Comments by "Solo Renegade" (@SoloRenegade) on "Steve Lehto" channel.

  1. the college textbook racket is criminal
    1
  2. burden of proof is the responsibility of the accuser
    1
  3. free speech violation
    1
  4. what if you're looking for a friend sleeping in their car? what is the minimum distance from the car before looking is considered "peering"? this is stupid and illegal to implement. This will not stop ANYTHING! People looking =/= people stealing
    1
  5. the only authority over airspace is the FAA
    1
  6.  @mhhuusko  I agree. when a crime is committed, a number of innocent people might be arrested until the prime suspect is identified. All are treated as criminals merely for being arrested, even if their only "crime" was being in the vicinity of where the crime was committed and matching a vague description.
    1
  7. Gov reps should be required to pass a test for the lvel of gov they are campaigning for, before campaigning.
    1
  8. lots of incompetent doctors and lawyers out there too. remember COVID and how all teh doctors and nurses lied and pushed drugs for profit? How they killed people through misdiagnosis and lied on death certificates? or how they turned people away who needed urgent care due to "COVID"? How they lied to people how safe the vax was? don't act like a doctor is anything more than a modern day snake oil salesman with political objectives. if doctors cared about your health they'd be telling you the truth about diet, cancer, sugar, fat and protein, and more.
    1
  9.  @tvviewer4500  that's fine, my research shows it's not a thing. You have no cases to cite in support of your made up argument. Asking someone to prove a negative is an invalid argument, and even more so asking your opposition to prove your argument For you.
    1
  10. I've worked hard for my money, VERY HARD, and no one deserves it but me.
    1
  11. Doctors are self-absorbed self-important pill-pushing drug dealers and have NO right to co-opt the term "Doctor". Anyone with a Doctorate is a "Doctor" and has EVERY RIGHT to use that term. It is a Constitutional violation of free speech for someone to use a title they have rightfully EARNED.
    1
  12. this gives the gov authority to control the press and will also infringe on basic free speech in the end.
    1
  13. sounds like abuse of power to me
    1
  14. that's extortion.
    1
  15. CA is trying to ban cars
    1
  16. most guilty pleas are coerced, everyone knows this
    1
  17. This is theft, and randomly flying helicopters low level in national forests are going to be getting a call from the FAA. Wilderness areas have a 2000ft minimum altitude requirement.
    1
  18. only just figuring that out?
    1
  19. 20 lashes and financial penalties..... pain is a great teacher and deterent.
    1
  20. Society and rule of law only works when run by smart moral people.
    1
  21. what about Obama's birth certificate and that female congresswoman who committed fraud to become a citizen?
    1
  22. paint is peeling off license plates now too......gov cheaping out. thankfully the cops seem to be aware of it and not going after people.
    1
  23. motorcycles are totally understandable. you are your own crumple zone if you were overly trusting of other drivers.
    1
  24. One way i determine if a car is going to turn (intersection, turning to leave a roundabout, etc.), is looking at the front tires. Which way are the front tires pointing/moving.
    1
  25. contract law requires all contracts to be mutually beneficial, not one-sided. Also, it's not a contract unless both people agreed to it.
    1
  26. arrest the city officials
    1
  27. gov cannot regulate free speech. it is not fraud to say you are a doctor, when you are in fact a doctor. and medical doctorates do NOT get to co-opt the entire use of "doctor" for themselves.
    1
  28. and that's why free speech is so important, to shed light on corruption and bring about change.
    1
  29. 8:40 voiding a warranty is One thing. disabling private property is another thing. I don't care if they void a warranty, but i care if they destroy/disable my private property.
    1
  30. One-sided contracts are not legally binding in the US.
    1
  31. Driver's license is NOT an outlier Pilot's License (I have 3 separate FAA licenses I have to carry at times). CCW license (unconstitutional to need a permit just to exercise my guaranteed freedoms ANYWHERE in the US). Access/Security Badges are a form of license (I have many of these, such as airport security, employer security, and such I have to carry on me). FCC HAM radio, Radiotelephone, etc. licenses have physical versions (I have multiple of these I carry). etc. many examples if you look for them. my wallet is full of the many licenses I possess. In the US you must physically possess your license and a gov photo ID to fly. so if you lost your license OR gov ID you can't legally fly. Now, would a person still do it to fly home and request a new one? most likely yes, assuming they don't get caught. Try carrying concealed without your CCW license in hand......see how well that goes.
