Hearted Youtube comments on Ed Nash's Military Matters (@EdNashsMilitaryMatters) channel.
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
Ed, as air crew on the TBM-3E Avenger "Doris Mae" CAF Capital Wing, thanks so much for researching this. What if the Avenger was not the backbone of the Marine/Navy Torpedo/bomber fleet? Who knows? As our Maintenance Officer says, "She's fat and slow, but we love her so."
The TBM's line's are not beautiful, unless you love her, but she: delivered iron on target, handles like a dream, hauled the mail, flew eight hour missions, and oh yeh could land on Jeep carriers. Impressive piece of metal that she is.
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
Thank you, Ed, for covering our war. Your analysis is spot on. You are absolutely correct that Kherson offensive was needed to draw in russian reserves.
I was considering it even before the southern offensive begun. You see, the successful attack requires superior numbers,firepower and an element of surprise. Ukraine was announcing the southern offensive for months, even president was talking about it and he never talked about any military orders before. I mean when he said something along the lines of: "The military was ordered to liberate the South", I raised an eyebrow. To me that was suspicious and I thought it was either gross incompetence or part of some sort of plan to bamboozle russians in order to attack somewhere else. Turns out it was the latter.
Russians were preparing, and expecting the attack in the South. Once counteroffensive there begun, they threw their reserves in. But when it comes to North, nobody was even considering the possibility of attack there, much less announcing anything. There was literally no info about it prior to first liberated towns. Which is the correct way to do an offence.
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
Thank you Ed for this interesting update.
And though I agree that the Indonesian Navy needs upgrading.
I think this deal is bad for them.
1) I do not see the big advance in capabilities between the FREMM ships and the Sigma-based, Martadinata-class. The only one I can see is the 15-30 VLS with Aster AA missiles (which both the Italian and French versions have - so I assume the Indonesian version will also).
Other then the VLS tubes and maybe sensors - I see no other, major advantage. In anti-submarine, anti-ship, aircraft deployed (assuming they go with a one hangar version), main and secondary guns, speed and range (more or less)...the two ships are broadly similar. And with the modular nature of the Sigma-ships? I doubt that the Aster VLS tubes could not have been integrated into new Martadinata's. The Brits bought them for their Type 45's. So obviously Eurosam (the French/Italian manufacturer of the Aster) will install the weapons in ships the French/Italians did not build.
2) It is almost certain that all six ships (and the refurbishing of the two old ones) will be built entirely in Italy. Whereas the Martadinata's were going to largely be built in Indonesia. Thus, many Indonesian jobs will be lost.
3) these FREMM frigates appear to cost at least twice as much as the Martadinata's. And I do not see a military superiority to justify the massive increase in cost.
4) and finally, what the bloody heck are they doing buying two, OLD, Maestrale-class frigates? As you probably know better than I - refurbishing military equipment invariably ends up costing HUGE amounts of money. And these things ware already 40 years old. How could two, brand new Martadinata's - build largely in Indonesia? Possibly be worse than 2, refurbished 40+ year old frigates - with all the work to be done in Italy?
I smell corruption here...i.e. 'kickbacks'.
Because this deal - unless I am missing something (and I very well could be) - seems like a bad one for Indonesia over the previous deal they had for 4 more Sigma-based, Martadinata's.
42
-
41
-
41
-
41