Comments by "Z P" (@zachman5150) on "Leeja Miller"
channel.
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@TransHippie You spelled credible wrong. Replacing objective definitions which are based in physical reality, with entirely subjective metaphysical claims, is not logical in any way, is not morally superior, and is demonstrably harmful, not least to female rights and protections, but also to practically anyone that buys into it as it warps people's perception of the underlying issues.
It hinders people in their quest for individuation, creating this false narrative of them becoming more "authentic" when the total opposite is true, they believe they need validation from others in order to be happy etc. instead of being encouraged to find more inner strength and resilience with less reliance on how people see them. Demanding to be legally recognized as the opposite sex of what one is, is in no way shape or form more authentic than accepting the physical reality one is born into.
To believe we as individuals can have 100% control over our identity in society, what we are seen as by others, in interaction with, and in relation to, society/the world/physical existence is a fool's errand, it is a delusional understanding of reality and existence.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@dariocarraresi1823 I didn't... You did, so I responded to your claim about decreases in assaults on trans people, by showing you the increase in assaults on women, who you seem to think are in no way in need of protecting from violent offenders, who by the vast majority are men-- including those who you refer to as trans women, where in Canada they released some stats about that and another interesting article which addresses it further stating, "In 2017, Trudeau government allowed inmates to transfer from men's to women's prisons based on their self-described gender identity.
Unbeknownst to many Canadians, such a policy is already standard practice in Canada ever since it was introduced by the Trudeau government in 2018 — and has indeed resulted in criminals with lengthy histories of sexual vi0lence against women being housed alongside female inmates.
The government of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon is facing down a major scandal over revelations that her government OK-ed the ability for transgender inmates to transfer to women’s prisons.
The policy soon resulted in several high-profile examples of women’s prison transfers being requested by transgender inmates incarcerated for s3xu@l violence against women. Most notably, this included Isla Bryson, a convicted grapist who attacked two women under the name Adam Graham before changing gender in prison.
“The last few days have exposed Nicola Sturgeon as being completely out of touch with public opinion,” Russell Findlay, Scotland’s shadow community safety minister, said this week.
And so, in a dramatic about-face this week, Sturgeon announced that transgender criminals with “any history” of violence against women could no longer transfer from a men’s to a women’s prison based on their gender self-identification."
You've been wrecked-- just stop the nonsense
3
-
3
-
3
-
@TransHippie I see you typing, but as usual-- not saying anything substantive. I see You come across like a petulant late-teen trying to be edgy.
The problem your ideological narrative will continue to run up against and have no answer for, is that life is based in objective reality, and most people don't have difficulty deciphering reality from your imagination, LARP and cosplay.
It's the trans community which insists that it be validated, affirmed, accepted with compassion by the rest of the majority-- SO, it's for them to make a compelling case, and so far EVERYTHING I've seen from you fails to persuade.
Good Job!! You're like the wrench in your own spokes, and it's the reason no one takes you seriously or treats you with respect.
Respect is earned not owed, and it's reserved for that which is actually respectable.
You come across like a petulant late-teen trying to be edgy. The problem is your comments are substance free and your ideological narratives are incoherent and to believe they're correct requires one to be intellectually bankrupt. They don't stand up to scrutiny, and you fail to persuade.
You have no rational rebuttal of anything. You're the only one who doesn't realize you're wrong. Dudes in a costume, dressed as women= Dude in a dress.
You're only fooling yourself
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Holding one form of gender expression with a preference over another-- isn't the same as recognizing the difference between males and females, boys/men and girls/women, fact and fantasy, or truth over lies.
What they don't have is-- a reasonable expectation to occupy spaces and organizations designated, designed and implemented for females-- just because they make a subjective and unverifiable gender identity claim, doesn't change the fact that the areas they're obsessed with occupying, which are designed for, designated for, and implemented for females are done so based on biology-- Not feelings or socially constructed gender identities
The entire toxic notion of 'trans women' is a fictional metaphysical, unverifiable, subjective, and incoherent ideological talking point, and a counter-culture cult term, that is not based in objective reality, and forces it's religiosity on women, with no right nor rational justification whatsoever.
Can anyone make it make sense?
3
-
3
-
3
-
@TransHippie No, I'm not confused at all dude.
Gender: The status of being either male or female. The entire purpose of the gender/sex division in most species of animal life is to facilitate procreation, the sexual identity of an individual is best classified according to the gametes produced by the person in question. There is no extant third gamete.
Cf. “sex”. Both terms (“gender” and “sex”) originate from Latin words: “genus” (meaning “begin”; “birth”; “kind”; “race”; “gender”) and “sexus” (meaning “sex”; “division”; “gender”).
So, essentially, the only significant distinction between the two terms is that the etymology of “gender” pertains to the beginning of things, as can be plainly seen by the other English words that originate from "genus", such as “generic”, “genetic”, and “generate”, whilst “sex” is a scrupulously-literal translation of the Latin cognate “sexus”.
The mere fact that the word “genitals” (referring to reproductive organs) is very closely related to the Latin “genus” is further evidence of the assertion that the term “gender” refers to the binary division of human (and of course, many non-human) sexual identity, and NOT to any taxonomy based on emotion, feelings, psychology, or any other non-biological categorization schema. ;)
Way too many inappropriately and incorrectly conflate gender/sex (There are only 2-- male/female... That's it) with personality traits and temperament (There are a ton and none are gender exclusive-- hence effeminate males, butch females and tomboys), and again with gender roles (without exception refer to the roles of males and females in society) as though they're synonymous and they are not.
Science has already proven that the binary dichotomy of all mammals is male/female.
A man in a dress is still a man
A man with anxiety about his sex/gender- due to GD- still a man
A man calling himself a woman-- still a man
A man with an effeminate personality--still a man
Now you know better
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@TransHippie Says the creepy dude who advocates for altering those of other people's children.
Why would anyone abandon their culture, traditions, societal norms, and laws in favor of embracing your fringe, cult, counter-culture world view-- which is antithetical to the societies and people which you detest, when you can't/won't/don't show why they should or would embrace an incompatible, and incoherent world view-- which you can't show is superior or an explanation showing it to be preferable.
Not all cultures are equal, compatible, nor desirable... That's why nations have borders-- to maintain and distinguish their culture, traditions, societal norms, and laws from others.
Just sayin...
Your moral relativism means your moral claims aren't superior to anyone else's moral claims
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2