend. What about that is hard to watch?
    1
  2. And yet most of the comments here are all about how she's an idiot and got owned etc. It's sad that people just want to push their own agenda and don't want to objectively look at what was said. What that first guy did was reprehensible. Is he honestly suggesting that she liked Hitler? Of fucking course not and he knows it. He's just a typical politician using any dirty tactics necessary to impress the unenlightened.
    1
  3. I say she's shedding light on the real ones who are divisive. She left the left because of all the silencing and oppression. She found comfort in the fact that even though she may not always agree with the right, at least they were willing to have the conversation. Lots of people are finding out the parties have switched and now the right is the more tolerant side. It's bizarre.
    1
  4. Is this a taxpayer waste? I won't get into that.
    1
  5. There's a good chance he gets four more years. If it wasn't for RFK, he would win the next election in a landslide.
    1
  6. That's because this woman took it upon herself to actually enter the premises. Trump said no such thing, and he specifically told them all to go home.
    1
  7. Literally incorrect.
    1
  8. Well, that s"hrivelled stump" is most likely going to be your president. Again. I eagerly anticipate more videos of people crying about it. @aboutface7961 
    1
  9. 36 @alanwatterson2850 
    1
  10. This is hilarious. This woman is actually pulling out the Epstein card? Trump was about the only guy who stood up to Epstein. He kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago. If this woman is now a CNN shill, and wants to talk about Epstein ties, let's talk about Bill Clinton. She's a weak person who is easily manipulated. She went to far down on one side, and now she's going to go to equal and opposite. And of course, it wasn't an insurrection. The right wingers showed up to literally try and take down the government unarmed? The people who have all the guns just forgot to bring them? The guy who apparently stage the insurrection tells them all to go home peacefully and somehow he's the bad guy? Good Lord. She is definitely not talking off the top of her head. She was coached for this interview, I guarantee it. She's not talking away a normal person would.
    1
  11. Age limits are ridiculous. That's just trying to protect people from themselves. They are free to vote for whoever they want. Nobody's forcing them to vote for a geriatric
    1
  12. You just had to bring race into it, eh? People say stuff like that as if there aren't millions of poor white people too. Makes no sense. It's just race baiting which is the lowest form of communication.
    1
  13. A proven loser billionaire former POTUS who was also a tv star and best selling author. That's a pretty damn good resume to me. Disliking somebody is a ridiculous reason to call them a loser. I hate Fauci with the fire of 1000 suns but I would never say that he's a fraud, or a quack, because he has legit credentials, credentials I would definitely be citing if they belonged to anyone I agreed with.
    1
  14. Why are there so many downvotes for this? I hate CNN with a passion, but I saw nothing wrong with this segment. Judge this for what it is, not for how you feel about CNN in general. update: I wrote that 1/2 way through. The whole second half was just continuing the agenda of how bad the police are. FFS there has been tons and tons of coverage about that. Did they really need to make this story about that too? Obviously it's somewhat related because of the heightened animosity recently to context is important, but they are just so blatant about how they want to push and agenda as opposed to reporting facts. CNN just can't bring themselves to do a 10 minute piece on a police shooting without making the police the bad guys even if they were the victims, eh? Fuck CNN. Downvote from me too.
    1
  15. Agreed 100%. This applies absolutely always.
    1
  16. WTF!?!?!?! 6:45 is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard. John is insisting that Vivek has very firm opinions on things he knows nothing about, and that's his comment right after being shown a video where Vivek says he needs to learn more information before he comes to any sort of firm conclusion. Anybody who listens to this CNN garbage and thinks it's trutworthy information shouldn't be able to vote.
    1
  17. Shaking hands with someone is bad now? I simply can't understand why people were upset that Trump tried to open up diplomatic relations with enemy states. That's exactly what we should be doing. Play nice and try to win people over instead of having press, conferences, and calling them evil. What possible good can come out of publicly calling another world leader evil? Do you think they're gonna realize they were wrong and start being friendly or do you think that's gonna stiffen their resolve and make them even more dangerous? People like you actually want the conflict. You want to feel righteous indignation if you truly live for the conflict. Trump was the only recent president who didn't get the country involved in new wars. Hillary Clinton never saw war she didn't like. If she was Republican, you guys would be calling her out like she's an evil warmonger.
    1
  18. What are you talking about? Vivek said that he needs more information before coming to a firm conclusion. That's the very definition of a sensible answer to such a serious question. The comment section is acting like he made definitive statements that were incorrect. If he did, please quote it.
    1
  19. I 100% agree, and I won hundred percent think that his opinion on whether Putin is a war criminal or not it's completely irrelevant. Russia is not going to invade America, and America isn't going to help Russia right now, so what difference does it make what he thinks? It's like when a federal leader gets asked about a state matter, or a particular news story. If it's not of federal interest, then a federal politician shouldn't even be asked the question let alone be hung for his answer, or non-answer.
    1
  20. And he says this right after watching a video clip of Vivek saying that he wants to learn more information before coming to a firm conclusion. How anybody takes any of this seriously is beyond me.
