Comments by "Solo Renegade" (@SoloRenegade) on "Steve Lehto" channel.

  1. mail in ballots should be banned except in specific cases, and with great oversight. And voting day should be added to the national/federal holiday list if that would help people vote in person. If you can't be bothered to show up in person, then you should just accept you wont get to vote. Laziness is not an excuse.
    1
  2.  @grahvis  did you even read anything I said? "mail in ballots should be banned except in specific cases, and with great oversight." right in the very first line. Work on your reading and comprehension skills. You're making a fool of yourself. "You would make voting conditional." nowhere in my comment did I say that, but now that you mention it, YES, some people should not be allowed to vote. they can't even do basic math, don't possess basic comprehension skills and don't even know how economics, foreign policy, trade, rule of law and any other thing related to gov works. so those people should not be allowed to vote since they don't even know what they are voting for in the first place and don't care enough to educate themselves either.
    1
  3.  @grahvis  yes, they could mail in vote, on the CONDITION they meet one of the Qualifying exceptions. you're grasping here and arguing over trivialities. You gave a Single example, of a person, any person, without "transportation". You do know that people can get a ride, all they have to do is ask? There are entire groups that offer free rides for just this purpose. Even local govs sometimes have side ride services they offer for free. There is no excuse for why you can't get to the polls. Or, you can just accept that you wont get to vote. Many people chose not to vote every single year of their own free will. But if they have no transport, how do they also go places to take care of bills, buy things, etc.? If my grandparents can get around, then anyone can.
    1
  4. what gives the banks the LEGAL authority to seize people's assets!??!?!?!? Chase bank is NOT a gov authortiy!
    1
  5. isn't it up to the customer to determine if they feel victimized, not some stupid sheriff?
    1
  6. speeding tickets are outside DNR jurisdiction.
    1
  7. Civil Asset Forfeitures is NOT Constitutional!!!!
    1
  8. absolutely. and if someone doesn't think so they need to spend time with military personnel.
    1
  9.  @fettel1988  wrong. you get charged with perjury, THEN you get a court date.
    1
  10. lying is 2A protected speech for citizens. lying should Not be allowed for people in positions of gov authority and employment.
    1
  11. illegal. anti-competitive behavior is illegal in the US
    1
  12.  @grandinosour  never
    1
  13. civil asset forfeiture is unconstitutional!
    1
  14. but the gov declared theft no longer a crime.......
    1
  15. the shop took responsibility for the vehicle, they are liable, not the customer.
    1
  16. arrest these people for kidnapping, wrongful imprisonment, and theft.
    1
  17. grand theft auto is a crime, and they need to be prosecuted.
    1
  18. this is armed robbery
    1
  19. this is not law enforcement in teh slightest. it's a complete LIE.
    1
  20. round up all the feral and unowned dogs in police custody then...
    1
  21. civil asset forfeiture is unconstitutional!
    1
  22.  @neoqwerty  I get your idealism. I too used to feel the same way. But I have come to accept the reality that is human psychology, and it actually has Nothing to do with people wanting to speed, nor with people being jerks. It's about managing basic human perceptions. it goes deeper than you claim, just oversimplifying things and blaming "speeders" doesn't solve anything. Accepting reality and working around reality solves the problem and results in fewer issues, fewer car accidents, more polite driving overall, etc. Often times, the issue doesn't even involve a single person who is speeding at all. Most traffic jams for example, are caused by people doing the "slinky", and nothing else. when you have 10 cars in a line, the car at the front might be going 57mph, and the car at the rear is only going 51mph and is getting annoyed because the speed limit is 55pmh.and if the person in front instead went 55mph, the guy in back is doing more like 50mph or less. and now he's really pissed people aren't keeping their speed up, not knowing why people are really going slow. Also, you lose FAR more time going slow, than you can make up by speeding. If the speed limit is 55mph and you're stuck doing 50mph for 10miles, you'd have to go something like 85mph over the next 10miles to make up for lost time. People don't typically do that, but it should highlight that getting stuck in slow traffic is far more detrimental to a person keeping a schedule than speeding can reasonably make up for. Slow drivers have a far more detrimental impact on safety and lost time than speeders do. I don't mind speeders, so long as they respect people doing the speed limit. they are free to risk a ticket all they like, but they have no right to get mad at me for doing the speed limit. but I fully understand if they get mad at me for going 5-10mph under the speed limit and holding them up needlessly. if you or anyone else can't handle driving the speed limit, then you shouldn't have a drivers license. If you just want to drive slow, then pull over periodically and let the rest of us pass you and stop impeding everyone else.
