Hearted Youtube comments on Pete Judo (@PeteJudo1) channel.

  1. Kahneman's book taught me mainly about correct and incorrect ways to use and interpret data. In that sense I consider it to be one of the best books out there. Of course the examples about psychology should be taken with a grain of salt, but that's absolutely not his fault (in regards to this book), it's the fault of the field of psychology which is still in its infancy and riddled with flaws and errors. You should be blaming the experiments that he used as examples, those are not his experiments. But the ideas about statistics and perception that he teaches from those examples are pretty much spot on and they'll transform your scientific mind in very valuable ways.
    68
  2. If ill ever do my own death metal band, ill reserve "Grapes and Cadavers" as a name candidate.
    67
  3. So ironic that all of this dishonesty is around research on honesty. Do you think Dan Ariely and the other researchers in the first experiment will be investigated too? Also, as a side note, it says a lot about your character that you took the time to make sure Francesca Gino takes care of herself given thr circumstances. That’s an incredibly kind and empathetic thing to do.
    65
  4. This made me wanna watch a video on Joachim Boldt, the one with the most papers being taken down, at almost 200.
    64
  5. Part 4 just came out and is just as interesting. The more and more I read into this the more I am seeing that all of this ties back to the 2012 article, with Dan Ariely being the original fraudster. This clearly picked up steam (you can see from Ariely's major businesses related to this), and it seems that this was too much too resist for Gino, leading to her own life as a fraudster down the line. I am surprised Duke University just let Ariely keep his job when the original 2012 article was uncovered.
    59
  6. I am a physicist with a Ph.D. in materials... and I take my dedication as a reviewer very seriously, so I found several mistakes in a few articles; in one of them, I wrote, "How you are claiming this result, that is contrary of all the data that we publish in the last 30 years" ... He answers me with a paper of my director, paper that I study by years. I found that he didn't understand what my professor wrote. Also, I have a review paper. It was horrible work because of all the papers that I read; only 30% had data that I could use, and several of them, around 20%, had fake data.. How could they publish that work? In experimental physics... In materials like this case, it is normal to find fake data. The reviewers usually don't want to revise all the data and the equations... I had problems with lower claims and usually answered, "I include the raw data of those experiments that you could follow to reach that conclusion; if you find a mistake, we can study together... and if is necessary, I could provide you with the samples to measure by your self" the answer is always the same "I accept your claims." It is time-consuming, but I repeat several samples and measure again to find out if I made a mistake with the previous one.
    58
  7. You're an inspiration to me as a scientist! I've given up on my PhD in the field of experimental physics and I have truly felt the pressure to shape my data to the publication system. I have read papers that proposed bullshit arguments just for the sake of filling up the theoretical part of a paper, rather than let the data tell its incomplete and confusing story. The academic system has left me deeply disappointed and only wanting to talk more about the problems with science that need fixing, rather than the subject I was trying to advance.
    58
  8. I would recommend in the colloid vs crystalloid argument describing why people found it plausible for a colloid to be a better fluid: it has an oncotic pressure that you can't get from crystalloid. The molecules are too large to leave the capillaries, meaning they trap the water in with them and keep the blood volume expanded rather than leaking fluid as oedema. This effect is demonstrable in artificial semi-permeable membranes. What is lacking from this comprehension is the fact that colloids including HES do direct damage to the glycocalyx (the little-understood membrane lining capillaries) that made oncotic pressures irrelevant, as even the large HES molecules could then leak out of the vasculature into surrounding tissue.
    56
  9. 'My Lobotomy' by NPR sounds like a sick emo song
    56
  10. "I don't know anything about this." More of us should be willing to say that!
    54
  11. I've only been on it for 4 days and and I've already uninstalled it 2 times. Super addictive
    50
  12. I think the biggest problem with Behavioral economics is that it’s hard to create environment in which you can make experiments that will give new theories. I think Kahneman (and Thaler for example) have more life anecdotes which are interesting to read but can’t be the base for solid theories. But of course their work in this field is exceptional. Anyway I appreciate your criticism for this book, this could also help with reading the news - you read something and accept it as truth but don’t know the population or environment in which they conducted those facts.
