Comments by "Nobodyherepal" (@nobodyherepal3292) on "BFBS Forces News" channel.

  1. Ah Louisiana….my home state is an American green hell. Glad the brits think it is too..
    104
  2. And the Russians abandoned a place they called “Russia forever” without a fight 🤡 Still a defeat bud.
    17
  3. Eh, maybe not a completely bad idea.
    13
  4. Not a single NATO solider is even involved in this war
    9
  5. Well this “prop” just took out a helicopter base in one strike….
    9
  6.  @daveo8480  oh yes, because TASS and RT is sooo much better right?😂 Still waiting For the “Bio-labs” to be shown off bud🤡
    8
  7. In the skies?
    6
  8. Not without help. And they lost to them in WW1
    6
  9. Australia fought in WW1, (a very artillery heavy war) and was on the victorious side of that conflict. And artillery doesn’t win wars. It always comes down to the infantry and his rifle.
    6
  10.  @dalbhuie_youtubeaddedanumber oh man, one disgruntled sailor burns a ship, the whole navy must be “protesting” now right? 🤣
    5
  11. Says who?
    5
  12. Ya, like Russia losing this war
    5
  13. No more appeasement
    5
  14. You really haven’t read European or American history then, have you?…..
    5
  15.  @jfkj1695 yes, those are countries. Still doesn’t make Britain at war with anyone currently.
    4
  16.  @niblet112  no it’s definitely coping. Or do you just ignore Russias army slaves, because you don’t care about Siberians, Chechens, dagistanis, khazaks, and Uzbeks? Nevermind the Syrian, Nepalese, Indian, and Tagik migrants that have been forced into the Russian military service now.
    4
  17. Cope harder tankie
    4
  18.  @Jamie-qt5yo with what navy?
    4
  19.  @diegoflores9237  what consequences for Ukraine are there, other then a helping hand shooting down Russian munitions killing its people?
    4
  20.  @diegoflores9237  like what? What more “escalation” can Russia possible do at this point?
    4
  21.  @diegoflores9237  “it can up the intensity of attacks” lol, no it can’t. It barley manages a single missile barrage every other month against Ukraine these days, and it’s not like the dozens of other attacks it’s already launched have destroyed Ukraine as is. So what changes here bud?
    4
  22. No more appeasement
    4
  23. It can’t even defend itself against Ukraine, but it’s suddenly going to be able to fight 32 other nation?
    4
  24. He should be, because 0 NATO troops in Ukraine was apparently a massive threat to Russia it just “had” to invade it…
    4
  25.  @fordwrc2006  We have treaty obligations to defend Ukraine that were signed back in the 90s in exchange for it surrendering its nuclear weapons. Some day, it will be a member of NATO anyways, so why not help it out?
    4
  26.  @supershayloman961 so, what’s launching all the storm Shadows then Ivan?
    3
  27.  @Robert-xy4xi  I will. And I will be grateful we didn’t repeat the same mistakes of appeasement that our ancestors did!
    3
  28.  @purgenews599  ya, I’ll take out They/Them army over Russias Was/Were army of corpses any day pal 🤡👍
    3
  29. Lol, ok bud sure. Is that why 1/3 of the Black Sea fleet have been converted to submarines by now? 😂
    3
  30.  @fordwrc2006  Iol really trying to get that paycheck from your handler, eh comrade? 🤡
    3
  31. They don’t have air superiority, that’s why you only hear of a few dozen strikes on the immediate frontline every other day, at the cost of 4-6 Russian planes every couple of weeks to Ukrainian air defenses. If Russia had air superiority, they’re wouldn’t be a rail/road system, electrical grid, or communication system left to even allow the Ukrainians to have a frontline, let alone one literally 90 miles from the Russian border
    3
  32. Electric warfare, anti-satellite weapons, misinformation warfare, good old “Ghost army” tactics, ect.
    3
  33.  @fordwrc2006  you just keep repeating the same thing over and over again. Like good little bot you are 🤣
    3
  34.  @fordwrc2006  and under treaty, we are obligated to defend Ukraine from outside foreign aggression. Which is what where doing now. No more appeasement.
    3
  35.  @fordwrc2006  you are NOT. A real person.
    3
  36.  @gumelini1  and every time, they do. Russian artillery fire has not only seen a huge decrease on the front, but less cruise missiles and drones get thrown against Ukrainian cities as time goes on. Russia used to launch 100+ missiles every week or so at Ukrainian cities. Now it’s about 40 every couple of weeks. Pro-Russians love to comment about how the Ruskies can throw 90,000 rounds a week, while forgetting the Russians were firing off twice that in the same time frame, during the first 4 months of the war.
    3
  37. No there still running out of ammo. You don’t hardly see massive missile strikes anymore, and the last Russian offensive suffered from lack of artillery support to back it up.
    3
  38. What do we need it for? It was made to fight Russians anyway.
    3
  39. Not a single Abrams has even shown up the front yet, and Russians have lost tanks then all of NATO ever had combined already 😂🤣🤡
    3
  40.  @Andy-kd5or  you think the Brit’s should use tanks on unarmed civilians?
    3
  41.  @diegoflores9237  indeed. Russia CANT escalate any further, seeing how it’s lost half a million troops just trying to hold what’s its taken so far. And even then, it has far less then what it took originally back in 2022, and is now in the process of losing land in Kursk of all places. So, please, by all means, what further “escalation” can Russia possible do at this point that is hadn’t done already?
    3
  42. Not that you need it….
    3
  43. No, we’re still interested in Ukraine. Gaza is a tragedy, but the results of the Ukraine war have massive consequences.
    3
  44. And yet, Russia doesn’t even have all of donbass 2 years later, while losing most of their conquests up to this point in the process…
    3
  45. You said the same thing about the 16 HIMARS I bet, but look who has Kherson again….
    3
  46. Ruskies go home.
    3
  47. You mean the like the Russians rhe Ukrainians already turned into fertilizer?
    3
  48.  @purgenews599  so what is then bud? The Russians being too chickenshit to actually fight for the land they “annexed”? 🤡
    3
  49.  @niblet112  again, whos Coping? It’s not NATO, because for the first time in almost 20 years it just gained new members.
    3
  50. Who’s coping?
    3