Hearted Youtube comments on Professor Dave Explains (@ProfessorDaveExplains) channel.
-
623
-
612
-
609
-
598
-
597
-
583
-
I know a lot of youtube creationists who have been pushing the Tour series for the past few months. It must be very embarrassing to back someone and have them so thoroughly shown to be uninformed/dishonest? Dave, my favorite part was the "Deceptive Tactics of Id proponents", because you so succinctly summarized exactly what dealing with these people is like. These guy (Tour, Jeanson, Sanford, Carter, Tomkins) have the incredible ability to do decent science when it doesn't threaten their YEC, but revert to a highschool level understanding the moment evolution or abio enters the picture. It's a powerful cognitive dissonance OR a downright chilling deception. And when they do attempt to address the gaping holes of Creationism, it becomes appearent it isn't about answers, but the illusion of answers, if only to placate the flock into believing that "everything is under control, we will be vindicated in the end". Great work!
582
-
577
-
570
-
568
-
562
-
As someone who is deeply religious - I appreciate your call out in the beginning of the video that this is not a debate on whether or not a deity exists.
Something I feel too many religious persons do is try to justify the existence of God using empirical means, when thatās just not possible, and in my opinion, just not meant to be. Religion exists to answer fundamental questions of the soul - our purpose, our destiny, etc. Iāve always tried to keep religion out of the realm of science, as thatās not what itās there to explain. Conversely, the āevidenceā of God is intended to be personal and private - something that connects with the soul. I donāt believe we will ever look to the stars and see empirical evidence of a God, as itās meant to be a personal discovery.
As always, Dave, I appreciate your thoroughness and high quality content, even if we disagree on the existence of God.
550
-
540
-
536
-
536
-
I realized, when James was showing that spectra analysis and going "If you're a synthetic chemist, you'll laugh" that... dude's desperate to be respected, huh. He's pretending that his flock are all just like him, professional scientists who think the same way he does, instead of anti-science zealots who want to strip funding from schools and universities. It's why he gets so mad when people criticize him from the angle Dave's been, attacking his competence and ability to read papers, because it hits him right in the sorest spot he's got; the fact that he's thrown away all his credibility to give talks at megachurches.
Your followers aren't your people, James. They don't know what you're saying. They're not synthetic chemists, nor are they any type of professional scientist at all. They're looking for any reason to justify their distrust of education and their desire to use political power to influence the direction research takes. You're never going to gain credibility with them, man. Stop.
531
-
526
-
525
-
520
-
516
-
512
-
500
-
497
-
496
-
495
-
I used to be on the "Ur mean! be more diplomatic!" train, but by now I've watched a large number of intellectuals and kind people patiently sharing their knowledge and life experiences, representing a more rational and compassionate worldview for years. I've watched them waste years of their lives reaching across the table, gritting their teeth and surrendering to the tone policing while everything they are and stand for is under a deliberate, dishonest, cynical and often aggressive attack from people who only care to control their audiences for wealth, power and control. Being nice clearly hasn't worked, seeing the current state of affairs. So I'm all for exposing these people and showing no mercy, whether it's science denial, bigotry or both, as they tend to go hand in hand.
487
-
482
-
482
-
475
-
466
-
466
-
464
-
462
-
451
-
450
-
450
-
446
-
445
-
442
-
441
-
439
-
439
-
438
-
434
-
430
-
428
-
428
-
426
-
421
-
417