Comments by "marvin martin" (@marvinmartinsYT) on "LADbible TV" channel.

  1.  @tbrown3356  I waited. Now what?
    1
  2.  @Miike.R  Omg. You are so wrong.
    1
  3.  @tbrown3356  How far away is the horizon. That depends the height of the observation point. As I’ve told you. I can manipulate the horizon by gaining altitude.
    1
  4.  @tbrown3356  Your model? Claims the horizon is earths curve. No. It does not. The horizon is just the horizon. Curve in not implied or suggested.
    1
  5.  @tbrown3356  Your entire model is abstract. We have a model. Where’s yours?
    1
  6. The sun is only 39 miles wide. It is only 3,000 miles high. It’s light doesn’t travel as far as you think. It only lights half of earth.
    1
  7. jdp 90five Here’s a comparison of photos from the 60’s and now https://youtu.be/Z2zpKuBV07c
    1
  8. @Yusuf Best Fucking ghosts? Omg.
    1
  9.  @_61514  Actually he didn’t say that. Looks flat.
    1
  10. jdp 90five Some from a telescope https://youtu.be/fj-P031VlbU
    1
  11.  @tbrown3356  black swan. Bahahahahah bahahahahah bahahahahah. Omg.
    1
  12.  @tbrown3356  Nervous. Omg. That’s grasping at straws. I’m actually laughing at that one.
    1
  13. jdp 90five Here’s footage https://youtu.be/uF14sGoymW0
    1
  14. jdp 90five Here’s one of each planet https://youtu.be/paoB-LxWGhI
    1
  15.  @JulioLopez-uk9qe  it’s the same question. You could’ve answered with a troll yourself if you thought it’s not serious. Like, maybe they have fallen off, how would we hear about that? Gravity is not assumed. It is an effect. One we notice on a daily.
    1
  16.  @JulioLopez-uk9qe  Well yeah. Of course. Falling off doesn’t necessarily mean down. Just off.
    1
  17.  @Veaug  How can our atmosphere exist best to a vacuum with no barrier. I think you mean “next”. Space doesn’t suck like your Home Depot vacuum cleaner.
    1
  18.  @sisi-pr5hq  They can’t conceptualise. That’s the problem.
    1
  19. MrDusant Scientist would run rings around dubay. While dubay ignored every word a scientist said. That’s not a debate.
    1
  20.  @christianlovely1500  You do know of course that a compass from the north won’t work properly in the south right? Guess not.
    1
  21.  @christianlovely1500  You are by far the dumbest person in these threads.
    1
  22.  @jpalmer2785  I need a citation on 50 moons fitting inside earth. It has always been 5. You could fit 50 moons between earth and the moon. All the planets in our solar system including the moons, will fit between earth and the moon.
    1
  23.  @jpalmer2785  Citation required! They have said 5. If you can show where they have said 50.
    1
  24.  @jpalmer2785  Btw I’m not angry. If you claim they say 50. Show me.
    1
  25.  @jpalmer2785  Citation required. You yourself have said “examine the data”. Show me it so I may examine it.
    1
  26.  @jpalmer2785  Citi on required. Can you link it? I’ve always heard 5. Never 50. I’ve had a bit of a look. Can’t find what you’re saying anywhere
    1
  27.  @jpalmer2785  No. That’s not a citation. Need a link.
    1
  28. jdp 90five How many do you require to change your mind?
    1
  29. Toughen up lady. If this give you a headache, you need some self reflection going on.
    1
  30.  @tbrown3356  Wrong. Horizontal lines don’t converge. Nor do vertical lines. Sorry wrong again.
    1
  31.  @Conan-Le-Cimmerien  Actually you don’t need a great distance. Only a few miles will show curve. The horizon for example.
    1
  32.  @tbrown3356  Yes please do try some comprehension Vertical parallel lines do not converge. Nor do horizontal ones. Can you understand this?
    1
  33.  @tbrown3356  Btw. You’re talking “point of view”. Why not just say point of view? Is it because you think perspective has a different meaning?
    1
  34.  @tbrown3356  No. That’s called point of view! From where you are looking to a point in the distance. Point of view. Or a two D image of a three D scene. Which one? POV or 2D?
    1
  35.  @tbrown3356  Dude I’ve been at this topic for over ten years. Point of view doesn’t work the way you claim. Parallel lines on the ground will seem to converge. Vertical ones don’t. Can you explain why they don’t. ? If you can’t, you’ve no idea what optics are. How it works and shouldn’t be trying to school anyone. Here’s another question. What happens to those lines with more height?
    1
  36.  @tbrown3356  Yes I read it. I also looked at the links. Can you explain why vertical parallel lines don’t converge? If not if have no business trying to school anyone on optics.
    1
  37.  @tbrown3356  No vertical lines converging in any of those images.
    1
  38.  @tbrown3356  can you show me your variables? Simple question. You like them it seems. Where are they?
    1
  39. jdp 90five All of them.
    1
  40.  THEY LIVE WE SLEEP  This coming from a guy that thinks “the live” is a documentary.
    1
  41.  THEY LIVE WE SLEEP  Firmament ended with Noah’s flood. Read the bible. Clearly says so.
    1
  42.  THEY LIVE WE SLEEP  Omy
    1
  43. Leo Self That’s way to reasonable of a question for flatwits.
    1
  44.  @satanael9260  Missed that point also ?
    1
  45.  @Babbyfacee  Are awoke? Fucking what?
    1
  46.  @freeman5231  He’s not a flat earther. He’s a globe denier. Big difference. He actually has no idea of earths shape. He is dumber than a flat earther.
    1
  47. God couple
    1
  48. Diviance Flat earth is totally inaccurate on every point they make
    1
  49. Wrong.
    1
  50. Chris Parkhurst Their “science” isn’t science. When they try actual science they fail on a few levels.
    1