Comments by "s H" (@sH-ed5yf) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1. and for the l ast 2.5 years he was absolutly accurate...
    4
  2. Well anti invasion should be commin sense. And no. He just counted the artillery
    4
  3. You didnt watched the video did you. He said it is unlikly for russia to run out. And stop falling for the russian puppet
    4
  4. Nope we didnt. We barly gave them 10% of guns. Also we rely not so much on artillery
    4
  5. Well the russians fail right now
    4
  6. 1 year and 4 mounths later. He was right.
    4
  7. Are you aware that israel has nukes.
    4
  8. The advantege is cost and range. Missles are very expansive and and srtillery has a maximum reach of 60 to 80 km. With bombers, as long as the airdefence is destroyed, they can attack large targets for comparable small costs
    4
  9. Well He knows something. Unlike you
    4
  10. Funny little troll. Oryx actually claims ukraine to lost about 60
    4
  11. 😂😂😂. Sure. Did RT told you that number in Person?
    4
  12. ​ @Alien_isolationist he counted those possible in buildings kid. Try again
    4
  13. Wow. Your friends need to take less drugs
    4
  14. ​ @fujifurov671 doesnt matter. Your number is counting on the myth russia had 12.000 tanks to begin with
    4
  15. Well kid. The mighty russian army has advanced like 60 sqkm in 4 mounths. Bad work for the second best army in the world
    4
  16. ​ @kevin5073 yet still. Pictures to count losses is as acurate as we can get.
    4
  17. ​ @archyology this jiggernaut was driven out of the north, cherson and kharkiv and is unable to make any substantial gaines. And now they even loosing ground. Pathetic
    4
  18.  @archyology  the original Design yes. But many of them where produced in the 90s and esrly 2000s. Also tanks dont do Well, if standing outside in siberia for decades
    4
  19. The russian economy has the severest worker shortage since 1995. They lack high tech components. And you can only produce so much tanks. Yes they can techniclyproduce forever. But the question is, is this enough to replace losses.
    4
  20.  @nothere4089  they in fact seem to ran out. They csn produce about 100 per mounth and shot down ones Show production dates in 2022 and 2023. Meaning their older storages are in fact run dry and they reliy on thst what they csn produce
    4
  21. Well everybody know the ukrainian numbers are to high. But evidence by picture is harder to lye by
    4
  22. Difference is. Ukraine didnt start the war. They only defend themself. Ukraine never claimed to be a world power. Russia did
    3
  23.  @MrPaxio  a couple of soildiers? You talk about half a million men and woman, also wounded. Those numbers need food, fuel and clothing. Ect.
    3
  24.  @MrPaxio  absulutly. Ukraine last year purchased wapons and ammonition worth around 3 billion euros. They of course get a lot donated but not everything.
    3
  25. Pay soildiers and buy wapons from all over the world
    3
  26. ​ @Ali-fx6jd little difference. Ukraine never claimed to be a World class military Power. Russia did. Selensky didnt start the war. Putin did.
    3
  27. Absolutly, russia and NK both announced it and even shells with korean paintings appear on social media
    3
  28. That is a stupid thought. Every System is checked on their effectiveness, if they fail nobody buys it
    3
  29. It is not a hypersonic missle. It is a balistic missle. Huge different
    3
  30. Not a single one. But there are about 20.000 International volunteers from ober 60 nations
    3
  31. Their not existing airforce is quiet effektive in the south right now
    3
  32. A fraction😅 dude The russian ground troops are about 400.000 strong only about half of them are fighting personal take the losses and wounded into the Equation and you already now that ukraine outnumber them 3 to 1 only their equipment is supirior but this is shrinking every day as well. We Well see
    3
  33. Easy. Cause they literly sended everything tonthe ukrainian battlefield
    3
  34.  @vasjaforutube1  the iraqy army existed very much. It was one of the lsrgest armys in thr world..
    3
  35. .Easy to explain. The vietnamese aurforce was almost non existant and barly few missions. The USAF flew daily missions and very aggressive. Usually they got shot down by AA missles, not other fighter planes. If you want a true comparisson of air to air war. Look at the itaq iran war. Western modern fighters obliterated tge iraqi airforce.
    3
  36.  @hollywood5274  nice one kid. Whi invaded crimea in 2014. Who send wapons and mercenaries into donbass. Who invaded in 2022. Sorry kid but nobody takes you serios if you claim such dumb stuff
    3
  37. because Iraq at that time was the 4th largedst military power of the world. Including a dense defense network. Afgahnistan was a difficult matter. In fact they were most the times defeated. But after 20 years of asymetrical war and ambushes, the willpower to stay. But through all that time, america had absolute air supieriority.
    3
  38. For one simple reason. The nuclear arsenal. Without any use of nuclear warheads russia could stand a mounth against nato
    3
  39. We wait for 9 mounths now
    3
  40. At this point it should be clear that russia doesnt give a heck about civilians
    3
  41. Achieving air superiority is the number one goal in every war. Russia didnt managed this in 2 years
    3
  42. Iraq had one of the tightest air defence network on earth in 1990. But theougj texhnical supremicy they overwhelmed it
    3
  43. Well they dont. Because we dont want ww3 over ukraine. And ukraine makes a quiet good job
    3
  44. Yeah against rebels with some rifles and inocent civilians in ther cley homes
    3
  45. But for some reason they cant shot down a drone on a trail of 600 km
    3
  46.  @DrLsuBoyMatt  nope. Just the result of letting military hardware rot outside in harsh russian climate for decades. Do you know how much damage an average car takes after a single Winter outside...
    3
  47. Nobody claimed that they would run out of tanks in 2022. And they did indeed run out of missles. Thats why they stoped large attacks in early 2023. But they produced new ones
    3
  48. Nope just a military enthusiast
    3
  49. Well now about 1.800 if the rough number of destroid tanks are correct
    3
  50. There is a new one
    3