Comments by "" (@timogul) on "Fox News" channel.

  1.  @KurtElliott  It was entirely legal for Pelosi to pick her committee from both sides. The Speaker picks the committees, anything else is a courtesy. She offered to allow Republicans to pick half, but they only nominated clowns.
    8
  2. Americans.
    7
  3. I think Republicans should elect people who can read themselves, so they don't need things read to them.
    7
  4. "I'm with stupid."
    7
  5. Why do you believe people would be more likely to vote for someone who was found liable of sexual assault?
    7
  6.  @coreyb9240  Because the American people are NOT "just getting one check." That is only one part of the bill. American people are also getting things like improved unemployment payouts, food aid benefits to families, funding to keep schools and transit open, a significant child tax credit, vaccine distribution, health insurance subsidies, etc. Basically, the $1400 is the floor of what people get, but the more in need people are, the more additional functions the bill provides for them. Just handing people cash is not always the best solution to a problem, but it can be a part of a solution. But yes, conservatives pushed the Democrats to lower the top-end of the eligibility requirements so that some people will be getting less. We need bigger Democratic majorities in the Senate so we can avoid that sort of thing in future.
    7
  7. If he wants to fight the subpoena, he can drag it out for months. If they want to talk to him on schedule, why not do it in public? Or are they worried that they won't be able to lie to the American people about what he said afterward?
    7
  8.  @Bluesit32  The followers choose their leaders though, so they are as much to blame. Nobody on Earth has a mandate from Heaven, every leader, religious or secular, is a choice.
    7
  9.  @keenumman1  Nobody is talking about tolerating any degeneracy. This is about LGBT people, not about MAGA.
    7
  10.  @425HP  If you believe that, then you have been successfully hoodwinked. Congratulations.
    7
  11.  @saularce7957  No, it's the guns. Other countries have just as many people who want to do crimes, but since they have fewer guns, those crimes are not as harmful.
    7
  12.  @frankgrabasse4642 Yeah, basically, the better the US is doing relative to the rest of the world, the more immigrants come here. So. . . it looks like America's getting better and better under Biden, right?
    7
  13. Yes, but Moscow Mitch was too busy confirming conservative judges to bother.
    7
  14. No, it's not about "the political establishment being able to dictate who is and isn't allowed to be president of their "democracy"" It's about upholding the Constitution.
    6
  15. It's very Trump.
    6
  16. People who want responsible government.
    6
  17. Because Trump fans are lunatics and want to overthrow the lawfully elected President. They do not care about the law if it hurts their feelings.
    6
  18. Yeah, his supporters are like children, they'll clap and cheer at any insane thin they hear.
    6
  19. And any illegaly entry is detained and processed according to US law, and then deported if not granted residence.
    6
  20. Well, the difference is that there's no reason not to be tolerant of them, and there's nothing wrong with them doing something like this, so. . . What's the issue, exactly?
    6
  21. You misspelled Donald Trump.
    6
  22. Pam: "They're both the same picture."
    6
  23.  @AndrewTSq  Yeah, the human mind easily falls for scams like that. It's easier to convince someone of a lie than it is to convince them of the truth, you just need to tell them that "that other guy doesn't want you to know this truth I'm telling you," and their mind is yours to own.
    6
  24. He does appreciate a good liar.
    6
  25. Doooo ittttt!! Can we get more idiots to resign for nothing?
    6
  26. @seraeggobutterworth5247 Nowhere in the 14th amendment does it say or imply that someone needs to be charged, tried, OR convicted of any crime to fall under the 14th's provisions. In fact, most of those who were disqualified from a ballot under the 14th were never charged, tried, or convicted of anything. The 14th does not say "if they have been convicted of insurrection," or anything of the sort, it only says "if they violate their oaths of office, which Trump did. A judge or other duly appointed election official is constitutionally justified in making such a determination, but of course higher authorities could overrule their determination. But again, legal convictions are 100% irrelevant to the process, I have no idea why so many on the right seem convinced that this is a winning argument for them.
