Nicholas Conder
TIKhistory
comments
Comments by "Nicholas Conder" (@nicholasconder4703) on "A closer look at the New Stalingrad CITY MAP, plus new Stalingrad Schedule (Addendum 7)" video.
23
Myself, I think the first turning point of the Stalingrad campaign was the conference between Hitler, Paulus, von Weichs and Halder. At this point the Germans have yet to commit themselves fully to fighting in Stalingrad (few if any troops have entered the city at this time), yet Paulus is already calling for more divisions to complete the conquest of the city. Halder, when asked about divisions, basically gives the same answer that General Gamelin did in France in 1940, there are none to spare. My reasoning why this is a turning point is that Hitler and the three generals at the conference don't stop, look at the situation, reconsider their options and realize they are overextended (like they were in December 1941 in front of Moscow). Instead, they commit themselves to fighting the attritional warfare both outside and inside of Stalingrad. They had a choice at this point, to realize that they didn't have the forces on either front to complete both tasks and work out a solution to facilitate a return to mobile warfare (perhaps even pulling back to the Don). Instead, they decided to both rob Peter to pay Paulus (transferring 3 divisions from 4th Panzer Army to 6th Army) and reinforce failure.
Fall Blau may have failed at the point you indicated (the meeting where Hitler lost his temper), but I think this is now that the wheels really start falling off the German war machine. Everyone at the conference is beginning to realize things are not going well, but none of them are unwilling to voice their concerns and make the tough choices required to salvage the situation. Thus they committed themselves to attritional warfare. They end up acting like the monkey that is caught with its hand in the pot, refusing to let go of the fruit even though it means he can't get his arm free, and so is trapped.
1
1
1