    1
  32. now it's not just theft and a 4th amendment violation, it's a conspiracy.
    1
  33. how is the infrastructure going to handle this increase in demand for electricity?
    1
  34.  @thano8499  Well, that should make it easier for them then. US lacks sufficient electrical grid power generation to convert all cars to electric by 2030/2035. California can't even power all their homes right now. Seems NYC can't supply enough power either, telling people to turn off their AC.
    1
  35.  @thano8499  Rolling blackouts are the result of a lack of power, not a lack of consumption. Same with telling people to turn off their AC. That's a lack of energy Production. Solar energy in the US is only accounts for 2.3% of electricity production. Solar is a lie, SMR nuclear is the future. There are grid storage solutions already in existence, so CA has no excuse. Lowering and lifting mass as a battery is the most efficient grid storage, and uses decades old tech, and no exotic materials, and can be mass produced now. But CA is also broke, they keep spending all their money on pensions and free money for people.
    1
  36.  @thano8499  I've never heard of CA having excess solar power. If they did they'd surely be bragging about it in the news. Putting up the powerlines to move solar energy is not a new idea. The CA blackouts are a result of mismanagement. Other states have no such issues integrating their power generation, including coal, natural gas, nuclear, solar and wind.
    1
  37.  @thano8499  Then why aren't they building grid storage? and why aren't they throttling the "big bad" coal/gas powerplants when solar is overproducing. This isn't rocket science, and we have known how to manage mixed energy like this for decades. I don't see AZ having a problem with their solar power. I don't see AZ having rolling blackouts. This argument is garbage.
    1
  38.  @thano8499  Build gravity storage, not lithium. Wow people are uninformed. Gravity storage is cheaper, safer, and more efficient. More excuses
    1
  39.  @kais.8689  Basic electricity and thermodynamics of power grids is far simpler than rockets. Don't try to inflate your ego and insult everyone else's. Every other state is handling integrated power technologies and such just fine. No rolling blackouts and such.
    1
  40.  @kais.8689  Bold statement coming from someone who knows nothing about rockets or power grids. dates don't equate to knowledge nor complexity. try again.
    1
  41.  @thano8499  Did I say pumped hydro? No, you did. You clearly know very little about energy storage technologies.
    1
  42. how is $500mil distributed to investors a "penalty"?
    1
  43. Does this also apply to police? Are police forbidden from peering into parked cars? or peering into a car when pulled over and stopped on the road?
    1
  44. the first 2 initials of my name are MD, and I often put my name down using my first two initials and my last name just to mess with people. and I have every right to do so, as at no point am i offering medical services nor claiming to be a medical doctor, I'm using my legal name. I just allow people's own minds misled themselves.
    1
  45. WHEN WILL POLICE BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR CRIMES?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?
    1
  46. drug trafficking, coercion, abuse of authority, conspiracy, withholding evidence, etc. charge the attorney and the cops.
    1
  47. 100% of everything can be construed into something inappropriate
    1
  48.  @thisnamewerx0350  "The point is chatGPT mostly cannot slander others only people who use chatgpt as a source can do that" wrong. a person uses ChatGPT, and it tells them some person named, Joe, is a rapist, when in reality he is not. But the user doesn't know that and believes it to be true, and anyone who asks about Joe is told the same. And so this message spreads far and wide without Joe even knowing it initially. But Joe has now been slandered the same as if a major news outlet had printed it in an article, just like how many major news outlets are already publishing articles written by AI. Joe has been slandered, and the owner of the outlet that is actively slandering him is now liable. And Joe never once used ChatGPT, but his reputation has been destroyed, he's now lost his job because users believed the slander. Open shut case.
    1
  49.  @jobney  That one would go differently, as the action taken was on the part of the business owner.
    1
  50.  @floridaman6982  it is a problem, as ChatGPT doesn't share its sources, and writes things not on other sites. It makes up responses Based upon other sites, but not carbon copies. And since it doesn't cite its sources, is liable for anything it writes. If i google something and find a website slandering me, One, I don't blame google I blame the creator of the website, and two I absolutely can sue the website that is slandering me. Google takes me to the source, ChatGPT is it's own source since it refuses to share where it got its info (I've asked it multiple times before).
    1