    5
  27.  @MrOldclunker  Discussions about Jan 6th would not be privileged, as it was conduct in violation of their duties as legislators. They only have protections when they are operating LEGALLY.
    5
  28. That probably would be Trump's best defense, but it still wouldn't protect him.
    5
  29. Meanwhile, back in reality. . .
    5
  30. That would be illegal, as he's violated no oaths. I think you may have a problem understanding what "constitutional republic" means.
    5
  31. Well, part of the issue is that the portions of congress that are demanding attention on this topic are the ones intended to "Weaponize government," so it would not be in the people's best interest to humor them. I'm sure that if legitimate requests for information were made by legitimate inquiries, the DoJ and FBI would cooperate.
    5
  32. His first name is "Donald," not "Brandon" Trump.
    5
  33. It certainly wouldn't help Trump's electoral chances, which is ALL he's ever cared about.
    5
  34. "Is he legitimately insane, or just evil?" basically.
    5
  35. There was no indictment at all. If there had been, THAT would be news. But all Durham had to say was "I could not find the sort of wrongdoing that Trump hired me to find, I suppose because it never existed in the first place, but boy am I disappointed."
    5
  36.  @johnchristman750  Nowhere does it state that congress should make that decision, and in most cases in which it was applied, it was not congress applying it. The Constitution gives states the authority to coordinate their own elections.
    5
  37. No, there's no problem, because the person being inaugurated is the lawfully elected president. It's only a problem in those other countries when the leaders being put in power were not lawfully elected. It is sad that defenses like this are necessary, but we didn't have them last Wednesday and you saw what happened. Trump fans are lunatics.
    5
  38. It happens in all parts of this country,. because we lack proper gun control.
    5
  39. Better than a ":border field trip," right? At least a climate field trip has lovely nature to look at. I don't know why so many politicians feel the need to wander over to the border and go "yup, it's a border all right."
    5
  40.  @lisal9829  Thanks. Seriously, these people and their weird excuses for bigotry. . .
    5
  41. Yes, vote blue, no matter who. Jesus would.
    5
  42. The thing you guys commenting need to understand is that when MAGA conservatives talk about "justice," they don't mean the same thing that other people do, where it is a consequence of that person committing a crime. They just mean "we do not LIKE that person, and want the government to HURT them for us." This is basically fascism in a nutshell. The concept of "justice" to them is more just what most people would call "hate."
    5
  43. The Declaration of Independence is not legally binding US law.
    5
  44. He hasn't done any treason though. You're thinking of the other guy.
    5
  45. Guys, they do press briefings EVERY day. He's not Twittering while taking a dump like the last guy, and that's a good thing.
    5
  46. Someone really needs to explain to Manchin that it is fiscally responsible to run up deficits during a crisis to stabilize the economy, and then to work it down during times of prosperity so that things will be stable again by the next crisis. The problems with the deficit is not in wanting to spend money right now, it's that over the last four years they lowered taxes on the rich, blowing up the deficit, rather than drawing down the deficit during a time of relative stability.
    5
  47. It's because the riots during the summer were not an insurrection against the duly elected government, attempting to install Trump as a dictator. It was a very different situation, so there was a very different response.
    5
  48. The 14th amendment to the US Constitution.
    5
  49. @seraeggobutterworth5247 Due process was done in this case, according to the law. Nowhere in the 14th does it say or imply that a criminal conviction would be required to apply the terms of the amendment, and in point of fact most of the people it was applied to were never convicted of any crime. The "due" process" in this case is for a judge or other official duly appointed to administer ballot approval to make the determination that oaths had been violated. If a higher authority over-rules their determination, then so be it, but that is all it takes to get the ball rolling.
    4
  50.  @zs9458  Because their countries are currently too dangerous for them to stay, which is why they leave for America. Again, it's your choice as to whether you want them here, or living safely in their own countries.
    4