Comments by "Bell UH1H Huey" (@belluh-1huey102) on "GDF" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16.  @maksimoltu8236  Planes and missiles are accurate, artillery isn't, not to mention Russia caused a lot of civilian casualties in Syria, not to mention Russia has never reached the counter insurgency phase. Also looking at battle damage in Ukraine, the bombs and shells are scattered over a large area, like you can see crater holes landing far off target. Most civilians in Iraq died during the occupational phase. You see, when in a insurgency, you cannot prep the battlefield, but in an invasion you can warn people to get out of the way. Wait, I am looking at the civ deaths for Operation Phantom Fury which is 800 according to the red cross and 1.3k civilian deaths in the Siege of Mariupol according to the UN, Russia says it's 3000. Both of which were major battles. There is something funny about the Iraq War, especially in the Battle of Baghdad 2003, no civilian casualties reported weirdly, not to mention during the battle the U.S. dropped leaflets to tell civlians to stay in their homes or evacuate. This is one of many cases where the U.S. warns civilians in Iraq. There is also another thing to factor, secterian violence in Iraq, Iraqis killed eachother frequently because of Shia Sunni relations which led to a civil war in Iraq during 2006-2008, which also matches up with the huge spike in civil casualties. Now let's factor the Syrian Civil War, according to the UN 306,887 died in the conflict from 2012-2022 , now in Iraq according to the Iraq Body Count Project 2003-2019, around 205,785 civilians died. Boy oh boy, Russian support led to more civilians dying in a decade than U.S. "unrestricted and un warned bombing" and a whole bunch of other stuff in 20 years.
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1