Comments by "PAPAZA TAKLA ATTIRAN İMAM" (@papazataklaattiranimam) on "MasterofRoflness" channel.

  1. And we Turks literally say this: The Turk has no friends other than the Turk.
    2100
  2. Genghis Khan is described as endowed with the highest intellect and a superhuman willpower , which enabled him to unite heterogeneous Turkic and Mongolian tribes into a single whole .
    1800
  3. Germanic* history be like
    986
  4. Baibars ( 1260-77 ) proved himself to be a formidable adversary , unleashing the full force of his military genius on the Crusaders . By the end of his rule he had driven them from Antioch , Krak des Chevaliers and Safita .
    535
  5. There were 4 nations which have managed to defeat the 1200's Mongols in war ; Javanese (Majapahit), Turks (Khalji & Bahri Mamluks), Japanese, Vietnamese (Dai Viet). Mongols of the first half of the 13th century however were unstoppable Major nations destroyed by the Mongols ; -Jin(Tungusic) -Khwarezmids(Turkic) -Souther Song(Sinitic) -Kara Khitais(Khitanic) -Cumania(Turkic) -Kievan Rus(Germanic and Slavic) -Seljuk Rum(Turkic) -Abbasids(Arabic) -Western Xia(Qiangic) -Volga Bulgaria(Turkic)
    400
  6. Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, shaping the history of Balkans, Islamization of Northern India, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire.
    275
  7. When Temüjin was a boy, the center of the steppe world was the Orkhon Valley, the old imperial site of the Türks. The valley was dominated by the Kereit. To the west, on the upper Irtysh River, lay Naiman territory. The Kereit and Naiman, not the Mongols, were masters of the steppe. The Kereit and Naiman elites spoke Turkic and had partially converted to Christianity under the influence of the Nestorian Church. In an effort to out do each other, To'oril of the Kereit and Tayang Qan of the Naiman accumulated men, weapons, alliances, and prestige. Yesügei Ba'atur sided with the Kereit. Later Chinggis Khan would subdue the Kereit and the Naiman in the course of a protracted effort to defeat all challengers among the steppe peoples. The Horde How the Mongols Changed the World Marie Favereau, p.32-33
    194
  8. The great historian Ibn Khaldun also argues in his “Introduction to History” (or The Muqaddimah) that nomadic peoples, the Turks foremost among them, were the most energetic and martial of peoples and that imperial dynasties and regimes emerged from such groups until they became corrupted and softened by civilization and luxury, which resulted in a loss of martial energy and group solidarity. This analysis is very true because as the Abbasid caliphate started to lose its power and influence in the mid-ninth century most of the dynasties that emerged to control the various regions of the Muslim world were founded by Turks, either tribal nomads or former slave soldiers. Ibn Khaldun even attributes the victory of the Muslims over the Mongols to the martial power and energy of the Turks, who formed the elite ranks of the Mamluk armies that defeated the Mongols on several occasions as they attempted to advance into Syria and Egypt between 1260 and 1323.
    190
  9.  @persianguy1524  max poorsian knowledge🤲🏿🤲🏿🤲🏿👳🏾‍♂️👳🏾‍♂️👳🏾‍♂️🍼🍼🍼
    182
  10. Arabic proverb cited by the North African analytic historian Ibn Khaldun of the fourteenth century: dawlah 'ind al-turk, din 'ind al-'arab wa adab 'ind al-furs Power (rests) with the Turk, religion with the Arab, and culture with the Persian.
    168
  11. This is not something to be proud of, on the contrary, it is an example of characterlessness. Alp Arslan had also taken the Roman Emperor prisoner, but he treated him very well, did not humiliate him in any way and finally released him.
    136
  12.  Letnistonwandif Berbers were pumping Iberian women at that time😂😂😂😂😂
    132
  13. Battles described by Herodotus be like
    112
  14. For European observers, the collapse and fragmentation of the empire in the hands of rival dynasts, confirmed a narrative of decadence they had only too enthusiastically dismissed a few years earlier, as Nader Shah had been characterised as the new Alexander. Now as his successors fought over his legacy, Nader Shah was once again reduced to the caricature of the Oriental despot, a salutary lesson to all of the depredations of arbitrary rule.
