Comments by "s H" (@sH-ed5yf) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1.  @ttmallard that all depends on your opinion. As we already figured out your 10×1 desth rate is just made up. So if they out of everything. Russia should not have any problems taking all of ukraine. Or even bakhmut
    1
  2.  @ttmallard  ah so shooting missles at civilians is a war crime. Ok when will you be sad about the tenthousands of ukrainian civilians who died through russian shelling. Qhat excact incident are you talking about
    1
  3.  @ttmallard  Well nobody beliefed ukraine couldt stand even a mounth in feb. Ukraine is always in for suprises. Yes they can tske back crimea. Will they eventualy we dont know.
    1
  4.  @ttmallard  your Problem is that for some reason you fall for the russian state propaganda which is showing russia as unbeatable. It is not, not even close. Their last wars Show this
    1
  5.  @ttmallard  Well you have no evidence what so ever of UK influencing the peace talks kid. Why is it that everybody thinks that russia is unbeatable. They last allmost all wars in the last 100 years. Sign a treaty aha. Like the treaty ffom 1991 when russia granted security, independence and freedome to ukraine in exchange for nukes
    1
  6.  @ttmallard  you forget that the russians face the excact same problems. In fact worse, because aperently Winter clothing along with basic equipment is missing. They couldnt even hold cherson. Your demilitarasation only works for russia aperently.
    1
  7.  @ttmallard  nope they basicly didnt admit to anyithing. According to them they lost 14.000 men. Which is of course bs. Your 300 dead per day claim is already of outside observers. Basicly we dont know. We can only gues. Estimates range geom 100k to 150k. Your claim of 10 to 1 rate is clearly bullshit. Russians and ukrainians now have equal waponry. Ukrainians are evidently far higher in morale, and get huge survailence and equipment of the West.
    1
  8. Sure. Where is the source for that. And your number would mean that around 600 k ukrsinians are already dead.
    1
  9.  @hansharz9934  the special Operation is only a destraction aiming to confuse fools like you. It Sounds better that is all. Second the bombing of iraq actually Was highly effective. After one mounth iraq was taken. All in all the invasion caused less then 50 k casaulties. Mostly military. They expected to just take a weak ukraine and annex it. Now this sparing of civilians is a cheap joke.
    1
  10. Kherson wasnt empty. And they left behind huge bunch of material again. No they have just the dignity to fire randomly in cities and destroy important infrastrucuture to freeze the population. They know they cant win militarly, so they try to sparks riots and uprising by cripling the energy grid
    1
  11. No boy. Russians kill ukrsinians
    1
  12.  @uberbeeg  Also the russians need time to build up factories. please dont tell me you compare it to ww2, because that would be dumb AS. Tank plants, are highly specialised and complex factories, with specialy trained staff, rare machines and complex supply chain of parts. it will take years, especialy in a warzone.
    1
  13.  @uberbeeg  You are not aware of how economy works right? Rheinmetal is a german company, headquarter and Taxation in germany. That means all, delieveries, projects and factories abroad still fall under german armament export laws. I know this I am from germany and read about this struggle mounthly. every factory, RM builds, even in Europe, like the bomb factory in italy, still has to aproved by the german government. You can accept this fact or not, it doesnt change reality.
    1
  14. Rheinmetal is not Bypassing the government, every vehicle they produce there is still aprooved by the government. But dont coun to much into it. Till this plant will be operational, it will take years
    1
  15.  @catadoxas  i dont know what mic is supposed to be. But yeah fuck the USA and their wars. But what does that have to do with the demilitaradation of Nato
    1
  16. If they would have, the war ould already be over.
    1
  17.  @mirekslechta7161  what you basicly do. You pick some hosts and experts that fit your narative and claim them to be the only reliable source. Diapite objektive reality
    1
  18.  @mirekslechta7161  scott Ritter is a pro kremlin troll that also claims russia never wanted to take kyiw, and as you that they killed 14.000 civilians. Qhat is also not true. You beloved conel. Is often and asa csn tell only on fox news and info wars. To Media which are know for ther conservative propaganda. Especialy on Ticket carlson.
    1
  19.  @mirekslechta7161  would be interresting qhat kind of websites telling you that russian speaking was prohibited in ukraine. Propably a Telegramm channel. I tell you why this is bullshit. 1/4 of ukraine are russian speaking. Zelensky himself, a jew by the way is russian speaking and had to learn ukrainian. After election. Many Videos of russian speaking ukrainians in combat. In liberated villiges. Etc. There is no reason for ukraine to do that, and also it is not true. For given reasons. Bit fell free to cite a source. Give a link and i will tell you how it is bs
    1
  20.  @mirekslechta7161  you fell for russian propaganda in another way. Bowhere in ukraine was russian ever prohibited. Neither in public or in supermarkets
    1
  21.  @mirekslechta7161  ahm no. Many of the civilians and espaxialy the soildiers where ukrsinian speaking.
