Hearted Youtube comments on The Armchair Historian (@TheArmchairHistorian) channel.
-
1300
-
1300
-
1200
-
1200
-
1100
-
1100
-
1100
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
1000
-
950
-
941
-
931
-
922
-
922
-
896
-
879
-
867
-
866
-
866
-
866
-
863
-
856
-
853
-
839
-
835
-
834
-
824
-
810
-
782
-
781
-
763
-
754
-
711
-
710
-
707
-
707
-
Why you didn't mention the other two reasons that forced the French to quit their campaign? The intervention turned out to be too expensive overrall and produced little profit to the french government, AND the franco-prussian relations were getting dangerously hot, so the troops in Mexico would be needed against Prussia in a possible war, which happened (the Franco-Prussian war). The northern neighbours were not entirely responsible for the french withdrawal. Besides, a strong french foothold in America would compromise US influence over the entire continent, so their almost-intervention in Mexico (they were ready to set foot in the battle of Bagdad, Tamaulipas) wasn't because of benevolence. A legend says that Juarez got their help from the Americans because of the masonry-motivated friendship between Juarez and the American elites of the time (the York rite).
On a sidenote, one of the most successful mexican generals of this war was the future president Porfirio Díaz, chiefly responsible for the pacification, industrialization and modernization of Mexico, a country that up until him only had known war and civil unrest since the independence in 1821. His efforts to rise from the ashes of a war-torn Mexico to a western-European style Mexico were greatly admired in Europe.
706
-
703
-
702
-
687
-
686
-
677
-
662
-
636
-
630
-
604
-
570
-
546