Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Starbucks Briefly Bans Employees from Wearing BLM Crap" video.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@johnadams2833 Democratic Party aren't Marxist, co- I mean..."DUDE". [You are delusional, though...want a safe space?] And you "people" [no I mean, really, people- not plain 'idiots', or nothing like that...save the fact that you seriously are] think, at this point, that literally everything is left of "conservatism" which you can't even comprehend in itself. Either that, or you aren't really "American" anymore, not in the ethos of the last hmmm century. All you care about is a: money, and b: the projection of the growing Megalomania of growing metropolises into small nationalisms [and I do mean "projection"], as the demos projects the bourgeoisie "nobility" of the nation-state thru the city-states growth], onto the surrounding rural areas, which those townsfolk will probably accept: then you want to "seed out" the left, which if any group did such a "weeding out" of elements, whether if the left [say, ANTIFA] did this to right-wingers, or if the right-wing [or the "right-wing" (capitalists)] did this to "the left", this would be fascism; cause America is left or at least it always was: and in today's parlance it's simply "moved from center left to the right", simply put...it's roots are in Classical Liberalism (that's a fact), and colonialism (liberal-democracy of the growing social contracts, the growing bourgeoisie class, burgeoning the projection of the demos or the "nation-state" onto the surrounding territories [similar to how irredentism works in regards to race and territory, or "blood and soil", cf. Germany, cf. Ukraine/Russia]). The roots as such lead to the irremediable historical fact that AMERICA IS LEFT...but we are using ambiguous terms...the real terms should be about whether America has the national-faith to retain it's national heritage as a "liberal" and "free" country...or its fascisization [even if it's linker-fachismus or in other words, a leftist-fascism to combat right-wing fascism]...or some other kind of small nationalism or autonomy [cf. the riots], and possibly civil war and separatism. People say "the government won't allow this", and that's true...but either...America's hopes and values are on the line, that is, as it once was....That's America's place in time...on the brink...maybe it always was, but I don't think so...something brought it to this point but it wasn't the left. The "left" as it were, when it comes to the "center" or "center left" or what you simply call [in your simplistic means] just "the leftists" [even though that indication might apply more to movements farther left than "liberals", but that doesn't matter to you, right? right.], they just helped burgeon your economy...it is burgeoning, and it usually always is, but for the slowing down of this eventual process of what is to inevitably slow-down [oops], but for the time being, it's modernising at such a fast pace people couldn't even keep up [postmodernity], and as it were, things struck a "balance" [war is more like it, but with the fall of reason there is a tendency to blend with the older initiations of our past time immemorial as humans], but now this war is "cultural", so you call everything "left".
1
-
@johnadams2833 It's plain as day, however, that that what which you call "left" is a conflation, just like how that which the likes of the farther left elements of the left [ANTIFA] conflate Trump supporters ad hoc for "fascists", thereby, by microfascistic tendency, proving themselves fascistic in-themselves, and hetero-fascistic, at that; as opposed to auto-fascistic, of what would amount to the "right-wing" / capitalist / even an-cap, possibly...but this tendency seen in ANTIFA is strictly "linker fachismus" or "leftist-fascism"...the EU supranational union might be an example of this, too, to retain capitalistic endeavor within the containment of a demos and thus, potential for the eugenic-progressive dimension to come into play: same within China, and Russia, which are developing along their own lines, the former refusing democratisation but developing an econo-imperial inquest for the resources of surrounding nations, by force, in Asian nations, and by "economic guise" in Africa: latter becoming a quasi-monarchy with Putin at the helm in their latest parliamentary government. It's all very Faustian. And so what's next, well, what happens is that the sociality at-bottom is the core of the ethnic structure, or "the koineme", which is split along a world axis [thanks Holy Roman Empire] into a constellation of koinemes, which have forms so many polyethnic in-groups [thru phratries and intermarriage] that the despotic rigor of old tribes are retained in the ethnos which is always pretty much the living dead in terms of their work schedule...if they aren't already in dire straits...and hence you have the appeal of communism in it's most crude form, by the by,...but that's not Marx, Marx is anti-crude communism, certainly, but you'd have to know that, like I know it, cause I've read it...moving on...so these groups..which they now are merely referred to as "groups" and there are more "new groups" more than ever...are in a rather polyvalent manner...to such a multiplicity of degree that it scatters, by some point in what we call "history" the narods appear thru various means [this is the traditional societies and states and civilisations], and with that, the narods [not the "Narodnicks" in Russian History, that's just a populist movement], they, in multiplay of civilisationary and stationary forces, thru militarisation and economisations, enact several aristocratic city-states and nation-states in succession soon amassing empire over the Holy Roman Empire but not until several steps took place, like the Hohenstaufen and the relinquishing of the divine right of kings, et al., feudal/medieval history transitions into "classical" history,...and "civil society", the origins of "liberalism". Enter stage player America. Scene. The narod doesn't exist in the New World but as a facsimile of themselves, as a split narod from the Conservative British Monarchy and ethnos in the long-term, as Anglo-Saxons...And a mix of French and Dutch arrivals as well, all of you slowly incorporate into a giant federal government of municipalities [corporations].
