Comments by "Spring Bloom" (@springbloom5940) on "Covert Cabal" channel.

You are wrong about the utter devastation of a modern nuke fight. The modern doctrine is to saturate an area with successive low yield, low level bursts. Similar to the 'rubble bounce' reattack tactic, they use nukes to 'make it glow'; detonating them in a timed shot, to boost each other and saturate the environment with neutrons and hard radiation. The secondary effects ie fallout, could be much worse.
1
Finland and Sweden are not in NATO. That is far from a done deal, despite the official narrative. Russia is not terribly concerned by it, because Finland and Sweden are stable countries, with their own will and self-determination. This differs substantially from Ukraine, which is, to put it bluntly, a puppet state, corrupt to the core and willing to abdicate their own self-preservation, to ingratiate themselves to the US.
1
@speakingwithoutnet Ukraine is smoking fucking crater, filled to the rim with their dead, dude.
1
@borkbork5681 WWII with drones instead of B29s.
1
@Y.M... Yes it did and we won. Now, we are on to WWIV.
1
@GiuseppeAP So, what you're saying, is WWI never ended
1
They never had any intention of taking internal territory, that is purely Western propaganda. Everyone still thinks Ukraine is kicking Russia's ass 🤦
1
@blacksunapocalypse Yes... the Russian propaganda 😒
1
@moist_ointment Good you mentioned that. You do realize that Russia agreed to pull back, as a gesture of faith in negotiations and as they withdrew, came under coordinated attack, across the country, with multiple incursions into sovereign Russian territory? Hours later, the Zelensky gvt denied attacks on Russian soil and declared 2 top generals and an unspecified number of field commanders as traitors. Zekensky claims to have survived multiple assassination attempts... while holed up in his command bunker 🧐 and claims to have 'apprehended' several hundred 'spies' and 'traitors'. How's your math? The Ukrainian military is either acting on its own and or is taking orders from someone other than Zelensky. Bets on who that might be?
1
@blacksunapocalypse Funny, because that exact thing happened in Iraq.
1
@danstrayer111 Are you fucking impaired???
1
@behroozkhaleghirad It means complacency. Our leadership has been completely removed from the privation of real war... like when the enemy actually fights back. If we throwdown with China, or Russia or some other adversary with force projection, none of this super high-tech everything, is going to be maintainable or replaceable. Have we forgotten the shock of battery shortages, early on, in Astan? Now, imagine the enemy doesn't just let you have unfettered access to the air and sea 🤨
1
Red Dawn was a nuclear war.
1
Do 'Magic Wand'
1
@Hagathon Your reading comprehension is poor
1
First rule of warfare: bring a drink and a snack.
1
The US military is virtually invincible. We have tactically dominated every foe, since WWII. Strategically, however, we are uncommitted, as was demonstrated with Vietnam. Politics is our limiting constraint, not capability.
1
@HonorWrought I dont believe I get your point.
1
@HonorWrought Because A) that would happen and B) US would be all on its own. Ok, so, that would also be fairly quick. I have to assume you're talking about a conventional attack, for there to be any utility in the argument. The US is huge, with assets pretty evenly diffused throughout the continent and a significant stationed and deployed force, all around the world, within hours reach of any location on Earth. Long before an attack, they would have to make overt movements that would put NATO on high alert. That massive mobilization has a massive price tag in every aspect, not the least of which is vulnerability. The US alone, has enough raw firepower, to decimate such a force with a first strike. Baghdad 'Shock and Awe' was planned for 3 - 5 days, at that intensity, at dozens of targets around the country. UK and Germany said they wouldn't have any part of it, so it was scaled back to a few hours over Baghdad, to save the coalition. The first month of the Iraq War, was just disposing of old munitions. I was MI in the Gulf War and yes, the Iraqi military was no match for anyone, but no one wouldve faired significantly better against the weaponry and tactics employed. We know the Iraqi ADS were functional and accurate, because they were shooting at the bombs coming off the F117s. TLAM and Harpoons were unstoppable. I worked with a survey team that documented cruise missile targets. We saw structures in heavily defended areas hit multiple times, from multiple directions, with foot-scale precision. We saw structures reduced to rubble and no significant damage to its neighbors. TL;DR Zero chance of pulling off a sneak attack and the US could deliver such a punishing initial blow, it wouldn't be worth trying it. Dude, the Sandbox is the US screwing around and trying to fight a war without hurting anyone's feelings.
1
@HonorWrought And I covered that.
1
@HonorWrought Uh, you are using the word 'realistic' wrong.
1
@HonorWrought What you are describing is a zero sum conflict. By definition it would go nuclear and then all those unstoppable precision weapons will be carrying city busters.
1
You're fighting old wars. A war with Iran, for example, could be as simple as neutralizing significant force projection and then containment . There would be no necessity to 'defeat' it or invade. Its a matter of the objectives.
1
@adama7752 Right, no one should have any rules, beause war, or something 😒
1
@deltaboy2011 Lol
1
@deltaboy2011 Yes... yes, it is 😉
1
@deltaboy2011 Man, you are earning your 50 cents, I'll give you that.
1
 @jon-michaelsampson1120 Damn, so powerful they reach from 30 years in the past.
1
@darth_nihilus_ In the intelligence business, we have kind of a maxim - information is not intelligence, facts do not convey conclusion and you cannot tell the truth with a lie
1
After Desert Storm, I was on a survey team performing onsite BDA at targetd destroyed with guided ordnance. We had two 'civilian' observers, one was definitely a spook and we suspected the other was from a defense contractor. At several sites, the two civilians went in alone and came out with locked boxes that were kept under armed guard. Found out later, they were debris from (at the time) unknown Harpoon variants. They were effective.
1
@leprechaunbutreallyjustamidget Yes and since everyone wants to lol at Russia and compare to the Iraq invasion, consider A) that the US didn't invade Iraq, NATO did and B) how that may have turned out, if China and Russia had dumped their entire stockpile of light weapons, ATGM and MPADS into Iraq?
1
@verden2323 And Iraq is still there and more dangerous than ever.
1
@caribootrails1269 Refused to participate in combat. They did provide support. Every NATO ally was involved in killing Iraqis.
1
@verden2323 🤦
1
Likey far more destructive than a nuke fight.
1