    1
  22.  @mirekslechta7161  by using the wrong number of hundred I conclude that you didnt read my comment in totall but more reliy on your playbook. So I will wait untill you read it in totall and then we talk
    1
  23. There is so much wrong with that. Ok. All in all 14.000 people died in donbass. 11.000 whete soildiers. Equal split on both sides. The other 3.000 where civilians, 1/3 on ukrainian side. And no not 100. 39 and you cant blame an entire country for the action of a mad mob in one city I know thst doesnt fit in your narative ha 😉
    1
  24. Well high tech wapons, Personal, reasearch and so on
    1
  25. No they have not. The reason for that, is that the military docrine is highly different, A Nato country would not waste such amounts of shells. They instead would target the airdefence and airforce, gain airsupieriority and then bomb the enemy ground forces.
    1
  26.  @Sveta7  Yeah I disagree with most media about this point. But additional some facts that you should take into the equation: Russias major missle waves vanished, They reactivate 60 year old t62 tanks, belarus transfered around a hundred t72 tanks to russia, a package of t90 m tanks meant for india was transfered to the military, Russia is asking, iran, belarus china and North korea for equipment and ammonition. the wagner group complained multiple times, about the lack of ammunition. This are all just facts. It doesnt mean russia will run out completly of certain things any time soon, but it shows the increasing demand of equipment from other nations. Why would they do that, if they are fully equipted? wouldnt it be in their favor to project streanght, like´´ we can do this on our own´´
    1
  27.  @Sveta7  no man just observable facts
    1
  28.  @Sveta7  No man. Many talked about logistical problems and byrocracy. Everyone that has a clue knows that russia would run out of shells. Well. What is the point of preserve those old missles. For what. They begin to degenerate year after year. everyone first shots older ammo before newer ones, because if the conflict ends, you can store the newer ones much easier. Also we see, the ukrainian energy grid is rebuild, mutiple strategic valuable targets in ukrane, Yet no missle waves are coming in anymore like they used to. Given that russia has a much smaller budget for its military and tried to keep up with the US, would impley that they have around the same missles stocks, plus one or two thousand. russia already used over 5000 missles in this war. one way or another they running low. maybe a few hundred left, they would like to preserve for a possible future conflict.
    1
  29. Nobody ever claimed they would run out if ammo. What is true thogh that their missle stockpiles are exhausted. Shot down missles show production rates of 2022. Meaning that they only can fire what they produce.
    1
  30. Wow 100 missles per day for six mounths. Interresting where you got that number from. That would be 100× 180= 18.000 missles. 2 million dollars per missle meaning 36.000.000.000 billion dollar. Production started 20 years ago. So you wann tell me that they spend almost 5 percent of budget per year for kalibr. Not very convincing. Also if they have such a huge number, why didnt they started the war with much more missles, why do they use missles produced in 22 if they have many older ones. Why strugle to buy iranian missles and drones
    1
  31. The reason why this was possible, is because wapons back thsn where realy simple and could easely mass produced. That is not possible today
    1
  32. That used to be the case in cold war. Not anymore today. Also US military relieys less on artillery like russia and more on airforce.
    1
  33. No they qould nwver do it because articöe 5
    1
  34. Fair enough, but what does a squad of infantry man do against 2 km range missle
    1
  35. They have expierenced tank Crews already. Tanks are easy to operste and usually it takes 3 mounths to teach a Crew, less if the Crew already has expierience
    1
  36. I heard about a dozen, from oryx
    1
  37.  @pro_wie8299   No. Iran is something else than irak.going to war With Iran would mean also declere war to dozens of militias in the middle east. A very competent anti Air System and navy. Not to mention Trouble With russia and possible China
    1
  38.  @pro_wie8299  there ist absolutly No doubt that Iran or a Allied force caused this Attack. But If they would openly Claim this Saudi arabia would have No Other Option than start a war.
    1
  39. Iran and Saudi-Arabia are deadly enemys
    1
  40. Well aperently they still have a substantial amount in storage
    1
  41. Well so where are those messing tanks
    1
  42. He pointed that out. Also this was only one example. He also didnt counted heavily rusted ones
    1
  43. Well iraq was one of the biggest military powers on earth
    1
  44. The military budget under biden is even higher than trumps. But the US army doesnt need thousands of tanks anymore.
    1
  45. Yeah at two storage bases. Which are counted here
    1
  46.  @definitelyfrank9341  the sheer fact that you dont know that Bramsche tanks arrived in late 2023 shows me that you didnt done your research at all.
    1
  47. Well it isnt. So far 6 confirmed losses of abrams tanks. 3 damaged. That is like ine per mounth. Russia sometimes looses this number a day. The easy answer is, drones and ATGMs. So far they recieved abrams without advanced Anti drone systems
    1
  48. We where only able to produce few anti particles
    1
  49. It is not secret it is known for 40 years now
    1
  50. Those are are not secret.
    1