Hearted Youtube comments on Empire-Builders (@Empire-Builders) channel.
-
2100
-
951
-
757
-
474
-
351
-
344
-
325
-
291
-
269
-
248
-
231
-
228
-
227
-
225
-
216
-
186
-
181
-
159
-
157
-
154
-
152
-
145
-
142
-
133
-
126
-
122
-
109
-
108
-
The idea that the Saxon Wars were "The" cause for the viking age is nowadays considered to be a bit outdated. Franco-Danish hostilities existed before Verden (just as Scandinavian traders existed after it), the first areas to be targeted were in the British isles, and there are quite a few problems with attributing a premodern pan-German national identity as a motivating factor. Keep in mind, the first version of the Dannevirke was built to keep out the Saxons, and the Danes attacked across it when the Saxons were weakened by the Saxon Wars. Meanwhile Verden itself was enabled by "The Saxons" themselves, with some Saxons turning in the rebels. I use quotation marks because there were many Saxon tribes, and your loyalty was to your tribe and not to a nationalistic idea of the Saxon People writ large. Never mind the Swedish and Norwegian vikings, who were less connected to the Saxon Wars.
Now, the Saxon Wars could have been a contributing factor in the start of the Viking Age, with displaced warriors and chieftains now needing a new career path with some of them having political connections in Denmark, for example, but similar displacements were happening elsewhere in Scandinavia at the same time, so it wouldn't be quite right to present it as "The" cause.
Of course, whatever it was the started the Viking Age, what kept it going was that they found out it was profitable, they liked it, they were good at it, and they were alive.
106
-
102
-
100
-
97
-
93
-
90
-
88
-
88
-
85
-
84
-
81
-
80
-
77
-
76
-
75
-
74
-
74
-
71
-
71
-
70
-
70
-
69