    49
  13. My favourite thing about forest is that it has a feature that doesn't let me open other apps. So it pretty much (along with do not disturb) completely mitigates the problem of getting distracted by your phone. I use this with a chrome extension on my laptop that stops me from opening distracting websites, and I'm pretty much isolated with what I need to get done. It's kinda crazy how much entertainment can distract you nowadays..
    48
  14. Psych Hon student from Aus here. Cheers for doing what many of us don't have the stamina to do in swatting away the amount of marketing bs
    47
  15. As a germanspeakee i can say u pronounced Klinikum Ludwigshafen correctly
    46
  16. Thank you for speaking on this. P-hacking is part of what makes reading scientific studies so confusing for the layperson, and causes results to be so often misinterpreted by communicators.
    45
  17. My brain is conditioned to associate "New Video From Pete Judo" with large amounts of dopamine
    43
  18. Pete...I find your videos amazing! It is obvious that you put in a lot of effort choosing topics, developing narratives in a way that is easy for people to understand and make them all bite sized.....I have been watching your videos nearly everyday....find them very useful....
    42
  19. This is an awesome format! Definitely agree with the point about not mixing addition and habits now. The line is certainly blurry (as with most spectrum-based conditions that are made binary through diagnosis criteria), but I'd now be a lot more careful with any discussion around addiction. Perhaps this topic is due for a refresh on my channel. I'm curious about the term "crystalization" - is that something specific within psychology? Final point - is there research on the overjustification effect as applied to the avoidance of unwanted habits? I'm well aware of how monetary and other external rewards harm intrinsic motivation for positive habits (the carrot side), but less informed on any research that's been done on the "stick" side. In my personal experience, creating potential monetary and social consequences has been extremely effective for avoiding bad habits or sticking to good ones that I know (through repeated experience) I don't intrinsically stick to. And anyone who has ever been through boot camp can attest to the powers of an external commitment device. One thing I've always been wary about when it comes to overjustification research is the potential for the results to be applied to an overly wide range of situations. Anyway, thanks for making this video, and keep up the great work!
    41
  20. kurzgesagt is a team instead of one person, the person who writes this is a science communicator phillipp dettmer and the team talks to many different experts in the topics of the video and they take care to mention this after each episode
    39
  21. Awesome explanation really easy to understand . And about what do i think is :- according to me tiktok is so addictive is because before it just seemed like a pool of content but now you have specific creators coming in with different genres and importantly 'quality' content . Consuming random internet trends makes you feel guilty after a lot of time is spent on it while you continuously consume content you think is good and like you will just crave more and think it was time well worth for the fun not procrastinated. Thanks for reading
    39
  22. Spreading harmful advice about mental health in itself should be an automatic 0/10. Keep it up man, you're doing God's work with these vids 😂
    37
  23. About the 3D recording… what if Apple is planning on making future iPhones with the ability to record in 3D? That would solve all the awkwardness. You could record on your iPhone and the footage could be transferred to your headset. The iPhone could easily have two cameras at eye-length apart, and use a LiDAR sensor.
    36
  24. Your explanations are incredible, I am legally blind and I still can benefit off of your videos and do not feel like I am missing anything. also, if anyone has questions for me please do ask. I always like to use appropriate opportunities to talk to people about blindness and what it’s like being blind so do not hesitate to reach out if you can think of any inquiries.
    35
  25. Please! That one result fails to replicate does not mean that the effect "does not exist" or that "it is a lie". Reality is far more nuanced. What a replication failure tells you it's that you need to carefully examine accumulated evidence, as there is always uncertainty.
    34
  26. Another thing that confused me about "dopamine fasting" was that on one hand "you aren't allowed to do stuff that increases your dopamine" - yet at the same time you're allowed to exercise😂
    33
  27. Thank you for these reveals. The world of academia is difficult to keep a finger on. You're doing marvelous work.
    31
  28. Can I just say that this video is super high jargon and I LOVE IT. We need more videos that just speak of the industry the way it is
    30
  29. Currently doing my postgraduate in Economics. Last year I read Richard Thaler's "Misbehaving" and fell in love with Behavioral Economics. Loved that this video popped up on my feed!