    107
  15. Nadir idolised the legendary Central Asian conquerors Genghis Khan and Emir Timur and imitated their military prowess and especially later in his reign - their cruelty. Nadir's victories briefly made him the Middle East's most powerful sovereign, but his military spending had a ruinous effect on the economy. This last great Asian military conqueror built a huge empire-stretching from the Indus in what is now Pakistan to the Caucasus mountains in the north, to India in the east-but his reign was marked by remarkable cruelty.
    106
  16. THE TURKS AND THE WEST. Europe stood in awe of the Ottomans who crushed many states and conquered vast territories, going, as all patriotic Turks will proudly point out, "all the way to the gates of Vienna." European literature is replete with the depictions of the Turk as the hated enemy. The English often thought of the Turk as awe-inspiring and destructive. Thomas Fuller wrote in The Holy Warre (1639): "The Turkish Empire is the greatest... the sun ever saw. ...Grass springeth not where the grand signior's horse setteth his foot."
    99
  17. You forgot about 999 Turkic tribal migrations 😅
    93
  18. Arab dominance did not, however, continue in the political sphere, and one may describe the premodern history of Islam as falling into three periods of political regime. Until the tenth cen- tury, most regions of Islamdom were under the rule of Arabs; in the 10th and 11th centuries, many regions came under the rule of Persians; and from the 11th until the 19th century, almost all areas of the Muslim world were ruled by ethnic Turks or Mongols, whose dominance continued in the Middle East until World War I and the abolishment of the Ottoman Empire in 1924. For nearly a millennium in the Persianate world, the upper echelons of society were seen as divided along ethnic lines into Turks, who constituted the military and ruling class, and Tajiks, Persians, or non-Turks, who were the administrators, accountants, tax-collectors, and land owners. The division was viewed as natural and not unfair because Turks and Mongols were considered ethnically suited to military exploits because of their sturdiness, fierce nature, ability to endure hardship, and superior skills in horsemanship and archery. Even in contexts where Turks did not make up the bulk of the military, rul- ers often used troops belonging to foreign ethnic groups because of their military skills, internal solidarity, lack of attachment to the local populace, and direct allegiance to the ruler. The Fatimids in Egypt (969-1171) employed both troops who belonged to the Berber Kutama tribal confederation from North Africa and "Suda- nese" troops from sub-Saharan Africa. The 14th-century historian Ibn Khaldun argued, reflecting primarily on the Berber dynasties of North Africa, that there was a strong relationship between the life of political regimes and ethnic groups. Tribal groups from outside settled regions have much stronger ethnic solidarity than settled peoples, and this enabled them to work as efficient military units, conquering territories and establishing new dynasties. The settled life of the conquerors, however, corrupted them and made them lose their ethnic solidarity in just a few generations, and this made them vulnerable to new tribal invaders.
    88
  19. Then they heard some THROAT SINGING
    88
  20.  @dark_boy_86samadyar96  Or Ghaznavids vs Seljuks, Khazars vs Bulgars, Cumans vs Pechenegs, Qara Qoyunlu vs Aq Qoyunlu, Uzun Hasan vs Mehmed II, Uyghurs vs Second Göktürks…
    81
  21.  @ChevyChase301  Mongols only assimilated some Turkic, Khitanic and Tungusic tribes in the time of Khamag Khanate and Genghis Khan, they assimilated nobody after that. On the contrary, they began to assimilate themselves. They became Turkic and Sinitic.
