Comments by "ZIPZ" (@zipz8423) on "CNN"
channel.
-
YAWN, here, for your information, the US had 150,000 service people in Iraq and the country is still a mess, and here you are several years later and you actually think Putin is going to solve the problems in the middle east using force, well he is going to have to occupy the place to do that and the Russian military and country dont have that capcity comrade not matter what your gurus on RT tell you.
It must suck to be you.
You are wroking on the pretext that Putin is in Syria to destroy ISIS, umm nope, he is there for a diffferent purpose, to prop up Assad and to guanrantee Russias military footprint in Syria, dont be a dork and think for yourself my simple Putin apologist.*****
1
-
1
-
*****
I agree in part, Russia has some fabulous technical achievments, so does the US, in terms of technical mastery and networked battlespace abilities Russia is still 30 years behind the US military, you may not believe that but it doesnt matter, its out there.
Nope, Russia is capable of the same subterfuge as any other country on earth, here is an example;
MORE than 90% of Russian airstrikes in Syria, surface to surface missile strikes and nava cruise missile stirkes have been against NON ISIS targets, so Russia being in Syria to tackle ISIS is a LIE, they are clearly propping up Assad, who is btw responsible for killing 100,000 of his own population, this is something Putin doesnt give a shit about, Putin just wants to secure a military foothold in a middle east where Russia has friends you can count on one hand.
Dont give me this shit about Putin being the horse mounted Knight of valour and freedom thats a crock and you know it.
I have some bad news, events tend to overtake a plan within the first 5 minutes, Putin I say to you, welcome to the hell which is meddling in the middle east, you cant fix anything with force of arms, he will end up bleeding the fragile Russian economy to death with his silly misadventures.
Russia cannot aford it.
1
-
Sorry mr commissar, that modernization will cost more money than Russia has to spend, take a look at your economy, its on the way down, Russias GDFP is ONE THIRD that of the US alone thats without NATO, you couldnt win a conventional war against NATO because you are outnumbered 5-1, in Naval asstes alone NATO can muster over 500 combat vessels, compared to what? Less than 50 operational combat hulls , maybe not even that because we can see most of Russias ancient fleet tied up in port run wuth skeleton crews on satellite imagery and they never leave port, keep dreaming the dram cowboy, next time come armed with some facts, man you are one weak assed son of a bitch.Дмитрий Cоколов
1
-
1
-
1
-
And you are naive enough to actually believe that?
Dear lord, the standard of education in your country must be really low.
The US tracked every one of those missiles from launch to the target area, they have the assets to do this, let me tell you a little fact, 24 years ago in desert storm, Iraq fired 88 Scud missiles, EVERY single Scud launch was detected by the US DSP satellite constellation and you think now, 24 years later that US ISR assets would be unable to track the bright UV and IR signatures of the boosters on those cruise missiles at launch?
Keep dreaming your dream pal.
Secondly, since thosed missiles are NOT stealhty, airborne radar would have NO trouble tracking them, it gets even worse for you, this Russian campaign is an intelligence goldmine for the US military, they will be sniffing every single electronic signal, comms signals elint and datalink signal Russia transmits to its forces, the US mill will know Russian operations doctrine better than you know it yourselves inn a matter of weeks, thanks for that.Дмитрий Cоколов
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1