Comments by "Solo Renegade" (@SoloRenegade) on "Steve Lehto" channel.

  1.  @SteelHex  yeah, sounds like blackmail to me. How is that a mutually beneficial contract by law? what does the employee get from that?
    1
  2.  @SteelHex  And what is it's purpose? to trample on the rights of the employee? The states that don't honor them, do so because they recognize how utterly ridiculous the whole idea is and how utterly one-sided and unfair it is. And in contract law, a one sided contract is not legally binding.
    1
  3.  @SteelHex  it's not possible for most employees to "not sign" it. Most non-competes are part of the employment contract. refuse to sign and you don't get the job. it's usually baked into the terms of employment, not a separate contract. Many never even knew they "signed" a non compete. Also, what constitutes a "non compete" situation?
    1
  4.  @SteelHex  yes, but some industries are so specialized, people can't not work in their industry for a year. And no, not everyone understands legalese even if they read it.
    1
  5.  @SteelHex  it's not reasonable to expect everyone to be well versed in all aspects of life. Some people are jacks of all trades, some are subject matter experts, some are a bit autistic about certain things, etc. It's not fair to expect the average person to be prepared to go against a team of lawyers. And it's not reasonable to expect the average person to know all teh laws and nuances when even whole teams of lawyers struggle at times to figure this stuff out.
    1
  6.  @SteelHex  just because someone misses something, or doesn't understand it, doesn't make them lazy. I know you don't read all the fine print for a credit card, airline ticket, website terms of service, etc. (and even if you did, you're in an extreme minority). So stop demanding others be perfect, when even you don't read everything. Anti-competitive behavior is anti-capitalist. Anti-competitive behaviors are generally banned in the US. One-sided contracts are not legally binding in the US.
    1
  7. you can't confiscate my house to get my sidewalk camera footage of a neighbor getting broken into without either my consent, or a warrant. and then, you can't kick me out of my home until the case is over, you only need the digital file, nothing else. Same goes for the cars.
    1
  8. RIGHT?!?!
    1
  9. Doctor comes from Doctorate, as in Doctorate Degree. it has literally NOTHING to do with medicine. the title Doctor is bestowed upon literally Anyone who earns a doctoral degree in any subject. Philosophy, history, engineering, math, physics, etc. PhD = Doctorate of Philosophy MD = Doctorate of Medicine Medical doctors are a subset of the larger group of doctors. They do not have sole rights to that title. and if it's so confusing, then medical doctors, if anyone, should be stripped of the right to use that title if they feel it's causing so much confusion, as it is medical people who have co-opted the term improperly in teh first place.
    1
  10. cars are a form of shelter, period, and must be acknowledged and treated as such.
    1
  11. they did this with Semis, and it caused safety issues.
    1
  12. vegans = mental illness
    1
  13. pirate radios aren't common in the US because they are so easy to detect, and track. and legal radio operators help track them down.
    1
  14.  @no_peace  a license that costs more than the car costs.
    1
  15.  @FreebirthBoccara  Mostly right, but you're also wrong. US gov must accept it as a form of settling debts. if it's all they have, it MUST be accepted. it's not the Only acceptable form, but they cannot refuse to accept it as payment of debt if that's all they have.
    1
  16.  @jamesmason2228  no, just for you.
    1
  17. my private property is not your free billboard
    1
  18. Did he make a low pass down the street in a P-51?
    1
  19. this needs to go up the chain. this is not ok and not constitutional.
    1
  20.    less profit =/= unprofitable
    1
  21. stupidest law ever
    1
  22. so if crowds are too large on sidewalks, that I have to stop to wait for an opening, I can now get everyone who impeded me arrested?
    1
  23. CA is a communist state, this is how communism works
    1
  24.  @catreecemacleod7556  "Like 1/2 the people you interact with won't be stupider than you are probably just because you don't really get to run into the people who are really, really dumb that often. They can't function in basic society for the most part, so you're probably not going to encounter them. " not true, they are out there every day. If you understand statistics you'll know that the majority of people are distributed about the mean, meaning most people I meet each day are very near average. "Also, the more complicated a task you're doing, the less likely you are to encounter them" you have a point there. "so something like just reading the youtube comments is a pretty big buffer because they need to be literate and know how to use a computer at a basic level for you to really encounter someone on here for instance." most people can read and write, you're more likely to meet relatively dumb people on the internet than anywhere else. "So the chances are that it's less than half the people you'll interact with will be stupider than you are. In fact, given the people you interact with will often be people like your family doctor, your pharmacist, teachers and other professionals, you'll find a lot of them will be above average, so this makes it again even more unlikely. " I don't have a doctor or pharmacist. I'm actually so healthy I self diagnose myself even while in teh doctor's office, and they agree with me. I'm smart enough to not need a doctor and only go as required for periodic physicals required for the work I do. I almost never see the same doctor twice. While in college I taught the classes better than the professors did, so much so the professors thought I was one of their coworkers. I have been offered a job as a college professor multiple times, I did teach at a college for a time, I mentor people all teh time though on teh side, in math, history, engineering, physics, etc. I'm one of the top in my profession where I work, and it's a very small field and highly competitive. But I know where I stand on the distribution, I have proven it so many times over now in more than one way too. I score in the top 1% not just intellectually, but performance-wise too, and have scored there since grade school. I guarantee you 99% of the people I meet each day are, relatively speaking, "dumber" than me. I take no pride in that, I think the average person is nearly as capable as me. There is nothing I know or can do I can't teach to someone else. But I beat people by besting them in every category overall, not just any one. I am not the best in the world at any one thing I can do either (I easily could, if I focused all my energy on just that thing for enough years), again my advantage lies in the overall abilities. But it gives me a strange perspective knowing this. Call it arrogance, but it's not arrogance when you can and have backed it up time and again. I know my limits, but also what I'm capable of. "The question becomes more about how often do you go to McDonald's or Walmart, for your chances for that 1 out of 2 people statistic to come true." people watching can be fun, and annoying too. " it means you will probably never encounter the dumbest people.", oh but I have, and do. It's not that hard, unless you're a shut-in.
