Comments by "s H" (@sH-ed5yf) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

  1. Nope they wont. You cant recover a exploded or burned tank.
    3
  2. Nope He didnt say such thing. But nice try
    3
  3. Yes it is. Russia denies ukrainians right to exist and what is happening when occupiers are feel like it you saw in the thousands of Videos of looting and murdering of civilians
    2
  4. BullHit number from a bullshiting troll. Besides, russia used its airforce from day one.
    2
  5. Are you literly coping from telegram kid. Not even the north koreans clsim the possession of such a number of subs in Total. What is wrong with you
    2
  6.  @MrPaxio  kid this includes everything. Csre of refugees, rebuilding, buy New equipment and so on. Do you know how expansive war is
    2
  7.  @MrPaxio  read my comment if you didnt get the other stuff except feeding
    2
  8. Pure cringe here
    2
  9. Oh so the russians finaly took adjivka after loosing 300+ vehicles in two weeks
    2
  10. Russia could end all the sanctions by just leave ukraine alone
    2
  11. Sure kid. Its so nice to live under a cruel dictator
    2
  12. Russia and North korea both admit the shipping. And you have no evidence what so ever for this 5 million claim. So dont try
    2
  13. Well south korea is not broke, and the homless rate is about average to the western world
    2
  14. Kiew in three days
    2
  15. There is but not realy effective ines
    2
  16.  @gumelini1  the entire north of ukrsine and parts of Kyiw.
    2
  17. Yeah you know that they losing ground right now everywhere. And russia used to have double that landmass. What happened to that.
    2
  18.  @krislalone4160  If they talk about russia having more tanks at their desposal than in the beginning, they mean on the battlefield. And this while propably true, only means they pulled massive amounts of stuff out of storage. Bringen ist to the battlefield. But this numbers show that they run low on equipment in storage. Also meaning ukrainians are able to destroy massive amounts of vwhicles
    2
  19. 7 mounth old troll account. Given that none has reliable numbers, on actuall russian production makes your comment pointless. And it doesnt change anything about disapearence of russian equipment from stockpiles
    2
  20. What terror attacks?
    2
  21.  @captaindak5119  accourding to vatniks vul3dar is in danger for a year now. Even if it is. Russia payed a way to high price for it
    2
  22. Nope little troll. Ukraine did not say that....
    2
  23. Given that they dont have enough ammo anymore would make this nunsense
    2
  24.  @milosmitrovic3239  Ahm nope. But I also wasnt gaslight by russia into the Idea that ukraine is a nazi state. Show some dignity and actuall awarness for politics, and stop taking everything russia tells you as granted.
    2
  25. ​ @milosmitrovic3239 first of all. You seem to like the idea of russia stealing territory with violence. Second he doesnt talk about the Overall war. He tries to estimate remaining gear of russian storage. Thats it
    2
  26. The very fact that this war isnt over already and russia isbloaing huge amounts if personal and equipment
    2
  27. Ahm did I missed a hige success of the russians, or what is that supposed to mean
    2
  28. And still they didnt destroy a single himars
    2
  29.  @valefur72  to be fair. The kurds are Well trained in ambush and anti tank waponry. The russians are not
    2
  30. The Attack in the saudi oilfield proof you wrong
    2
  31.  @definitelyfrank9341  nope that is not established. You just believe it. But ok. 17. Meaning 2 a mounth. Compared to two or three russian tanks a day. Who is doing good and who is doing bad
    2
  32. And what are those
    2
  33. Yeah but soon the public Was aware of it
    2
  34. Ah is that. And what could that be. A wapon they never testet. A wapon they dont use for intimidation. In reality they mostly reasearch in hypersonic wapons and technical warfare. They dont need another doomsday wapon. They already have one. But the new battlefield is the internet now
    2
  35. Well typical russian tactic. Overwhelm the enemy with sheer numbers
    2
  36. The americans did barly commit any ground operations in golf war 1. Almost everything was done by the airforce
    2
  37. Well because it is nonsense. Everyone will know who usedit
    2
  38. We arent
    2
  39. Starting a costly war for no reasonable goal is not smart
    2
  40. Nope most their airdefence is the s300
    2
  41. That is only partially true. The 3500 km is the totall reach you can fly under optimal conditions. But in combat you need to fly to the target 1/3, come back 1/3 and spare fuel for possible AA attacks 1/3. In totall around 1100km combat radius. Also only in ideal conditions. Flying low on sealevel, meaning thicker atmosphere the range deacreses. Meaning the 600 km is very accurate.
    2
  42. ​ @sandeepkulkarni8163 russia used literly every wapon sthey have. All balistic and hypersonic missles, t14 tanks and even su57. All division are more or less present in ukraine. And its not enough
    2
  43. Stringer than ever before. They pulling out 70 year old equipment and ask north korea for help. Wow what a strong nation 😂
    2
  44. Look up the definition of War instead of swallow the russian propaganda. Still ukrain airspace is protected by a good anti air system. Why didnt the airforce helped during the last days, why so they have to fly low. Because they barly can fight in ukraine.
    2
  45. And sacraficing its ground troops in the process
    2
  46. Your entire existance is
    2
  47. Because their would want to use their airforce as bombers. Ukraine has a small one but still is flying.
    2
  48. They did. They basicly used everything they have except the su57.
    2
  49. Always funny how people claim the F35 to be obsolet, while russias S57 is worse in RCS
    2
  50. Good that you mention syria. Who bombed and completly destroyed over 10 cities in the north again, along with thousands of civilians. Yes russia
    2