Comments by "ZIPZ" (@zipz8423) on "Al Jazeera English" channel.

  1. Do not think I have ever seen a video which is so completely factually incorrect.
    84
  2. Good lets isolate Putin the Corrupt .
    7
  3. Yeah , and the Russians want to mess with the English, England will not back down, they are biting off more than they can chew.
    4
  4. The truth of science transcends partisan politics. The chemical precursors in isolation are only "half" of a binary chemical agent. The weapon is only a weapon and deadly when combined with its other components, not stored at the same site. In case they were, the energy and fire from 76 , 1,000 lb warheads would be sufficient to incinerate those chemicals , hence no "poisoned air".
    3
  5. The Chinese are like the Borg, stripping Africa of its resources and now South America , there's nothing honourable about this attempted Chinese power grab. The West must curtail China by banning China from western markets.
    3
  6. And HAMAS? I saw people celebrating terrorism in the streets of Gaza. They are both as bad as each other.
    3
  7. So what do you think the max 10 warheads in a D5 are then? popguns?
    3
  8. RT showed the same footage at the Russian airbase in Syria and they actually edited out the images of the cluster bombs at 0:19 in the above video.
    2
  9. The market jitters are not based on falling oil prices , its China`s economy and the US interest rate rise which is driving this in part.
    2
  10. The Russians edited out aircraft at Hmeimenn airbase loaded out with White Phosphorous bombs in a video, they were busted doing it.
    2
  11. +Alberto Humova Russia has ZERO control over what happened in an Egyptian air port.
    2
  12. Translates to "We are lying again".
    2
  13. F-16s with Slammers v SU-24s with no defensive armament is no contest.
    2
  14.  @shamspuri2493  Are you as vocal about Ukraine, far more people have died there, in fact more died in 2 months than in 70 years in Gaza and I mean civilians, with 750,000 children deported to Russia.
    2
  15. Of course they knew, a ballistic missiles trajectory is a simple calculation once you have baseline data early on, its a little more difficult with an IRBM because its initial trajectory is similar to an ICBMs. The main issue is the problem of missile break up, if that happens then you get debris showered onto your territory. Hence the public address systems were activated.
    2
  16. Wiki isnt worth the bandwidth it uses. official UK government stance after SDSR 10 was 8 missiles with 40 warheads on a patrol.Kieran Jones
    2
  17. They do not carry 16 missiles, they are only capable of carrying 16.
    2
  18. TruthSeeker Russia in no way has 12 Ballistic missile capable submarines, its more like 6 and they are never at sea together. The USA also has more deployed warheads than Russia so those numbers are incorrect too.
    2
  19. Hamza yasser RT edited it out and now they have re-edited it back in, the original video in its first edit is no longer available I am afraid.
    2
  20. He is trying to but keeps failing, thats because the Russian military is amateur.
    1
  21. Give it a rest.
    1
  22. Your logic is a failure because you did not consider that Russia is replacing troops and equipment.
    1
  23. It does not matter, Russia does not have many of them anyway.
    1
  24. Without nuclear warheads they are a waste.
    1
  25. It is a wasted missile, a conventional warhead will not be able to penetrate a deep bunker anyway so it is a political statement.
    1
  26. +Swaglord350 I t was ISIS full stop.
    1
  27. No rules in war you mean like the geneva convention?
    1
  28. "Disqualified without any proof"?? Jesus man, whatever drugs she has been using I want some lol Russia got BUSTED for cheating on a massive scale, those jerks should be banned from every sport on earth cheating wankers.
    1
  29. SO why hasnt everyone been banned, stop being butthurt.
    1
  30. It can also fail miserably.
    1
  31. Just make sure the vaccine bottles dont have any left over Novichok in them.
    1
  32.  @sws-vlogs  or Polonium.
    1
  33.  @temich1985  Come and make me dipshit.
    1
  34. Even the people of Moscow dont want the Sputnik vaccine.
    1
  35. That was a very late intercept on the inbounds trajectory, impressive demo of PAC-3.
    1
  36. Nope, the smoke you saw was from the outgoing Patriots launching.
    1
  37. Evan Bell Submarines do not air drop nuclear weapons.
    1
  38. Evan Bell The "40" number is the max capacity we "say" we carry on board a boat on patrol but that is smoke and mirrors.
    1
  39. Some may have the sub strategic hard target (silo) kill role and max range with one warhead  a decoy payload I would assume, we would still be part of what ever today`s equivalent of SACEUR is, ie , part of a US led attack plan, the French too. I wouldn't get to worked up about the details, obviously they got their numbers wrong but its no biggie.Evan Bell
    1
  40. "The UK doesn't deploy decoys." Who told you that? Evan Bell
    1
  41. Evan Bell I don`t think anybody will use this video as a reference for the capability of our deterrent. Interesting that you say the UK does not deploy Penaids, which would be a departure for us. I don`t know because I was never on Bombers but I know we had them on AT3.
    1
  42. You're thinking about BMD the wrong way. If I am a PAC-3 unit defending a high value target I know exactly where the threat axis is going to be and I also know the trajectory the threat will be flying. I place my defences accordingly, the EMAD is a MRBM not an IRBM, , its terminal velocity is well within the capabilities of PAC-3 to engage nor does the EMAD do any kind of terminal maneuvering.
    1
  43. The PAC-3 erector/ launcher, holds 16 rounds, you dont fire 1 interceptor at at inbound, you fire a salvo to assure destruction when defending a High value target. The Saudis can afford to salvo fire their Patriots. It worked. PAC-3 is like the CIWS of BMD, its there to take out leakers in multi layered system, THAAD is the next layer above PAC-3. Unless Iran develops maneuvering RV`s, their missiles have little chance of getting past THAAD and PAC-3.
    1
  44. Iranian missiles follow a predictable trajectory without maneuver, thus will be shot down the same way the Yemeni missiles were.
    1
  45. Unfortunately for you ours are real and work.
    1
  46. Not tactically smart, the closer you are the more risk you expose your SAM batteries to.
    1
  47. Just to let everyone know, Rob Bushman, is a fake profile and a Russian Troll, we have traced his real IP location and he is from St Petersberg in Russia where he works in a Burger bar part time and dropped out of University but dedicates his spare time to carry out anti American troll activities on Youtube encouraged by the Russian interior ministry, as part of his cover, he comments on unrelated videos to give his fake persona the illusion of "normality", stay away from this man he will try to gain personal information about you from your youtube account including hacking.
    1
  48. It’s not my fight and I resent people trying to make it my fight. I don’t wish to be embroiled in a decades old argument and feud because I can’t solve it.
    1
  49. Japan doesn't have THAAD. Why do you Russian bots always say they have?
    1
  50. I don’t care about the Palestinian Israeli conflict and I don’t wish to be pushed to get involved in a decades old squabble over territory and religion.
    1