    80
  22. Turks indeed had a decisive role in triggering historical major events like the Migration Period, Crusades, Age of Discovery as well as ending the Middle Ages with the conquest of Constantinople, fall of the Roman Empire. The Turks were considered as the best warriors due to their horsemanship and skill in archery. Kaushik Roy., n.d. Military Transition in Early Modern Asia, 1400-1750: Cavalry, Guns, Government and Ships (Bloomsbury Studies in Military History). p.24. The Turks too , the great warriors of the steppes , were almost haughty in the assumption that they inherited the jihad fighting spirit of the tradition and carried it half - way into Europe . Turko-Persia in Historical Perspective p.94 The Seljukian Turks had had some great warriors ; the period of their power was during the eleventh and twelfth centuries ; they had taken the place of the Arabs as the great Moslem power of the east , though an Arab caliph still nominally reigned at Baghdad . The Divine Aspect of History Volume 2 p.324 In the west the Seljuq invasion of Asia Minor began the process which was to make it the modern land of the Turks and the base from which the greatest Islamic empire of the past 600 years would expand into southeast Europe . MacEachern, S., 2010. The new cultural atlas of the Islamic world. p.32. THE TURKS AND THE WEST. Europe stood in awe of the Ottomans who crushed many states and conquered vast territories, going, as all patriotic Turks will proudly point out, "all the way to the gates of Vienna." European literature is replete with the depictions of the Turk as the hated enemy. The English often thought of the Turk as awe-inspiring and destructive. Thomas Fuller wrote in The Holy Warre (1639): "The Turkish Empire is the greatest... the sun ever saw. ...Grass springeth not where the grand signior's horse setteth his foot." Halman, T. and Warner, J., 2007. Rapture and revolution. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, Crescent Hill Publications, p.9. During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries , understanding the Turks ' military organization , given the credit for the greatest empire since antiquity , became a major European preoccupation . Speake, J., n.d. Literature of travel and exploration. p.891. By the middle of the 16th century, the Turks arguably possessed the greatest empire in the world. A History of the Middle East Paperback – March 15, 2006 by Saul S. Friedman (Author) p.181
    72
  23. Result: 30 billion casualties
    62
  24. Être fort comme un Turc (‘to be strong like a turk’): This expression originates in the 15th century when the Turks had a reputation for being strong, almost unbeatable warriors due to their numerous victories. At the time, the Ottoman Empire ruled large parts of south-east Europe, north Africa and western Asia. It is said that François I, King of France, was gifted Turkish armour by Suleiman the Magnificent (the tenth and most famous sultan of the Ottoman Empire) during their alliance. When he wore it, he is said to have exclaimed: “Here I am now, strong as a Turk!”.
    62
  25.  Andres Garcia  Greeks??? Even Greeks themselves are not largely hellenic by blood
    58
  26.  Letnistonwandif ​​⁠ Although the Turks often comprised the bulk of the Mongol army as well as the bulk of armies opposed to the Mongols, throughout the domains of the Mongol Empire there was a diffusion of military technology, which has already bee and also ethnic groups. In addition to the Mongols and Turks, other ethnicities served in the Mongol military machine and found themselves distant from home. May, T.M., 2012. The Mongol conquests in world history, London: Reaktion Books. p.222 The earliest reference to the Mongols classifies them as a Tang dynasty tribe of Shiwei during the eighth century. It was only after the fall of the Liao dynasty in 1125 that they became an important tribe on the Central Asian steppe, but tribal wars weakened their power over the ensuing century. During the thirteenth century, the term Mongol was used to refer to the Mongolic and Turkic tribes who fell under the control of Genghis Khan. The Mongols are primarily a shamanist society; their central deity is the sky god Tenger. Native Peoples of the World: An Encyclopedia of Groups, Cultures and Contemporary Issues By Steven L. Danver, p.225 When Temüjin was a boy, the center of the steppe world was the Orkhon Valley, the old imperial site of the Türks. The valley was dominated by the Kereit. To the west, on the upper Irtysh River, lay Naiman territory. The Kereit and Naiman, not the Mongols, were masters of the steppe. The Kereit and Naiman elites spoke Turkic and had partially converted to Christianity under the influence of the Nestorian Church. In an effort to out do each other, To'oril of the Kereit and Tayang Qan of the Naiman accumulated men, weapons, alliances, and prestige. Yesügei Ba'atur sided with the Kereit. Later Chinggis Khan would subdue the Kereit and the Naiman in the course of a protracted effort to defeat all challengers among the steppe peoples. The Horde How the Mongols Changed the World Marie Favereau, p.32-33
    55
  27. Ultra angry Italian invader noises
    49
  28. Être fort comme un Turc (‘to be strong like a turk’): This expression originates in the 15th century when the Turks had a reputation for being strong, almost unbeatable warriors due to their numerous victories. At the time, the Ottoman Empire ruled large parts of south-east Europe, north Africa and western Asia. It is said that François I, King of France, was gifted Turkish armour by Suleiman the Magnificent (the tenth and most famous sultan of the Ottoman Empire) during their alliance. When he wore it, he is said to have exclaimed: “Here I am now, strong as a Turk!”.
