Comments by "bighand69" (@bighands69) on "NBC News" channel.

  1. The tacks and barrels of the main gun are not heavy steel and a small armoured charge could take that out on a tank. Several hits would most certainly do the damage required. Remember for a tank to be taken out it does not need to be destroyed just made useless and then they will be abandoned.
    1
  2.  @xump4617  Every communist/socialist country that has every existed has created starvation. Capitalist countries are the most success. Capitalist countries are so successful that no body starves and there is a problem with people getting fat.
    1
  3. It is a lovely place but it is no for hardcore political activists that want to fantasy about living in "europe".
    1
  4. All those places are too cold hence why they flock to Florida.
    1
  5.  @thelastmessiah2765  So you think it is conservative rioting on the streets?
    1
  6. But is it conservatives causing the mayhem?
    1
  7. Pure garbage.
    1
  8. In other countries they just get targeted with no ability to defend them self.
    1
  9. That is what happens when you stand around in the dark. The driver may not actually see you.
    1
  10. What about ghosts there are reports on them but no believes in them.
    1
  11. How dare Trump say that about those great countries. They are world leaders in culture and export their culture all over the world for the betterment of all people. I dare he.
    1
  12. Maybe he just did not think about it and was overawed by being in Europe. Just do not know to be honest. Clearly a person should inform the family of where they are.
    1
  13. @Anglo Patriot They are all socialists no matter how they try to hide behind different names.
    1
  14.  @SchmulKrieger  It was democratic party behind the segregation. And it was the democratic party that voted against the civil rights act. Even the democratic party voted against the abolition of slavery.
    1
  15. They could damage tanks as well if it hits the tracks or barrel of the main gun.
    1
  16. Cruz is a constitutional lawyer. Everything he does is in the context of the constitution.
    1
  17.  @roystonmason9125  Trump is the man.
    1
  18. Not easier but most certainly with good manufacturing they could pump out millions of them for infantry use.
    1
  19. Kyiv is not besieged anymore they have managed to push them back. In the south it is a different story but Ukraine would need to be able to hit them from behind to drive them out.
    1
  20.  @JoeyBlogs007  The US more than likely has a sniper drone that can be layer with existing drone technology.
    1
  21. Scramble radar? So who is going to be in the region to make that disruption especially in Russia.
    1
  22. Not an option at the moment. The only way to stop them will be some sort of modern flak system that is automated.
    1
  23. Modern warfare is all about accuracy and being able to get the target at distance. In WW2 they would have been using standard mortar rounds and today they are using drone style mortar rounds that can go out to 40km.
    1
  24. Unless that cod player can actually serve in infantry and be out in the field they will not be allowed anywhere near such a system. It is not a toy.
    1
  25. @Samthewayne They are both constitutionalists. Have you a problem with that.
    1
  26.  @mercenaut  No I sound like somebody that would love the culture to go back to a more decent time. I do not like the current skanky culture being promoted with the media and politics.
    1
  27. Unemployment is now down at 7% and will be near 5% by election time.
    1
  28. Why?
    1
  29. The 300 series is a new type of switchblade that is fit for general service. So far they have been used and experimented by the USMC and became a primary system for Special operations but this will be the first time that it is being deployed like a normal weapons system.
    1
  30. The 300 can still damage tanks with a well positioned hit.
    1
  31. That makes no sense at all.
    1
  32. And when vacuum energy discharges through hyperspace are achieved the drones can be sent back in time. SkinnyCow can you think of any more complicated ideas that money can be wasted trying. I have thought of a machine that would count the grain of sand on a beech.
    1
  33. Artillery is not generally armor plated and can be destroyed or made inactive by such charges. Now automotive artillery platforms that are armour plated would require some sort of armour piercing charge but the actual gun barrel would still be vulnerable.
    1
  34. The probably do have mini nuclear missiles that can be launched form a small system but probably not that small.
    1
  35. And what if they do not know what it is?
    1
  36. He won that is why.
    1
  37. Until one of those little boats is loaded with nasty stuff and attacks but that would be a one time deal with the US response being a hundred times more deadly. Iran better hope that all its operators are on the same game plan and does nothing stupid.
    1
  38. That sort of attack is a one time deal and what would transpire out of this is that the US would saturate the reason and just pick off the Iranians in the region to send out a message. Any other vessel that then tries to make that attack will be shot at ranges the Iranians cannot understand.
    1
  39. If the boat had Iranian flags and even attempted to an attack like that the price that the Iranian navy would pay would be very high. The only thing that saves those boats is the fact they are clearly showing that they are from Iran.
    1
  40. I would would they like long term diving.
    1
  41. Everybody is small to the US as they have a volume of attack that no other country can even attempt. The US would crush any of those nations at sea.
    1
  42. It is free and open waters that Several countries use.
    1
  43.  @zulkanainbaharuddin2185  British Navy can easily stop any Iranian ship. Britain could dominated that whole gulf if they wanted to.
    1
  44.  @zulkanainbaharuddin2185  You can fantasise but UK is still the UK. Royal Navy could clear out that whole section of sea if they wanted to. UK could park one carrier outside and allow destroyers to just travel up the gulf and Iran would be powerless.
    1
  45.  @zulkanainbaharuddin2185  Because the UK does not want to do it but it really depends on what Iran does. If one of those proxy groups that are funded by Iran was to carry out some stupid attack against the UK then it would become a different ball game entirely. Britain has nuclear weapons and a missile system that can allow them to carry out long range attacks but they simply never use them. Britain has a genuine intercontinental missile system that is fully capable.
    1
  46. She is now dead so his nomination will go forward.
    1
  47. No they are only letting them know that next it would be firepower.
    1
  48. Once the US sends a message which they will Iran will back off. None of this has anything to do with Trump or Biden. They did this under Trump until a few messages were sent.
    1
  49.  John Lawrence Wariga  Russian navy is nothing like the US navy. The US could easily target those smaller boats with with a host of nasty defensive tools.
    1
  50. Those small boats attacking is a one time deal. They may get one sneak attack in but every time after that the US would be targeting every small boat and not allowing them within a few hundred yards.
    1