Comments by "Ggoddkkiller" (@ggoddkkiller1342) on "WarLeaks - Military Blog" channel.

Terrorists in Syria like isis or ypg use ATGMs almost at their maximum range so they could run away easier. While Ukrainian heroes use them at their minimum range, huge respect to them really!! Because this is defending a country that you don't shoot and run, rather you stay and fight until enemies or you are dead...
1
However there is some damage to civilian areas around including a factory and there are already damage videos circulating!! It is really a weird attack..
1
@Cartia6269 They have dead and wounded crew for sure, those ATGMs don't have heat warhead rather fragmentation warheads, often with steel balls. So that tank got penetrated from perhaps dozens of positions not just engine bay..
1
Terrorists in Syria like isis or ypg use ATGMs almost at their maximum range so they could run away easier. While Ukrainian heroes use them at their minimum range, huge respect to them really!! Because this is defending a country that you don't shoot and run, rather you stay and fight until enemies or you are dead...
1
@ΒΞΔΝ They were ''allowed'' which is why they had to use force and threathen the crew at gunpoint???? You are just ridiculous due in footage everything could be seen including even how the captain was circled by FOUR soldiers and physically threatened!!! If nobody died it isn't because wrong actions of German soldiers rather because Turkish crew didn't resist their illegal boarding otherwise there were many dead people and a huge international crisis now!! So German soldiers risked innocent lives for a ''suspicion'' and illegally boarded the ship while they must had followed the ship and if it indeed enters Libyan territorial waters then they could legally board it so your ''they waited 4 hours'' excuse doesn't make sense neither as in international laws there isn't such a thing as ''after 4 hours ships can be boarded without permission''!!! This is just piracy, nothing else and if German government doesn't respond correctly next thing you know Turkey is boarding ships in international waters because they suspect ''drug/human trafficking'' and i bet you people will cry as ''against international laws and piracy'' even if you tried to defend this incident somehow despite the fact there is absolutely NO difference between those incidents!! operation Irini only covers Libyan territorial waters for boarding operations not international waters as it would be against international laws and this is why German soldiers ran away when Turkey didn't allow their illegal search and sent warships...
1
@ΕυάγγελοςΠλεξίδας What is ''ANCLOS2'' you meant ''UNCLOS section 2''??? For a person who knows international laws ''very well'' you can't even write it's name correctly nor share a source to prove this is really an international law rather than a BS you fabricated!! So i have to ask from you ''international law expert'' writing it's name correctly or sharing a source...
1
@ΕυάγγελοςΠλεξίδας Ohh finally you could write the name correctly instead of ''ANCLOS2'' and even if you couldn't even write a single word correctly you kept arguing that im using you as a ''search tool'', LMAO!! Anyway if we return to the original subject you ''international law expert'' must learn AS SOON AS POSSIBLE that UN Conventions like UNCLOS are only binding if BOTH SIDES are signed it!!! For example Germany was searching a Greek ship then UNCLOS would be binding and Germany could legally board the Greek ship but did Turkey sign UNCLOS??? NOPE, same as United States of America, Israel etc so Germany had absolutely no right to board that ship without taking permission from it's captain but ofc you ''international law experts'' are no experts at all rather extremely ignorant people so you could somehow miss this fact :))
1
@ΕυάγγελοςΠλεξίδας I always assumed you ''genius'' were talking about UNCLOS section 2 or something due UNCLOS II (I really hope you ''genius'' will finally learn how it is written) aka the second conference on the law of the sea did not result in any new agreements so no country signed anything at all in 1960 while you ''genius'' are claiming Turkey accepted it somehow, LMAO!! I guess i have to explain to you ''international law expert'' conferences nor votes in UN level doesn't mean A DAMN THING at all until there is actually an agreement and countries also sign it so UNCLOS II isn't an international law rather it is only another failed UN conference and it's articles are NOT binding for Turkey nor any other country!! Seriously your kind of ignorant people constantly talk about international laws while in reality you don't even know the difference between a conference and international laws, what a moronity...
1