    49
  29. One of the most impressive portraits is that of Nur-ad-Din, emir of Aleppo and Damascus. William credited him with foresight and circumspec tion, with wisdom and restraint in his judgment, and with prudence. He con sidered Nur-ad-Din to be a just, godfearing, religious, and hence happy, blessed man (justus, timens Deum, religiosus, felix). These traits, comple mented by intelligence, imaginativeness and vigor, qualified him as both an excellent leader of the Muslims and a dangerous opponent of the Christians. William was very much aware of this discrepancy. However, he did not pres ent the two sides separately; rather, he integrated these qualities in a rounded portrait. Thus, in what amounts to an obituary, William noted on the death of the prince: "Nur-ad-Din (is dead), the greatest persecutor of the Christian name and faith, yet a just, shrewd and provident man, and religious accord ing to his people's tradition." It seems to me that William of Tyre has thus acknowledged the Muslim leader as a religious person. One is reminded of St. Peter's speech in the house of the Roman centurion Cornelius in Cae sarea, who is said in the Acts to be a vir religiosus, timens Deum (Acts, 10:2) and justus (Acts, 10:22): "But in every nation he that fears him, and works righteousness, is accepted with him" (Acts, 10:35)". This idea has not ex actly had a great influence on the Christian's external relationships. It is all the more remarkable to find one of its advocates on the scene during the Crusades. Some of his battle victories: Siege of Edessa (1146) Fall of Turbessel Battle of Harim Battle of Lake Huleh (1157) Battle of Inab Battle of Aintab First Crusader invasion, 1163 Second Crusader invasion, 1164
    47
  30. Neither Holy Nor Roman Nor an Empire
    42
  31. Roman Empire > all bigger doesn’t mean better
    36
  32.  @ahmetcihankara4589  Persians were nobody after collapse of Sasanians🤣 That’s why persian kids are so jealous about Turkic history. Some small hellenic and arabic bois completely destroyed them😭
    36
  33.  @umutmakascoglu2705  Turks never got Arabized. Being Jarab was even insult among us.
    36
  34. Superpower in the time of Timur
    36
  35. We must consider the fact that, from about 977 until 1925, hence for about 1,000 years, Turkish (and Mongolian) dynasties reigned over Iran. The Turkish vocabulary in Persian belongs preponderantly to the fields of government ate, law, army, warfare, armaments, and booty. Turkish was the language of the soldiers and the court. While the court of Delhi, i.e., the Turkish court of India, spoke Persian, the official language of the Safavi court (six teenth century onward) was Azerbaijan Turkish, so that Kaempfer¹⁹ remarked in 1685 "ut pene nunc turpe sit in Persiâ viro alicujus nominis ignorare Turcicam . . . ita ab exteris diligitur quae in ipsâ patriâ sordet magnatibus," "that it is almost ugly in Persia for a man of any renown to ignore Turkish, and so that [the Persian language] is esteemed abroad which in its own country is despised by the noble men." Many aristocratic titles were Turkish, just as the English titles Hovannisian, R. and Sabagh, G., 1998. The Persian presence in the Islamic world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.240.
