Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. Nope, a "safe space" is by definition where your opposition is banned. A place where everyone gets a voice is the opposite of that.
    47
  2. Those Dem ping pong paddle signs remind me of the signs Wiley Coyote flashes just after he runs off the cliff and before he falls.
    46
  3. "Are they waking up?" Well, they're tossing and turning.
    23
  4.  @daysrcdays  No, he means Chicago. It's not dangerous to travel in Indiana. Most murders in Chicago are done with submachine guns/machine pistols, like the Uzi or the Mac-10. These are not sold to civilians without a special license, in Indiana or anywhere else. So much for the narrative that doing things wrong will work if the rest of the world does things wrong, too. If making something criminally used nationally contraband would keep it out of Chicago, there would be no illegal drugs in Chicago.
    21
  5. For months on live television.
    21
  6. Now he can hold back the rising ocean more conveniently. (Has he stolen Moses' staff from the Ark of the Covenant in Area 51?)
    13
  7. "China has not fired one bullet or launched one rocket to expand their reach." China militarily conquered Tibet and tried to conquer Vietnam and South Korea. They are telegraphing their intention to subjugate democratic Taiwan by force, and they brutally administer their conquests. They will expand militarily wherever they can (unless they can achieve the same results by subversion). They are held in check by alliances led by the US and India. China's silk road initiative has been successful in increasing their overseas coercive power (through client debt). It has not been that great as an economic investment. China is at the peak of an infrastructure and real estate bubble that when it bursts will be worse than the one that hit Japan, because at least Japan's infrastructure was quality made and retains residual value, whereas China's is junk.
    12
  8. When the feds and the state (NY) and the city spend millions and years investigating him and come up dry. When they can't even frame him by breaking the law.
    12
  9.  @peterjermey7235  "@RameyJesusistruth Palestine is not South of Mexico" What does that have to do with our open border? People from the whole world are crossing our southern border, including the Middle East and China.
    11
  10. And the National Endowment for the Arts.
    11
  11.  @terrymcginnis4633  "you know in 2018 he paided no federal income tax right?" If so, that would be because in 2018 he made no money. What part of "entrepreneur" do you not understand? They were saying he would go out of business, if you recall.
    11
  12. " low income defendants." By what measure? Their tax returns? Thugs and gangsters don't itemize.
    10
  13. "They're extending the hearing into July." Anything to keep them off the streets. We don't want them legislating.
    10
  14. "The withdrawal from Afghanistan was just like our withdrawal from Vietnam." A little worse, actually. In Vietnam we got the Americans out, and a substantial number of Vietnamese. Also, we didn't spring a surprise on our western allies.
    10
  15.  @fattymcfatpants9735  "And yet he always welcomes the press wherever he is. Amazing huh?" Yes, and he always calls them out wherever he is. Is this supposed to be an argument that the press is really fair and balanced and not comprehensively dishonest (after they have been comprehensively proven to be the opposite)? Are you now taking Trump's word for that if he said any such thing (which he didn't)?
    10
  16.  @freedom1973  "I can't believe McCain would go on fox after the way they spoke of her father" Where else is she going to get a hearing? Nowadays it's Fox or be silenced.
    10
  17.  @bobbykiefer4306  There are true and false opinions. There are opinions whose truth cannot be verified. Opinions can be true or false like any other propositions, your statement is meaningless.
    9
  18.  @MaxMax-nb1lm  "Now it's Florida's job to cover these costs." Don't be silly, if Disney wasn't SAVING MONEY with the sweetheart deal they had they wouldn't have lobbied for it in the first place. This means they spent less money tailoring the infrastructure to their own needs than they saved with tax breaks.
    8
  19. Because conviction in impeachment to effect removal requires a 2/3 supermajority in the Senate.
    8
  20.  @gen_z_hippichikk  Putin has endorsed Kamala.
    8
  21.  Minute Meditations  They have been abusing their power and trust for a long time, Durham documented and published the fact, and if you deny that I don't trust you, and shouldn't.
    7
  22.  @blex5579  He earned his first money as a kid selling a game he wrote. You don't have a clue.
    7
  23. "60 Minutes" has been doing deceptive editing since the show started in the '60s. They were fake news before fake news was cool. That is the reason for the way they shot their interviews, cut from closeup of questioner to closeup of answerer. They did this so that they could take an answer, or part of an answer, and edit it in after a completely different question make it look seamlessly like a response to THAT question. They did this all the time. And then if you don't want to be interviewed that way it was implied it was because you had something to hide.
    6
  24.  @Yearlinphillips  "oh why would states do better" Because they did do better. Since the DOE was started under the Carter administration and public sector unions were made legal at about the same time, the test scores of US students have steadily dropped and What is the point of adding a layer of bureaucracy to a function that works fine on the state level, other than burning money? We've DONE this experiment, and we know the result, and it isn't good. Pretending not to understand correlation is not an argument.
    6
  25.  @jerrellbevers6071  Is that supposed to be English?
    6
  26.  @adamsinclair007  "They didn’t cheat in the first place, genius." This comment will not age well.
    5
  27.  @PBVader  "ewe toob don't cooperate with links, so here you go." On some channels you can and some you can't. I suspect it is a setting for the channel administrator. Some lazy admins do this to curb linkbait spam. This really sucks because it looks like the post was posted, and it even shows like it did, but when I reload the page, my comment is gone. Because of crap like this, I have to check every time to see that my post took, then sometimes edit the links out of my post and repost. Surely having the posters able to cite and readers able to confirm my data is more important than eliminating some spam links that few people are going to click on anyway, at least if we're going to improve the "He said, she said" nature of Internet discourse.