    1
  23. Civil Asset Forfeiture is 10000000000000% Unconstitutional.
    1
  24. yup
    1
  25. Can't be a DUI if you weren't DRIVING
    1
  26. 31 U.S. Code § 5103 "United States coins and currency (including Federal reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal reserve banks and national banks) are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues. Foreign gold or silver coins are not legal tender for debts." cash is legal tender. credit cards is private debt, not legal tender.
    1
  27.  @OccamsToaster  mom and pop shops have no issue accepting cash.
    1
  28.  @OccamsToaster  what's your complaint? do you have a point you're trying to make?
    1
  29. even if arrested, it does not prove you did anything wrong.
    1
  30.  @jefflangham5113  you're talking about a conviction. these people were not convicted of any crime, weren't even arrested.
    1
  31.  @meloniedropik3539  Nope, wouldn't bother me nor confuse me in the slightest. 1) I know what "Doctor" dos and doesn't mean. I hold numerous degrees myself, and spent 17yrs in the college system throughout my life. I know how things works. If I could live to be 200yrs old I have about 8 different PhD Thesis/Dissertation topics in 4 different fields of study I could pursue right now. 2) I'm smart enough to do my own research and double check things, read and understand scientific papers, etc. 3) I've proven rather good at staying up on the latest in health research and thus keeping myself healthy to the point of not needing to visit the hospital in the first place. "I highly doubt that you would like that to happen to you or a loved one. " that would never happen to me, as I'm not stupid, and I'd straighten them out in a hurry (my family). I don't associate with nor tolerate fools in my life. " We live in the US and need to follow conventions that are beneficial to the public even if it bruises our fragile egos." I agree, so medical doctors need to get off their high horses, get over their fragile egos and stop complaining that other Doctors use the title they have earned and have used since the dawn of the Doctoral degree's existence.
    1
  32. "It's tough catering to multiple types of crazy at once." so stop catering to vegans.....problem solved.
    1
  33. sales people working at car dealerships are scum.
    1
  34. still a fine, regardless what PC language you use
    1
  35. the whole point of the test drive is to make sure it works and you're not being sold a lemon.
    1
  36.  @jacuzzibusguy  takeoff and landing involves contact with the ground. the moment you're out of contact with teh ground, teh state and local govs have NO authority.
    1
  37. keep fixing it, it can be an "immortal" vehicle.
    1
  38. if you drive off the road and hit a pedestrian in the "right of way", is it the pedestrian's fault? Will the pedestrian be held responsible for paying for any and all damages to the vehicle?
    1
  39. Years ago a car dealership accidentally posted a price for a new 4dr Dodge Ram pickup at a ridiculously low price. My Sister and Brother In Law took the ad to the dealership and bought the truck. The dealer was forced to sell them the truck at the advertised price.
    1
  40. she's not a Navy officer.......so much for lawyers having basic accuracy skills.....
    1
  41.  @odesangel  Lawyers do care about the differences. A basic skill of a lawyer is accuracy. Knowing how to do Basic research.
    1
  42. i like the paid apprenticeship approach, I'd even be ok with more time in teh apprenticeship though (1-2yrs).
    1
  43. to fix it requires removing most of the regulations that exist that give gov power, and close the 3 letter gov agencies.
    1
  44. or a Muslim restaurant and ordering pork. or someone with severe shellfish allergy eating at an exclusively seafood restaurant.
    1
  45. and he flew low over a national Park, which likely has a 2000ft minimum altitude requirement by the FAA. and he stole private property. You can just fly over things and decide to take whatever you see.
    1
  46. civil asset forfeiture is unconstitutional!
    1
  47. are the individual employees that broke the law going to be punished?
    1
  48. legal to be drunk at "home" is it not?
    1
  49. sounds like it to me.
    1
  50. there is no law forcing you to run adds. but it costs money to own/operate a station, and so yo udo need to fun it somehow, even if that is just a rich person sinking money into it because they just hate adds that much.
    1