Comments by "Peter Lund" (@peterfireflylund) on "Europe's Migration Debate Explained" video.

You need much more than “stricter emigration laws”. You need massive remigration, on the scale of a hundred thousand a year. You also need to put the people who forced the immigration upon you behind bars for treason.
34
@FilAnd01 it was far beyond naïveté. Of course they belong in jail. I fear you might belong there with them…
5
@Veritas-66 genetic studies say you are wrong. The language changed from Celtic to Germanic (several types) and later got a huge chunk of Romance added to it, but the DNA stated mostly the same. Of course there are traces of Saxon, Frisian, Danish, and Norwegian DNA, but most of it didn’t change.
5
@@Anothertakeonthis have you talked to a psychiatrist about your paranoia?
4
@NoctLightCloud it’s that or the end of Western Europe.
2
@Veritas-66 no, just sloppiness.
2
@RFXZ67966 most natives (especially the women) are also net losses. I don’t think the Poles are any worse than the native Brits.
1
@FilAnd01 you chose to be an idiot and talk about racism. I’m afraid you lost that one.
1
@jadenjerries2094 there is practically zero racism among the host populations in Europe. We do indeed have racists but they are almost all imported — our not so nice immigrants are often racist towards us and towards other immigrant groups. FilAnd01 is right on that one.
1
@FilAnd01 the early Iranians did integrate fairly well, sorta. The recent ones don’t. The early ones tended to be educated (sorta) and from the upper part of society, the recent ones don’t. The early Iranians also tended to be picky about jobs (lots of jobs were beneath them) and they tended to believe they were more intelligent and better educated than they really were (the average IQ in Iran is a lot lower than in Northern Europe). The younger ones had a lot more trouble at uni than they thought they would. So there are some caveats…
1
20? Try 40 or 60.
1
@Veritas-66 I just today watched half of a long video today by Survive the Jive from about a year ago. He talks about a recent genetic study which concludes that the Anglo-Saxon contribution is much larger. That is curious, because it contradicts earlier studies that I’ve read. I hope to get around to reading it carefully soon, maybe next week, because I’d like to know how the discrepancy can be reconciled. Maybe he is reading it wrong, maybe the paper’s conclusions aren’t supported by it’s data, maybe it’s data are rather more spotty than they seem — or maybe there’s something wrong with the earlier papers. My impression of Survive the Jive from earlier videos is that he is honest and hardworking but not terribly bright and definitely not good at math so I don’t trust him too much as a science journalist… but he is better than most official science journalists and he is at least not one of the dumb “pots not people” leftists.
1