Comments by "CynicalBroadcast" (@CynicalBastard) on "Refuting Gab on Libertarianism" video.

  1. Society is socializing. Styx. Sorry, but...that is just the future knocking at the door. What people should be doing is concerning themselves with abjuring socialistic corporatism for something that is more of a patchwork system- the metropolis should be the city-state par excellence, and that's that- competition is going LOCAL. "Socialists" as you claim aren't hard working, well, that may be, I don't know, but either way, society is growing by those hard working people [hopefully, right?] and as it does it will become more "socialistic" in the atypical sense of the term, that is, it will become more "corporate" in it's handling of domestic/civic affairs including manufacturing and business- or at least people will continue to strive for that- hard working or not. Because it will be called for—or people will have to use "platforms" to engender themselves to alternative sources of income [like we see in alt. media]—the oversocialization will continue. The socium only becomes neutral when nationalities are oriented with their own mutual world-islands. Laissez-faire capitalism is the pièce de résistance, but alas, oversocialization almost prevents this- the blockchain shows promise, however. But technocapitalist-socialists [indeed] aim to stifle at every turn any mobility of "platforms" other than their own- and any outsider is merely absorbed, eventually....
    2
  2. And yet, as the state becomes more centralized and abusive, people clamor, even on the right, for greater centralization- even in their internal logic, by ends of the apparatus of a leftism in state politics [ideally speaking] there are forces which want to fascisize groups around them, entrenched enclaves will see a backlash entailed, and people will call for a "breakdown" of these "subversions" [already called for by some] in order to create a "better functioning [efficacy of] state apparatus", even for the sake of the great economy- even those who claim to be "spiritual" in the sense that they are "traditionalists" [ostensibly] will derive this self-seeking wont as a means to an end, just so to "have order", that is, the abstract of order.
    2
  3. Elements of "muh christianity" are aiming to disenfranchise people and spin nonsense about them being "leftist" who engender society with "filth", cause it's all christian all the time, in America, where people seemingly want to abandon that "revolutionary edge" for a fascistic one, and then some want to return to monarchy [well, not many but it's an extant "theory"!] -- Sad.
    1
  4. Please, someone send out leaflets or something to the dolts who proclaim "taxation is theft" as a utopian statement- it's really confusing large aggregates of morons.
    1
  5. Nice platitude. Could be true to an extent- but you can't infer anything from your statement that holds any water or that can be expanded on.
    1
  6. Democrats, left ... Socialists, left ... Meh. Social conservatives also seem "left", too, by the same merit. But not the same token, O course. It seems that people are just blurting out these words without understanding any significance [and any nuance] in their usage or meaning. These ideologies and ideograms are running rampant turning people's minds into spaghetti.
    1
  7. While it's entirely agreeable on all standpoints [NAP, culture...], there is even a purely economical reason for borders. Borders are the organ-body's [state's] "cellular lining" [that is to say, a "micro/macrophysical lining" in the metaphorical/proverbial sense], which in turn, keep the economy in one "bundle" of flows, which the more flows [of currencies, et al] in circulation, all the better for competition and the functioning of the economy [especially the manufacturing industry- which in turn needs new models, clearly- in some countries].
    1