1
-
@johnadams2833 The economy is your driving force now, in America, and the old world. Enter stage Marx. Scene. Gentile contracts himself to do a deed. He flips Marx like he did Hegel dirty to his phenomenal dialectic, out of Kant's noumenal dialectic (the a priori synthesis), with the concrete dialectic (placing the 'I' of the self-hood not in the State or Spirit, or Race a la Hitler, but no, in the 'concrete realisation of resource management and production for the HEALTH and SENSE of the worker to be a man in the midst of labor, and to reap the exact reward of said labor by associated necessary labor time and it's value as per arranged proceeding and the endeavor of the realisation of itself'. Giovanni Gentile took it a step further and placed the dialectical process in the "I" itself, as "mind". The "pure act" succeeds the "reification" of necessity [resources], tripping the perfection of the survivability and affordability of Marxian thesis into a state-worship cult of mass proportions, now en-cell'd in every orifice of any Europeanised land: all as Europe follows an Americanising popularisation, just the same, there are leftists, actual lefts, not just "the left" (ie., liberals, anarchists, Marxists, democratic socialists, anyone who's read these articles into their worldview, even. Where, in reality, everyone has read Marx...everyone has to, back in the day, to even reply to it, which they did...but alas, the point is is that "the left" as you posit it, with all those ideologies, is simply not the conceptual structure of "the far-left", and far be it by me to be ill-concerned for people who simply "think different" ["the left"] than you [in your hard nationalistic myopia], and let them be mingled in and confused with the actual "far-left" which is really just the actual left, and whom don't abide by the values of liberalism, because liberalism is strictly an issue of privatisation, which whether it be by the bourgeoisie [neoliberals, and neoconservatives], by some "race guru" [Hitler], or by some "state-worship" and incorporation of massive dispositive force for state-regulation of the public-body [Fascism, in theory: that is, as opposed to it's praxis and the axiomitising of it's evinced fixations and exigencies to achieve the mission pertaining to those fixations, usually purely symbolic (which brings me to my main point, see below), which for the most part, in the literature, is espoused by liberals against fascist conception, see Benedetto Croce, for one prime example]...Now we have the concept coming out of the alt-right of "liberal fascism", and this is because, clearly, "fascism" is a particular sort of "third position", as it were, and to apply the terminology here would be exacerbating and convoluted, but nevertheless it happens...it turns out that with this "liberal fascism" we get a backlash again of the entirety of the bourgeoisie, in a totally American fashion, consistent with it's historical appearance (seeing as nothing appears as such in Europe: hence, why for the most part Western Europe socialises, in a western fashion, save England which entails it's own monarchical values, pertaining to one of the longest lasting empires of history...for Italy and it's surrounding neighbors, see "distributism" of Catholic origin...as like in China how Confucianism still persists in the ethnic and social mores and background of the culture and even the "upper classes", the aristocracy in those regions of Europe still attain to a high degree of power...you can see this oligarchic strain throughout Europe, Russia, and into Israel and the rest of the middle east, Bahrain, etc). This "liberal backlash" is in a tendency all it's own. It's pretty much most things the alt-right says it is. But that is not the "left". It is just an American tradition, if you can deign to call it "tradition" even in the soft denotation of a "law" or "custom". America is fighting itself in more ways than one. And so is the right-wing and "right-wing [capitalists] in Europe.
1
-
1
-
1