    29
  30. That was a very good analysis. Please do more VR stuff as the space matures. Thanks.
    29
  31. After looking at the vision pro it seems more like Meta is holding VR back rather than advancing it.. quest is making vr look bad to a lot of people..
    29
  32. I've seen some people who used the Vision talking, nobody mentioned anything about flickering. They said the experience is exactly like the promotional videos.
    28
  33. Thank you for debunking this pseudoscientific trend. You can't "fast" from a naturally existing chemical in our brain.
    26
  34. As a quest pro user, I think Meta can improve a lot of features by software. I hope Meta put more effort for productivity with Pro.
    26
  35. That Academia is broken, I knew for years now. A friend of mine worked as an academic ghostwriter for about 15 years. He wrote everything from "homework" for students up to doctoral thesis in many fields, mostly humanities. But not only humanities, even law students, psychologists and some scientists asked for his services. He said about academia (about 5 years ago) That is an industry based on lies and fucking around. Manipulating data, writing a paper only based on the buzzwords that were en vogue and nothing more were the norm. If there is a political issue in the mix, it gets even worse. But The science is settled, yeah, yeah.
    25
  36. I do agree with what you are saying but I liked the reading of the book because you could see that it was the pioneering work of the field. Nothing is bound to stay absolute through time especially something that was created less than 50 years ago
    24
  37. I like the idea of explaining something at different levels! Even though it is the same underlying concept, there is an 'aha!' moment with each new level. Well done!
    24
  38. As a struggling psych undergrad looking to get into a masters program, it's reaffirming to hear stories that aren't just point A to point B. I hope your channel blows up soon. Thanks for sharing dude.
    24
  39. I will explain IKEA in one word... Meatballs.
    22
  40. How do your videos not get more views?!?!? They're so well produced and informative.
    22
  41. Your content is just great! Learned something new a few times even though I studied it. Good job!
    22
  42. Peer reviewed is further problematic because this third party system is tied to advancement. Some university tenure systems will not accept a publication in an open access journal as good enough for tenure and promotion considerations. Instead, they demand publication is a prestigious peer review journal. Some journals charge thousands to make the articles that they publish available as open access.
    19
  43. MORE WENDY WOOD PLEASE (Thanks for all the time, effort and hard work you put into making these videos)
    19
  44. There are apps on google play that allow you to block other apps for a set period of time. You can block social media apps for an hour or two before you sit down to study.
    19
  45. Excellent video. This is something that has bothered me for some time, the addictive nature of these apps. This is going to bring some harmful after effects in the future. Not just tik tok, it's all geared against the user, the interests of private companies are their own wealth and stealing as much if your time as they want.
    18
  46. This is awesome! There's really so little information out there about Masters programs in this field. Most of the masters programs have started in the past 5 years or so and so alumni are really only starting to be able to guide undergrads in what to expect. Great working leading the way on this topic Pete!  I also think it's worth understanding the differences between different programs. For instance it seems like the masters at Warwick is very much focused on the economics side of things and data analysis and such, whereas my MSc Behavior Change at UCL was focused on health behavior change and was very much more based on behavior change theory and qualitative research.  And there can even be great differences even at the same University. For instance I believe your guest Zoe is doing the Cognitive and Decision Sciences masters at UCL which has a different focus (more JDM courses and technical analysis) than my masters at UCL, while both may still be considered within the realm of Behavioral Science. I'm happy to see so many programs starting up and seeing the field continue to grow!
    18
  47. I wanna get off my phone but Petes BITS keeps posting these banger videos 😍
    18
  48. So much gratitude to you for covering this case in such details! 🙏
    18
  49. This channel is like a hidden crypto gem, fundamentals be right as hell and it is gonna explode. Congrats on this channel mate, it is great not only in the most basics of info videos, which is, quality info, but also in entertainment and edition.
    18
  50. Thanks for introducing dual process theory, and awesome content as usual, here are my timestamps: 0:00 - Stroop test 1:41 - Daniel Kahneman's system 1 (fast) and system 2 (slow) 3:48 - Kahneman's theory is a type of Dual Process theory of the brain, there are two more: 4:57 - peripheral root vs central root (Dual Elaboration theory) 8:30 - habitual vs goal-directed behavior, which are 10:48 - two ends of the same spectrum
    18