Comments by "Solo Renegade" (@SoloRenegade) on "John Stossel" channel.

  1. 1300
  2. 612
  3. 178
  4. 102
  5. 61
  6. 45
  7. 42
  8. 40
  9. 30
  10. 28
  11. 26
  12. 23
  13. 20
  14. 20
  15. 17
  16. 16
  17. 16
  18. 15
  19. 15
  20. 14
  21. 14
  22. 13
  23.  @hotdogg268  not at all. Often times burning more gas is the right answer. I am a CFI and one lesson I always taught to new Commercial Pilots was that of money. I'd ask them if it made more sense to fly a paying customer economically to save fuel, or to just pour it on and fly as fast as practical. They always answered to save gas and save the customer money. But them I'd ask them how much money they'd save by flying economically on a 2hr flight in a given airplane, vs going fast. They calculate the amount. And then I'd point out to them than the airplane costs more per hour to operate than the fuel it burns. And that time is money, and the customer will both save more money by burning the gas and flying faster, as well as be happy the flight took less of their time as well. If I'm saving energy, it has nothing to do with the environment and everything to do with spending less money on certain things, so I have more I can spend on things I actually care about. I avoid beachfront properties as they are overpriced and lack all the features that makes a property valuable to me. I don't eat bugs, but you're free to do so if you like. There is quite literally nothing I hate more than hypocrites. Something else I despise are morons like yourself that like to go after people for no reason. The kind of person who can't generate a coherent valid logical argument to save their lives. You obviously can't read. As your response is a direct contradiction to my first comment in this thread, in the context of the original post.
    13
  24. 11
  25. 11
  26. 11
  27. 10
  28. 9
  29. 9
  30. 9
  31. 8
  32. 8
  33. 8
  34. 8
  35. 8
  36. 8
  37. 8
  38. 8
  39. 6
  40. 6
  41. 5
  42. 5
  43. 5
  44. 5
  45. 4
  46. 4
  47. 4
  48. 4
  49. 4
  50. 4