    34
  36.  @bghn4114  cap
    33
  37.  @persianguy1524  🤲🏿🤲🏿🤲🏿👳🏾‍♂️👳🏾‍♂️👳🏾‍♂️
    32
  38. Although the Turks often comprised the bulk of the Mongol army as well as the bulk of armies opposed to the Mongols, throughout the domains of the Mongol Empire there was a diffusion of military technology, which has already bee and also ethnic groups. In addition to the Mongols and Turks, other ethnicities served in the Mongol military machine and found themselves distant from home. May, T.M., 2012. The Mongol conquests in world history, London: Reaktion Books. p.222
    31
  39.  ALP  sil
    31
  40. The Zand dynasty, which ruled Iran from 1751 to 1794 , was the first native Iranian regime in almost six hundred years, as opposed to the Turkic and Mongolian sovereigns who until then had governed the land. Frye, R. (2009). Zand Dynasty. In The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. : Oxford University Press. For nearly a thousand years, Iran has generally been ruled by non-Persian dynasties, usually Turkish. Bosworth, C. (1968). THE POLITICAL AND DYNASTIC HISTORY OF THE IRANIAN WORLD (A.D. 1000–1217). In J. Boyle (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Iran (The Cambridge History of Iran, pp. 1-202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521069366.002
    31
  41. "The decision of the Albanian government authorities TO HIDE THE STATUE OF SKENDERBEG EVERY TIME A MEETING WITH TURKISH OFFICIALS TAKES PLACE is surely sending perplexing messages to Albanian people." Perparim Xhaferi, 2019 "Albanian National Identity in the twenty-first century: Escaping from the Ottoman heritage?", University of Sydney, pp. 202
    30
  42. Angry Chinese and American noises
    30
  43.  @bghn4114  another cap🧢
    29
  44. Être fort comme un Turc (‘to be strong like a turk’): This expression originates in the 15th century when the Turks had a reputation for being strong, almost unbeatable warriors due to their numerous victories. At the time, the Ottoman Empire ruled large parts of south-east Europe, north Africa and western Asia. It is said that François I, King of France, was gifted Turkish armour by Suleiman the Magnificent (the tenth and most famous sultan of the Ottoman Empire) during their alliance. When he wore it, he is said to have exclaimed: “Here I am now, strong as a Turk!”.
    28
  45.  @lolasdm6959  Turkic peoples= Small population but still expanded and ruled big area Sinitic peoples= Crowd population small area
    28
  46. Our history is older so Mongolia=Turks 2.0
    26
  47. Long live Ottoman Empire and Turkiye🇹🇷 Best Muslim Empire in history and one of the best empires in history.
    25
  48.  @shehzadadarashikoh9463  Ottoman Empire defeated and destroyed European superpowers while Mughals couldn’t even cope with some Jats, Rajputs and Marathis🤣
    24
  49. 0:19 Based Northern Nomadic Tribes 🌝
    24
  50. The Kashmirian historian Lateef described him as follows: "Nader Shah, the horror of Asia, the pride and savior of his country, the restorer of her freedom and conqueror of India, who, having a simple origin, rose to such greatness that monarchs rarely have from birth". Joseph Stalin used to read about Nader Shah and admired him, calling him, along with Ivan the Terrible, a teacher. In Europe, Nader Shah was compared to Alexander the Great. Starting from a young age, Napoleon Bonaparte also used to read about and admire Nader Shah. Napoleon considered himself new Nader, and he himself was later called European Nader Shah Some of his Battle Victories: Khorasan Campaign (1726-1727) Battle of Sangan (1727) Sabzevar expedition (1727-1728) Restoration of Tahmasp II to the Safavid throne (1729) Liberation of Isfahan (1729) Western Persia campaign of 1730 Caucasus Campaign (1735) Siege of Kandahar (1737) Afsharid Conquests in the Persian Gulf & Oman (1730-1747) Nader Shah's invasion of India (1738-1740) Nader Shah's Conquest of Central Asia (1737-1740) Nader's campaigns in Dagestan (1741-1745) Battle of Damghan (1729) Battle of Khwar Pass (1729) Battle of Murche-Khort (1729) Battle of Zarghan (1730) The Battle of Malayer Valley (1730) Battle of Kirkuk (1733) The Siege of Mashad (1726-1727) Nader's Conquest of Khorasan (1726-1727) Herat Campaign (1729) Rebellion of Sheikh Ahmad Madani (1730) Herat Campaign of 1731 Mohammad Khan Baluch's Rebellion (1733) Siege of Ganja (1734) Battle of Yeghevārd (1735) Submission of Eastern Georgia Nader Shah`s (1735) Battle of Khyber Pass (1738) Battle of Karnal (1739) Nader's Sindh Expedition (1739) Moḥammad Taqi Khan Shirazi's Rebellion (1744) Battle of Kars (1745) Battle of Kafer Qal'eh (1729) Capture of Ghazni The Siege of Kabul Sack of Jalalabad Capture of Peshawar Capture of Lahore
    22