General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Bobby Jones
Styxhexenhammer666
comments
Comments by "Bobby Jones" (@bobbyjones8317) on "I Was Correct: Trump Wins Every Poll, But MSM Only Reports CNN Snap Poll" video.
The reason the media cites the CNN poll is because it's the only one done scientifically. Online polls aren't scientific. Anybody can vote and they can vote multiple times. The reason internet polls aren't shown is because they are easily skewed by 4chan internet mobs.
6
Well it's scientific in that it polls actual people. And even CNN admitted there was more democrats than republicans polled, but the specific independent part of the poll said Hillary won as well. I'm not going to take online polls too seriously because like I said anybody can vote in them and they can do it multiple times. When Mtn Dew had an online poll to determine the name of a new Mtn Dew flavor and the winning result was "Hitler did nothing wrong" Am I really going to believe consumers really wanted that for a name? Of course not. It was the work of trolls and internet mobs that come from places like 4chan. And those same mobs are behind Trump. It's a bubble. When you live in the real world and not an internet bubble, it was clear who looked more presidential and whose body language came off as disgusting. There is a reason the betting odds moved more in Hillary's favor during the debates.
2
Well you're right they certainly are more zealous. But I don't think it has anything to do with being more tech savvy, they're just more neety, lol. Real people with real lives aren't going to go out of their way to skew online polls and they can still know just as much about technology. Hillary people and your average voter isn't going to scour the web to skew internet polls. That's something only NEETs from 4chan who back Trump would do.
2
That's a good spin. Although just because most neets are young and most young people are leftists, that doesn't necessarily mean most neets are leftists. "865,000 16-24 year-olds - or 12.0% of all young people aged 16-24 - were NEET in January-March 2016, roughly the same as the previous quarter and down 68,000 from a year before." Losing a percentage of 12% doesn't mean you are losing that demographic.
2
https://twitter.com/MaxOfS2D/status/780654276053983232 Is this not proof? lol Perception and manipulation have a lot to do with it, yes. And the mainstream media is all saying she won. That's the perception the media is touting. The polls have mostly been right, so I don't see how the algorithm-based predictions have failed. And if that sliver of the demographic was never going to vote Hillary anyways then it wasn't much of a loss to her.
2
A lot of undecided voters still get their information from the news media. Yeah they're incredibly stupid people, but they're out there. They aren't invested into the internet. They just randomly tune in to CNN or whatever when it gets close to the election. This reflects in the polling as well. The bad news cycles reflect in the polling. For an entire week they looped Hillary feinting and acted like she was dying. After a week of questioning her emails and foundation and then looping her feinting that's when she went down in the polls. Before that they were showing Trump insulting the Khan family on repeat and that was when he was really low in the polls. So while TV is dying in a lot of ways, the middle aged people still tune into it especially at times like this. And that's who mostly votes as well. The boomers are going to decide this election, not the youth. This is the last battle of the boomer generation before they all begin to die in the next decade. I think suburban women will be the deciding factor and they will go Hillary. I think the election will likely be close and there will be no Hillary landslide unless the polls looked like they did after the DNC. Trump can't possibly have a landslide victory unless there is some kind of massive scandal leaked that proves Hillary personally created ISIS or eats children or something like that.
2
The facebook pages, blogs and youtubers are all usually biased anyways. So it doesn't matter really. Also, these things just speak about what's going on in the news cycle anyways. The main media is the most influential. I don't think youth voters will ever swing right. It isn't about people leaning more right, it's how left leaning people such as the youth are less likely to vote. But the bases of both sides will still come out and vote because as much as Trump fires up right wingers, liberals also hate him and will turn out to vote as much as they usually do to vote against him. It's just the undecided people in the middle that are malleable. I think the debates are enough to sway them and also if they start a bad news cycle. It's going to be tough for Trump when he barely has any ground game. Knocking on doors and reminding people to vote is still effective. Also, it is still negative when you have big members of your own party against you. We all know the extreme right wingers don't care but are the republican leaning independent people still going to show up and vote? Or will they vote Hillary like Bush is doing. And while I think some gigantic scandal would be needed to knock Hillary out, I don't think the final wikileaks release will do anything especially in the context that they've already worn it out to death. If it's just more email shit then nobody will care. Yeah yeah yeah we already know that scandal. There can just as easily be a big scandal leaked on Trump that we don't already know about. Simply finding something already on public record but highlighting it can even be enough to bring him down, such as this miss universe stuff right now.
2
Hillary only needs to win one swing state and she wins.
1
Trump was very low energy. Even he knows he lost. Rudy Giuliani is wanting him to skip out on the next two debates. I wouldn't trust online polls cause literally anybody can vote in them.
1
WRONG
1
Online polls don't represent anything. People can vote multiple times in them and literally anybody who isn't even going to vote in the election can vote in them. There is nothing scientific about them.
1
Citation needed
1