Comments by "Digital Nomad" (@digitalnomad9985) on "Fox News"
channel.
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@zoeyjusko7258 " It apparently says whatever people want it to say."
If you're disingenuous enough, ANYTHING can say whatever you want it to say. Protestantism created the modern libertarian west. We (Protestants) implemented religious freedom, political freedom, academic freedom, freedom of speech, freedom of the press FIRST, and thus caused the academic, scientific, technological, and material progress that followed; and most of the rest of the world hasn't caught up with it yet. John 8:32 "You will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.”
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Well, making a big deal out of what they look like would have nothing to do with solving the problem. Making a big deal of what they look like was central to causing the problem in the first place, or hadn't you noticed? In other words, if the Mayors in question in (New Orleans and Chicago) weren't racist in their politics, the problem wouldn't be nearly as bad. Obviously the fallacy of their politics is thinking that you can fight racism with racism. Conservatives are not going to make that mistake, no matter how you groypers try to fool us.
No, we're not "supposed to" forget race. We're "supposed to" fixate on it, and become what they keep insisting that we are. That is their trap. There is no solution to the problem along those lines, that's a canard. Enforce the laws without fear or favor. THAT is what will WORK, and it is, not coincidentally, what is JUST.
2
-
2
-
2
-
"The only thing that matters is what i'm saying is true or is iit not?That's all that i asked in the replies"
This is the first time you have brought that up and for your information it is not true that a racial or religious group is monolithically conspiring against the rest of the world. (And the closest thing to it is militant Islam, which you are helping). Of course, you knew you were blowing smoke, right?
"Therefor i'm assuming you are Jewish."
If all that matters is whether your lies are true or not, why would it matter whether I'm Jewish?
You are attempting to get around having to refute my views by giving what you think is a reason to dismiss them without thought. This is called Bulverism, which is what they teach in schools nowadays in place of critical thinking. Of course, this will not work for you on most readers, because most readers aren't bigots:
Quote from Bulverism by C. S. Lewis:
You must show that a man is wrong before you start explaining why he is wrong. The modern method is to assume without discussion that he is wrong and then distract his attention from this (the only real issue) by busily explaining how he became so silly.
In the course of the last fifteen years I have found this vice so common that I have had to invent a name for it. I call it "Bulverism". Some day I am going to write the biography of its imaginary inventor, Ezekiel Bulver, whose destiny was determined at the age of five when he heard his mother say to his father — who had been maintaining that two sides of a triangle were together greater than a third — "Oh you say that because you are a man." "At that moment", E. Bulver assures us, "there flashed across my opening mind the great truth that refutation is no necessary part of argument. Assume that your opponent is wrong, and explain his error, and the world will be at your feet. Attempt to prove that he is wrong or (worse still) try to find out whether he is wrong or right, and the natural dynamism of our age will thrust you to the wall." That is how Bulver became one of the makers of the Twentieth Century.
Suppose I think, after doing my accounts, that I have a large balance at the bank. And suppose you want to find out whether this belief of mine is "wishful thinking." You can never come to any conclusion by examining my psychological condition. Your only chance of finding out is to sit down and work through the sum yourself. When you have checked my figures, then, and then only, will you know whether I have that balance or not. If you find my arithmetic correct, then no amount of vapouring about my psychological condition can be anything but a waste of time. If you find my arithmetic wrong, then it may be relevant to explain psychologically how I came to be so bad at my arithmetic, and the doctrine of the concealed wish will become relevant — but only after you have yourself done the sum and discovered me to be wrong on purely arithmetical grounds. It is the same with all thinking and all systems of thought. If you try to find out which are tainted by speculating about the wishes of the thinkers, you are merely making a fool of yourself. You must first find out on purely logical grounds which of them do, in fact, break down as arguments. Afterwards, if you like, go on and discover the psychological causes of the error.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2