Comments by "Nobodyherepal" (@nobodyherepal3292) on "BFBS Forces News" channel.

  1.  @niblet112  it’s not “pro-Ukrainian”, it’s just the facts of the state of the Russian military at this moment.
    2
  2.  @richardmarsden5610 NATO never had any to begin with.
    2
  3.  @niblet112  apparently it doesn’t have the later, because Belgorod just got invaded today, and the largest drone attack on Russia soil so far has hit 6 different oil refineries within 24 hours….
    2
  4. Why would Russia want Ukraine, when it’s already the largest country in the world?
    2
  5.  @Robert-xy4xi  appeasement has never worked. Sic sac Tyranis!
    2
  6.  @hussainfreeman4541  well see Ukrainians back in Melitipol in the coming months alright 👍
    2
  7.  @hussainfreeman4541  it’s not “15 tanks”, it’s close to 200 MBT’s with over 200+ Additional IFVs and AFVs coming along too. Oh, and even longer ranged HIMARS munitions coming not long after….
    2
  8. Meanwhile, said Leo’s and Bradley’s are moving last Robotyne and Verbove over the Surovikin line this week….
    2
  9. They said the same thing about HIMARS. Yet it’s Russia who didn’t stop running away for 6 months after it showed up…
    2
  10. Hmmmmm
    2
  11.  @IrfanKhan-uh9yt  1) no, Russia still doenst have air superiority over much of Ukraine. If it did, HIMARS wouldn’t be an issue. 2) all that supposed “Russian air superiority” didn’t stop Ukraines 2 massive counter attacks last year, not stop the Ukrainians from moving troops and supplies the far east of the country for over a year of fighting. I believe the Abrams will do just fine, especially if it’s backed up by the Humvee Avengers, Gepards, Shilkas, and MANPADS the Ukrainians have already.
    2
  12. Because demolishing Russias ability to make war in the future will free up defense funds for domestic projects in the long run. And hey, I love seeing ruskies stacked like card-wood with my tax money👍🇺🇸. I love being the Arsenal of Democracy again.
    2
  13. You can’t even enter Kyiv 3 years later, and now you think you’ll somehow get through Poland and Baltics too? 😂
    2
  14. after regaining 10,000+km of land, Kherson and destroying Russias winter offensive at Vuldamur?
    2
  15.  @ahmedalsharman  again, Russia. If NATO had “trained Ukraine for 8 years”, why did Ukraine not even have a fraction of the western hardware it has now back then, or not launched any offensives into Donbass in those 8 years? And in what universe does Ukraine, who has no nuclear weapons, threatens Russia, the worlds largest nuclear armed power, with invasion?
    2
  16.  @jtkrpm1  fat chance bud. We’ve got at least a dozen counties making ammunition, 2 of which are in the Pacific
    2
  17.  @jtkrpm1  we’re not firing WW2 era 105mm round now are we bud?🤡
    2
  18.  @jtkrpm1  lol, is that your counter point bud? 🤡
    2
  19.  @Prz25  if you could, you’d be in Kyiv by now. But your struggling to hold Kursk instead 🤣🤡
    2
  20.  @elliotyourarobot  defeating a long time rival and enemy of our country isn’t putting America first pal?
    2
  21.  @fordwrc2006  Russia is NOT a super power 🤣
    2
  22. Still Russia, because NATO isn’t planning on invading Russia anytime soon. Unlike Russia, who’s started the largest land war in Europe since WW2…..
    2
  23.  @antique-bs8bb  it ain’t sarcasm. It’s the truth.
    2
  24. Yes.
    2
  25.  @elliotyourarobot last I checked, tanks, howitzers, APCs and small arms are useless in a sea and air fight. We still have plenty of air and sea reserves to fight China in the pacific. Because a land war on the Chinese mainland is suicide.
    2
  26.  @elliotyourarobot  or you focus on sinking the Chinese fleet before it ever reaches Tiawan to begin with🤷‍♂️. Why fight to chinas advantage when we should fight to ours?
    2
  27.  @elliotyourarobot  so?
    2
  28.  @natnaelghirma2617  then trenches work pretty well, since no one is willing to use nukes.
    2
  29. What good are nuclear weapons against other nuclear weapons?
    2
  30.  @jimmyoconnell6167  ok, so you know that every NATO country has fought a war at least once in their history then. Unless your the Stolen Valor “vet” I think you are…
    2
  31.  @antique-bs8bb  they didn’t? There still reporting it right now?
    2
  32.  @chadimirputin2282  least there not T-62s and BTR-50s 🤡
    2
  33. The same dudes also took back Kherson, Kharkiv, Izyum, Kupyansk and Lymen too. I say the training did wonders👍
    2
  34.  @samoldfield5220 who coping? I’m not defending a nuclear armed superpowers inability to establish air supremacy over a country 1/10th its own size, 2 years later.
    2
  35. So what’s with Russian mail bloggers going ballistic over this strike?
    2
  36. Because it’s barley destroyed anything of value the west has provided, that’s why 😂
    2
  37.  @elliotyourarobot the hell are we going do with this military junk except let it sit around and collect dust and waste money in storage here bud?
    2
  38. Source: trust me bro
    2
  39.  @niblet112  so, why does the largest national in the world need more land?
    2
  40. Because an island nation doesn’t need a large land force, I’d the enemy can never land on it to begin with.
    1
  41. We don’t have a lot of these. They probably had to get pulled out of storage and put back into service first. Alternatively, 7 months ago, we didn’t think this war would have lasted 7 months more….
    1
  42. You mean the same Taliban that only came out to fight when American jets left?
    1
  43.  @ashfaquezskv4558  where?🤡
    1
  44.  @ashfaquezskv4558  at this moment, it appears starting to be fought in Russia, by other Russians 🤣
    1
  45.  @ashfaquezskv4558  where? 🤡
    1
  46.  @samoldfield5220  air superiority means being able to use your AirPower over any stretch of a enemy nation. Not just the immediate frontline. If the Russians actually had air superiority, the Ukrainians wouldn’t even have a frontline to begin with, because all the supple lines, command and control centers, and troop concentrations in the rear areas would have been bombed to hell, long before they even reached the front. But their not. Because Russia still can’t control the skies over 2 years later.
    1
  47. And they planned horribly
    1
  48. Got to love conservatives. There so pumped to fight, until they’re not 😂
    1
  49.  @antique-bs8bb  ya, it is, considering Ukraine didn’t have that capability until the last month.
    1
  50. So why are Russians make such a fuss about it?
    1