    5
  28.  @avalerie4467  Sort of a think pit.
    5
  29. AOC is the second coming of Rosanna Rosannadanna.
    5
  30.  @joeblow1942  The Speaker gets a car and driver. Each rep does not. The overworked people mentioned in the speech were THE STAFF.
    5
  31.  @demonkingbadger6689  "bite on command when picked up by strangers." Attack word is "snowflake" for plausible deniability.
    5
  32.  @morenitomoreno1282  Because it's not true. The difference was explained at the start of the video. The protection they get as a "platform" is based on their BEING a platform, and not editing legal speech.
    5
  33.  @Gzoratto  " loans and grants" The government paid him to do something and he did it. That is not freeloading. That's a job.
    5
  34. Everything starts with the rich first. Indoor plumbing. Automobiles. Air conditioning. Computers. Now I (factory worker) have all 4. Thank God our ancestors didn't curb the rich because of envy. Bezos sucks, but not because he's rich.
    5
  35. They were locked out of hosting the debates. It is in the interest of their ratings to treat them as non-events. The Dems shouldn't complain about results they caused.
    5
  36. ​ @theespionageact5249  "please tell me how free speech was violated." In 2020, Congress summoned the CEOs of Google and Face Book to hearings about busting up tech monopolies with action on anti-trust legislation. THAT WAS THE STICK. In the questioning, Republican politicians asked pertinent questions about the level of these companies' corporate power and anti-competitive practices (preventing the overweening burgeoning of corporate power and enabling competition is SUPPOSED to be the point of antitrust law) and expressed concern about these companies' level of censorship (too high). Both in general (in pursuit of governments purpose of securing the civil rights of citizens) and topically (germane to the topic of an antitrust concern of corporations garnering too much power) this was an appropriate line of questioning. Democrat politicians, on the other hand asked the CEOs about their censorship policies, demanding that they sensor MORE. THAT WAS THE BLACKMAIL. That is exactly why this subject was brought up in the context of an "antitrust" hearing. If you are really concerned about the power exerted by "Big Tech", then it is a conflict of interest to insist that they exert more power and and throw their weight around more. Consequently, the "helpful suggestions" from government figures and agencies were coercive, and were meant to be clearly understood as such. Coercing a publishing entity (for our current purpose it matters not whether the entity is a "publisher" or a "common carrier") to selectively remove legal material selected by the government official is a definitive and perfect definition of a violation of the First Amendment. You won't find a more "specific" violation in US history. THAT is why the communiques regarding censorship targets were confidential: because everyone involved knew it was illegal. If there were any room for doubt about this, the threats of government action from the Biden administration and Democrat politicians against Musk and Twitter for reducing the level of censorship removes that room. The threat is explicit, unmistakable, and clearly unconstitutional. Officials of THE US GOVERNMEN are currently CENSORING CITIZENS' COMMUNICATIONS, and at this point are doing so OPENLY and EXPLICITLY. The future of our Republic depends on ending this criminality, among others.
    5
  37.  @nonameissafer.8457  If you think "trump and the GOP" are racist you're proving our point. Yes, it is fitting that misapplying words should tend to rob them of their meaning.
    4
  38. "What's the incentive?" It is not to make things easier or better for minorities, even on the racist assumptions that underlie much of leftist policy making. It is to remove a metric by which the performance of the teacher's union controlled system can be measured. It is to make incompetence and apathy easier for teachers.
    4
  39.  @RAINRDY  It may surprise you to learn that it is legal to speculate about encounters between real persons and fictional characters. And often entertaining and even educational.
    4
  40.  @PhillyLeotardo25  Who are you talking about? There are no illegal aliens in DOGE, all US citizens.
    4
  41.  @zacpreston9771  "Can't they throw them away even of we vote in person???" Not unless they suborn the Republican observers. Old fashioned in person voting has a "chain of custody" protocol designed to prevent selective counting. They can do whatever they want, but they can go to jail for it because somebody is WATCHING.
    4
  42. Congressman cannot be convicted for lying to congress.
    4
  43.  @PeterPeli  "Considering our debt to them?" You are confusing an account payable with a personal obligation. This gives China no leverage. You can call in a favor. You can't "call in" a financial debt. The payment terms are spelled out in advance. If we weren't making the payments, it might be another story. Chinese equity in US native assets is a threat for Chinese hegemony. US and world companies whoring for Chinese trade is a threat for Chinese hegemony. The US's outstanding debt is a threat to our power, prosperity, and future, (because the interest sucks the blood out of our economy and diverts funds betters spent elsewhere) but that has nothing to do with who holds it.
    4
  44.  @tobybigham4196  "access" The grants are AWARDED. Genocide is not a partizan political issue. We can defund the Nazis.
    4
  45.  @homietony5606  Decent folk would be ashamed of the political weaponization of the "justice system". You obviously are not.
    4
  46.  @Notkidding69420  We're not talking emotional support here. Power and legitimacy is supposed to emanate from the people.
    4
  47. It's a debt, collected like a loan shark.
    4
  48.  @barbmelle3136  Probably gated communities.
    4
  49.  @nandy1256  You really don't have a clue what's going on? Anti abortion protesters are being arrested by the feds for protesting across the street from a Planned Parenthood center, and terrorists are literally getting away with firebombing a crisis pregnancy center with Molotov cocktails. The feds are officially opening investigations of parents protesting pornography and sexual indoctrination of minors as terrorists.
    4
  50. @Vlodec The presence of BLANK ballots in the vicinity of a recount is proof of fraud.
    4