    1
  25. historically, US citizens in a community would exercise their 2A rights and deal with corrupt gov officials like this. Trial by jury of peers.
    1
  26. if you don't possess a deed or legal contract, you are not the legal resident of a residence. PERIOD
    1
  27. the airlines are psychologically abusing and torturing people, and holding them against their will in unlawful detention.
    1
  28. he needs to request jury trial. if judge doesn't toss it out people will.
    1
  29.  @JeanPierreWhite  "However the exclusionary rule ONLY applies to criminal cases." If you haven't committed a crime, then why are you in court facing charges? Seems the gov is admitting those other cases, no crime was committed, and thus no charges nor trial should be taking place in the first place.
    1
  30.  @JeanPierreWhite  good point. but that wasn't my point. My point is that illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible in court. All cases are criminal cases of some sort, otherwise you wouldn't be in court. It doesn't matter why you ended up in court, or what you're accused of, or who accused you. You can only be prosecuted if you broke a law. that is therefore a criminal case. if no crime (or alleged crime) was committed, then there is no trial.
    1
  31.  @JeanPierreWhite  don't care, it doesn't make it right. just makes the judge, lawyers, and ruling, wrong.
    1
  32.  @JeanPierreWhite  " Yes it has weakened the 4th amendment right, but at the moment it's perfectly legal." Case law: laws repugnant to the US Constitution, or in violation of the US Constitution, are void. Just because the gov is breaking the law, doesn't make it right, nor does it make it legal. Anything that violates the Constitution is unlawful, void, illegal.
    1
  33.  @JeanPierreWhite  "It is not void until ruled void." the US Constitution and SCOTUS already ruled it void. If you're a lawyer, I pity your clients.
    1
  34.  @JeanPierreWhite  You shouldn't be giving legal advice if you have no clue about this. Marbury v. Madison (1803)
    1
  35.  @JeanPierreWhite  "The supreme court is the final word on interpreting the constitution, not you or I" I can read the US Constitution as well as SCOTUS can, if not better. It doesn't take a law degree to comprehend. And It's not hard to read the Founder's letters and arguments to comprehend what they meant. a child can do it. Most court rulings these todays are so childishly bad that no one trusts the "justice" system anymore. proving the courts indeed CANNOT interpret the Constitution better then the average citizen can. Stop acting like law is something the common man can't grasp. If it is truly is as complicated as you sh1t for brains gate keeping lawyers try to imply, then it's too complex for the common man to comply with and we need to just nullify and ignore all of it.
    1
  36. no to digital license plates
    1
  37. another stupid law that should not ever nor need to exist at all.
    1
  38. ink =/= intellectual property and even if it was, they should be happy I'm buying alternate ink to avoid their intellectual property getting stolen.
    1
  39. any court that cannot release a person proven to be innocent is not a legitimate court!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    1
  40. how could they NOT win? Warrantless Searches are unconstitutional!
    1
  41. I have copies of older LARGE dictionaries, in order to Prove they changed definitions of words like "fascism".
    1
  42. this would have been ok as a properly notified "opt in" ONLY program. But the way they did it was theft.
    1
  43. didn't know having a medical condition was a crime....
    1
  44. And treason. civil asset forfeiture is unconstitutional!
    1
  45. this should be applied solely to politicians.
    1
  46. you bought the car, you own it, and it's capabilities. Horsepower is NOT a service.
    1
  47. how many people LIVE out of their cars?
    1
  48. gov confiscate the property, and auction it to the public at market value.
    1
  49. arrest FEMA then too, pretty sure they dont have FL licenses
    1
  50. no one was harmed by cancelling the contract, but a crime was committed by stealing and killing the animal.
    1