Comments by "Gregory Wright" (@gregorywright4918) on "Drachinifel"
channel.
-
31
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
25
-
25
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
A good list, Drach, with a couple omissions (probably ones out on loan?):
Battle History of the Imperial Japanese Navy (1941-1945), by Paul Dull
Sunburst: The Rise of Japanese Naval Air Power (1909-1941) by Mark Peattie
The Japanese Submarine Force and WW2 by Boyd and Yoshida
The Japanese Merchant Marine in WW2 by Mark Parillo
If your interest is in shipbuilding, there is a good chapter on Japan in:
Naval Shipbuilders of the World by Robert Winklareth
For individual ship focuses, aside from the cheap Osprey series, there is the Legends of Warfare: Naval series, which has Ahlberg & Lengerer doing the Soryus, Kongos, and Fubuki classes and their derivatives, the ShipCraft books, and the Anatomy of the Ship series.
For "what were Japanese thinking", I would add:
The Pacific War 1931-1945 by Saburo Ienaga
Japan 1941 by Eri Hotta
Japan Prepares For Total War by Michael Barnhart
Fading Victory - the Diary of Admiral Motome Ugaki
I did appreciate Japanese Destroyer Captain by Tameichi Hara, but I thought it needed to be taken with a bit of scepticism, not quite as much as Mitsuo Fuchidas books. Saburo Sakai's memoir was good as well, but he was part of the land-based naval air forces (flying a Zero), not the ship-based ones.
Finally, there are some great battle studies, of which the best recently are:
Shattered Sword: The Untold Story of the Battle of Midway by J Parshall and A Tully
The First Team (2 books) by John Lundstrom
Pacific Crucible (and 2 more) by Ian Toll
Fortress Rabaul by Bruce Gamble
Rising Sun, Falling Skies (and 2 more) by Jeffrey Cox
Islands of Destiny by John Prados
Empires in the Balance (and 2 more) by HP Wilmott
Some of the latter ones focus more on US/Allied actions, but they mix more Japanese perspectives in than books from earlier.
Final question - how do we get a library card for the Drach Collection?
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@rogerwilco2 It's a shame we are so quick to blame everything on "racism" today. Yes, there was underestimation, but it worked both ways - Japanese thought the Americans were "decadent, lazy gaijin" who would be quick to cut their losses and make a deal if they just bloodied their nose a bit - hence, Pearl Harbor. Tokyo's "racism" extended even to other Southeast Asian people groups, particularly the Chinese whom they raped and massacred because they dared to defy the "Children of the Sun".
Regarding the torpedoes, we knew about the British experiments with oxygen-enriching that did not go well. Even so, we should have been able to tell they were using a 24" torpedo to our normal 21" - three extra inches in diameter is going to get you some extended range anyway, and a bigger warhead too. Reminds me of how surprised we were when we got a good look at the MiG 25 Foxbat - steel wings, vacuum-tube avionics, short range and lousy dog-fighting. It looked so much more impressive from a distance.
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8