    1
  21. Thank you. Then, again, these people don't care about the law. Just look what happened with Kyle Rittenhouse. He was legally innocent, yet people got angry that he was not convicted. If you don't like it, change the law, don't get angry at a correct ruling.
    1
  22. War criminal is a legal definition. He should not be commenting on that. He can say Putin does bad things, that he doesn't like Putin, but he should not be commenting on legal definitions.
    1
  23.  @bitbugsbyte  Look up what the wealthy pay in overall tax dollars, then tell me you could do without it, and without the jobs they take with them. Having 50 billion dollars is absurd, but the reality is if you chase them away, you'll be worse off for it and that's just reality.
    1
  24. This is the Internet. Logic and reason have no place here. You're supposed to get angry and call people stupid.
    1
  25. So you want America to go into a foreign country and force a regime change? Who's next? Who else should America invade and force of regime change with? People were certainly unhappy when they did that in Iraq.
    1
  26.  @koshka02  I still think invading another country to instigate regime change is always a bad idea, but I really appreciate your answer. I understand where you’re coming from and I don’t think you’re “wrong”, I just happen to disagree with your opinion. It’s refreshing to hear somebody intelligently state their case tho so thank you. I can handle almost anybody’s opinion if they can back it up with actual reasons as opposed to just knee-jerk emotional outbursts. I am now wiser for having heard the most intelligent rebuttal to my view that I’ve heard thus far. I totally understand where you’re coming from but I’m still invoking the slippery slope because history shows us that it’s a hard habit to break, and it seldom works out well when tried.
    1
  27. Thank you! It's like how Trump was criticized for dealing with North Korea. So it's better to sit back and call them evil, like that's going to help? You'd think the lefties would love the idea of diplomacy. If Trump cured cancer they'd say he was killing cancer cells and is evil.
    1
  28. It is usually so cringey when people pull Nazi references, but it's getting less and less so. You can now say one word and get fired and have your life ruined. People are trying to erase history. You are told to believe absolute scientific nonsense. If that's not chilling I don't know what is. Pass me the tinfoil hat because enough things like censorship and a denial of reality have happened that I'm officially nervous.
    1
  29. This is why I don't watch CNN (or any of the tv news outlets). They go all out to paint a picture, then get one single guy who's quite inarticulate to convey the other side of the debate to make it seem like they're presenting both sides. Fuck me this is awful and why if I want news I'll get Wired, The Economist, or listen to hour long podcasts where you can get some context and real information. You know, shit that actually affects me, unlike the president saying the equivalent of "flyover states". Yeah it was crass and he shouldn't have said it, but really it's so far down the totem pole of importance. If the media didn't report it all the time, it wouldn't have been an issue. FFS people, don't get your information from the co-creators of these stories.
    1
  30. I'm not surprised at the comment section. He actually wasn't bad in this talk, but he is an absolutely reprehensible human being who is heavily influencing unfathomable amounts of damage unto the world due to the people at the WEF looking up to this cretin for reasons that escape me. I don't agree with the comment section because he was quite reasonable in this talk so I didn't give it a down vote, but it's the only thing I've ever heard him say that I did not down vote and did not make my blood boil.
    1
  31. And these days there is a strange bastardization of that idea in that some people are being raised to believe they are at the bottom of the totem pole when they are objectively at the top of it. Ivy League students, the luckiest one percent of the 1% of the 1% worldwide are screaming about oppression. They are taught that other people see them as inferior, and that other people are oppressing them. It's setting them up for an unhappy life and then they take it out on everybody else and it creates on happiness for everyone. It defies all reason.
    1
  32.  @meghan42  people are easier to hate when you reduce them to one aspect. Don't get me wrong, I think this guy is an absolute monster, but not because of his religion. I'm actually thankful for this talk because he openly admitted that he was taught that Jews are superior. Lots of people are taught lots of things but they rarely admit it publicly.
    1
  33. 1:31 "there's no evidence...." Hmmmmm, sound familiar? Then he goes off on an editorial. Jesus fucking christ, this is why I don't watch these horseshit channels. They're just editorials. There's ZERO journalism here. Just present facts and let people decide for themselves, you puppet ghost. Same goes for Fox, by the way.
    1
  34. Kids naturally ask big questions. There's nothing wrong with asking questions, the problem comes when we let kids provide the answers.
