Comments by "Solo Renegade" (@SoloRenegade) on "Zeihan on Geopolitics"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@twostop6895 I get that feds control interstae commerce, but the point is that it's not up to CA then either, and the feds can FORCE california's compliance.
But, CO, UT, AZ, NV all touch the water, and could drain it before it reaches the CA border, and thus the river would no longer exist on CA territory, and they'd no longer have claim to it.
While feds control some of this (but clearly are not, as they are leaving it to the states to work out on their own), the water does exist within the physically boundaries of the respective states. and so long as they draw only from their side of state boundaries, it's technically not interstate commerce. Especially for CO if they drew from the river upstream where its banks are solely within CO.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1