Hearted Youtube comments on Anders Puck Nielsen (@anderspuck) channel.

  1. Thank you for the warning Anders. For those who wish to put extra effort into fighting these scams: 1) Open the fake channel. Find the "report" option. Report them for "impersonating others". The process will ask about the original channel being impersonated. It's the channels address line that is to be used. See 2) 2) Open Anders' (or whoever is being impersonated) channel. Copy the adress line at the top. Note: It has to be the front channel page, only that will work, not any sub-page ending with "../videos" or such. 3) Back in the reporting process, at the end you can add extra info like that "the real channel itself warns about these scams" or such, if you wish. After reporting the fake channel I go back to my notification and any nearby fake posts from the scammer and report them as "unwanted commercial/ spam" since the posts are "copy-paste" spammed everywhere. If you have the time you can go through the comment section and report all those you find. To do this first "sort by newest" to find them bunched together. There's a chance it helps but we can't know, and it does take time. Please do be careful only to report the fake posts and not accidentally report some real comment, it can be a difficult task to reverse a report. Good hunting.
    25
  2. Thank you for your insightful videos, sounds spot on!
    23
  3. Living not far from one of the landing site of US troops during the invasion of Panama, we are getting connected in a very unexpected way...
    23
  4. Tack!
    22
  5. Outstanding analysis, thank you so much Anders!
    22
  6. On reflection I agree with your assessment not Michael’s
    20
  7. Excellent as always, thanks Anders.
    20
  8. Tillykke med bogen😊 den skal læses
    16
  9. Thanks for sharing your expertise and analysis with everyone!
    14
  10. Thanks!
    13
  11. Thanks!
    13
  12. Thanks!
    13
  13. Obrigado!
    13
  14. Hi Anders, Thanks very much for your discussion concerning Twitter & social media platforms. I found it fascinating and in depth, but presented in a way that a non-expert could fully understand and appreciate. I learned a lot from your short video and encourage you to make other videos not focused solely on the Ukraine war. I eagerly await and seek your videos because of your thorough and in depth knowledge of the subject matter. You are doing an excellent job and I want to encourage to keep up the great work. Congratulations! John Murphy
    13
  15. Thanks!
    13
  16. Thank you.
    12
  17. Thanks!
    12
  18. I would've been very surprised to hear something else from you. Great to see myself on your side once more.
    12
  19. Thanks a lot for your work, Anders! Much appreciated.
    11
  20.  @anderspuck  Good on you for staying in your own lane and not BSing everyone.
    11
  21. Great video. And apparently you speak Russian, too. You keep impressing me. :)
    11
  22. Thanks! I was expecting you to also talk about the possibility of using a deterrence strategy against sabotage.
    11
  23. Bedankt
    11
  24. Great video.
    11
  25. Thanks for sticking with it despite YouTube siding with the trolls. You add clarity, and that's what keeps your real audience coming back
    10
  26. Tak!
    10
  27. Thank you for the great analytical work!
    10
  28. Just finished your book. Thanks for a easy updated read about modern war.
    10
  29. Thanks
    9
  30. It is the main thing I don't understand with the Kharkiv and talk of maybe another Sumy attack, Ukraine have large forces tied up on borders where they were not able to be used efficiently. I keep hearing that Russia has a manpower advantage along the active frontline because it has 4-500k against Ukraine's 3-400k, but that Russia has just around 500k+ in total for the war and Ukraine has 900k active soldiers. Why allow Ukraine to use its larger force and on defensive actions as well. I could maybe see an argument for Russia thinking it has a large enough material advantage to believe spreading out would force Ukraine to prioritise supplying some fronts over others, but even if that ended up working the result of that would be a siege of large cities that Russia just does not have the manpower to encircle or fight trough. Extension of the frontline just isn't something Russia can get a long term advantage off, it allows Ukraine to utilize more men that were tied up and ineffective for the war effort. Personally I don't see Russia as having a chance to win the war as I hold the 2 key beliefs that Ukraine will never give up and the West will never stop supplying Ukraine, the west will in my opinion just keep increasing capacity and eventually go far beyond what Russia has the capacity for. But with that note out of the way, if I were Russia and I absolutely wanted to keep going and trying for victory this Kharkiv attack just does not make any sense with the resources dedicated for it. It has to be just a propaganda move, throwing away resources and putting Russia in an even worse position just to show that it is still capable of taking territory. Whether to show Ukraine/The West, internal population or both how Russia is still "winning", some commander wanted to show off how good he was or to show that it is taking the incursions into Belgorod seriously idk, but it definitely is not because it is a viable offensive.
    9
  31. For a military nerd you did well explaining macroeconomics
    9
  32. Tak!
    9
  33. Thanks, really appreciate your analysis of all this
    9
  34. Thanks! Appreciate your perspective.
    9
  35. Thanks!
    8
  36. Alas, I cannot read Danish. However, I will lobby some of our publishers, the book sounds interesting.
    8
  37. ¡Gracias!
    8
  38.  @anderspuck  Perun is awesome, can't wait to see the conversation
    8
  39. Interesting analysis, i agree, but i think the situation was not much different in WW2. The main axis members were there for convenience reasons and not really helping each other too much. If your ideology is that tour nation is the best, that it’s special, that kinda hinders any real alliance, intended as sincere collaboration to find win-win and help each other.
    8
  40. Very informative, thank you so much! I just subscribed to your newsletter to support your work
    8
  41. Thanks! You are doing an amazing job informing and explaining!😊
    7
  42. Tak!
    7
  43. Thanks for talking about this
    7
  44. Analysis of such quality and critical insight is what i would love to see established as standard for public broadcast journalism. You're doing a great job, thank you.
    7
  45. Thanks! Jeg takker også Anders. og håber at flere vil sende private donationer mod Ukraine. Jeg syntes det ser lidt sort ud lige nu, men det er jo altid mørkest lige før solopgang.
    7
  46. Thanks!
    7
  47. As always, thank you for the consistent, up-to-date, logical analysis.
    7
  48. This is a great video. At first, I didn't really care about the Russian state's view of the ICC and wasn't planning on viewing the video. However, it's a very pertinent and interesting analysis and I'm very happy to have seen it. Great job!! 👍👍
    7
  49. Tak!
    6
  50. Thanks! Knowledge is power. Thanks for helping me understand Russia in a way that no other source does.
    6