    1
  35. "controversial" podcast host? He's the #1 host on planet earth and he's only controversial to a minority of people (again, #1 most popular on planet earth). And you guys wonder why nobody trusts the media anymore. Joe has fuck-you money so he can afford to straight up tell Sanjay that the network lies about medical issues, and that it happens under Sanjay's watch. Fuck me, the first 2 things you say are GARBAGE. He's not a skeptic of the vaccines. He said he didn't see a need to take it since he's already had covid, and has said before that he originally was scheduled to take it. He has never, ever told people who were worried about covid that they should not take the vaccine. What a fucking clown show this network is. Holy shit, I'm watching this and now it's the second clip and Sanjay is so gross. He says "we're allowed to have a nuanced conversation about this" while absolutely ignoring Joe's nuanced point. Joe just said that kids fare really well when they come down with Covid. Sanjays says "you mean they don't die?". Fuck you. That is so disingenuous that it's disgusting. Technically what Joe is talking about does include the fact the kids don't die, but you know goddamn well that's not the crux of the point and you're trying to shift the focus because he has you stammering which means he has you dead to rights. Then the next guy says it's like trying to herd cats. You kidding me?!?! He could not have been sticking more to the point. I cannot express to you how little respect I have for anyone involved with CNN. There's zero objectivity here. You guys also happened to ignore the most famous part of this interview which is Joe ripping CNN for blatantly lying. I get your motivation, obviously, but it's still slimy. If I touched CNN I imagine it to smell bad and be sticky. 5:59 Joe was talking specifically about children and healthy younger people. Your data, is it age dependent? And you guys talking about mental gymnastics? C'mon. The very last thing that pencil neck geek on the left says is that it doesn't matter if Joe is joking because the millions of people who watch him may not now. THIS hits the nail on the head of why I hate the mainstream narrative. It's so condescending. You guys act like everybody else is too fucking stupid to understand the things that you understand. Fuck each and every one of you. My God is everything about this video dreadful. Also, to hell with the girl who says Joe is not a doctor. Joe has doctors that agree with him and those who don't, and she isn't a doctor either so that same argument goes both ways. I lost braincells watching this shit show. There's a reason I don't watch any MSM outlet. They are all gross.
    1
  36. If all sides hate her, she's doing something right. I liked her on Joe Rogan's podcast.
    1
  37. So a staff writer for The Atlantic made Asian story about black people? I'm shocked. BAHAHAHAH, he then goes on to say there'll be a bit of an Asian uptick, but a big uptick in white admissions. So he specifically saying he doesn't want more white people there? So he made this a whites v blacks issue. That sounds incredibly racist to me, but that's only because that's literally what that word means. How are these people taken seriously in any capacity? "The educational benefits of affirmative action?" He said white people and Asians will somehow benefit from this? What an absolute fucking clown. And so is anyone who doesn't think that is completely ridiculous.
    1
  38.  @bluewolf5895  You're half right. The wealthy pay the majority of tax overall, but the rate itself is low (at least among the very wealthy).
    1
  39.  @SleepyJames  So I'm a racist if I think people should stop blaming other people for their problems? Not sure what one has to do with the other. Interesting take. Anyway, I'll take the word of a world renowned black economist (who grew up poor in the ghetto btw): “Racism is not dead, but it is on life support – kept alive by politicians, race hustlers and people who get a sense of superiority by denouncing others as ‘racists’” — Thomas Sowell
    1
  40. Ever actually had soy? It's delicious. I can't think of a less masculine thing than being afraid of a delicious plant full of protein and vitamins. Pussy.
    1
  41. So sayeth the man who's clearly judging. Isn't that His job?
    1
  42. Slavery, eh? You go start your own country that takes zero in taxes and tell me how that works out. Everybody is for some of their income to be taken by government to redistribute. Ya'll just argue about the amounts.
    1
  43. Way to set your standard. How people can cast their vote for the "lesser of evils" is beyond me. How do you think we ended up in this mess in the first place?
    1
  44. Because the alternative last election was an even bigger scumbag. People act like his election happened in a vacuum.
    1
  45. Yeah, nothing progresses a nation more than singling out race and make race related policies. That works out well.
    1
  46. "What can be done to redress past injustices?" Absolutely nothing other than education going forward (maybe apart from people who are still alive today that had their land taken). Everybody, and I mean literally everybody in history has a past full of "this army beat that army and these people were killed or forced to move" etc. That's the entire history of humanity. Thankfully it's getting less and less now and all we can do is try to stop it from happening in the future. If you were directly affected then you are owed, but if it's something that happened to anyone from your past, then tough luck. We can't go around demanding compensation from people who did nothing wrong themselves on behalf of people who are no longer around who were screwed over because like I said, that would include all of humanity for all of history.
    1
  47. When was the last time a POTUS tried to tighten the belt? They are ALL money wasting hypocrites.
    1
  48. Yeah but you either have establishment democrats, or the New Kids On The Block who have no real world experience and have ideas that are impossible in a practical sense. You're between a rock and a hard place. Tusli Gabbard is about the only Dem who doesn't sound like she's out of her fucking mind. She's really young though. When she's in her mid 40's she should be solid.
    1
  49. You are saying this to half of a country, for the record. How sad it must be to live life hating half of everybody you see. Lonely.
    1
  50. The word pervert means " whose sexual behavior is regarded as abnormal and unacceptable". Hetero pussy mags are certainly not abnormal or unacceptable since they were titans of print during their heyday and have been replaced by stuff way, way crazier that's now normal, so no, there's no irony there. Just a lack of word definition comprehension.
    1