Comments by "justgivemethetruth" (@justgivemethetruth) on "Rebel HQ" channel.

To be fair to Joe Biden ... there is no fixing that people built in a lot of areas they knew were bad. If we bail them all out, how is that fair to the taxpayers, or force insurance companies to pay for them - that means all the other customers who built their houses in safe place now have to pay through their premiums to fix these other people's houses - a huge cost. So, they typical half-assed minimum will likely get done and some lucky people get saved and others will lose everything. or get minor support.
1
The idea than an asshole from the asshole state of Kentucky is ripping the USA apart and making a mockery of our Constitution for the last 5 years at least is an ourrage. Kentucky is one of the most backwards states full of corruption, and McConnell is right in the center of it.
1
The problem with nuclear power has always been the human factors and the economics in its design and maintenance. I think it would be much less expensive and safe to run the nuclear power industry through the government, possible connected to NASA or even DARPA while funding other technology, such that safety and redundancy was the issue, not profit. Cutting building, training and salary costs to funnel profits to some investors who are not even local most of the time and do not care about how the plants are run is the problem. But I have to say unless people are satisfied about safety and the costs I'd be happier doing nothing with nuclear rather than giving it to the private capitalists to screw and put us all in danger.
1
Hard to find a Trump supporter with a brain cell between them ... ugh, what a bunch of mental deficients.
1
Venezuela is not socialist, it is more or less military rule by the army who put and kept Hugo Chavez in power, who did have some ideas about fairness in his country to education and help the people ... if you call that socialist, he had some socialist policies, but real socialist involves real democracy.
1
3:38 - "Oh, really" ... in response to the idea that socialism means that you get paid the same flipping burgers as you do if you get a degree. Hahahaha ... that's hilarious. I don't wish evil on any particular person, but I am not unhappy that most of these idiots interviewed will be dead of old age or dead from being unhealthy, and just plain stupid very soon.
1
lots of people like you have seen the thorium video and are suddenly willing to believe the hype through re-branding.
1
@jb678901 This issue is not going to won by scientists' or engineer's claims. You guys who work for nuclear, coal or oil companies have proven over and over again that you lie, cost-cut and cannot be trusted to do anything but support the claims of your companies. That is virtually always the answer of scientists who have wrecked their brand and blown their image ... we know all this stuff, and everyone else has to go back and study it. Yet the designs are not open and the criticisms are not published. They should be, nuclear and energy technology companies in general have a lot to do to fix their images before anyone is going to trust them again. Here is the problem with the nuclear industry, thorium or uranium or whatever ... https://youtu.be/H6mhw-CNxaE?t=964
1
@MS-ev6bd You have to be at least fair when you talk about nuclear power. If I remember right Hanford was one of the places where they made material for the early bombs, and the contamination around it is very old because they did not even think about such things back then. It is a toxic environmental mess that can take up to 100 billion to remediate, from Michael Lewis's recent book The Fifth Risk. But nuclear is much different today than then. I don't know if companies behave any more responsibly though, that is the issue for me.
1
@MS-ev6bd Dead loved ones? Prove it.
1
I'm not sure they are drunk, they may just have lead poisoning and type 2 diabetes.
1
exactly, there is the real root cause of our problem
1
This guy is being dishonest about the disaster of Fukushima. There were workers that went in there working that got lethal doses of radiation, but they had to go in and do the world because no one else could. We never heard a damn thing about those workers. I support bringing nuclear back under strictly controlled conditions - non-profit, run by the government, but one of the things that needs to happen is it should be open, the public should get all the data on the operations, and they need to be strictly regulated.
1
Biden's memory is OK. He is just a deliberate guy that thinks about what he says ... maybe too much. I'm not a Biden guy, but let's see where things go before eviscerating candidates please ... we may have to support him. That means we have to get everyone out to vote for another Hillary Clinton, which is what Progressives said was the failure last time. So, put away your damn daggers and mellow out.
1
good job
1
HEY ---- where is the link to the whole CNN's climate crisis town hall ??
1
The other thing about a lot of this is that radiation is not well understood by people. There are several things to think about. 1. The radiation from for example, uranium, is different from its chemical toxicity. Uranium is a heavy metal like lead, and we know what lead does from the Flint water crisis. Uranium chemically is toxic to people if they get it on or in their bodies, as separate from the radioativity. 2. When they say that something has a very-long half life, that means it is not giving off that much radiation, it decays slowly. Think of a big tank with a hole in it. The amount of radiation is the water inside. If the water is leaking from a small hole, it has a long half-life A water leak is different from radiation because it is linear pretty much and radiation is exponential. 3. When they say something is very radioactive, it means it is giving off a lot of radiation, and decays fast. That is why the half-life is likely to be short. For some elements that can mean seconds. 4. Then there is the effect on the human body of radiation. This is still not that well understood, or at least publicly explained. There is radiation from radioactive stuff outside your body, and there is radiation from radioactive stuff inside your body. For example iodine from fallout lands in a field and a cow eats the grass and that grass is turned into milk and a human drinks it and it is absorbed into possible causing some common cancers: Adrenal cancer risk is especially high in people who had the medullary type of thyroid cancer. Patients treated with radioactive iodine also have an increased risk of acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), stomach cancer, and salivary gland cancer. Nuclear is not the total disaster we all have been led to believe. I say that not because I take it lightly, there is a huge global mess to clean up from careless and incompetent use and handling of radiactive materials, but it can be handled safely.
1
This is very significant ... Warren hit it out of the ballpark ... now she has to get it visible and passed. She is great for this effort.
1
God, that eyeful of blood is sad. What a lousy time for something like that to happen. I don't know you can blame the guy or say he has bad health. I've had a nosebleed at inopportune moments, it was nothing but a nosebleed - except it's like the end of the world when it happens.
1
Emma made a simple and powerful observation, is that the Trump voter is motivated by emotion. I think the opposition, Bernie, Democrats, whomever need to drill in on that and figure out what are the dynamics of the emotions of a Trump voter. From the way they talk it has to do with feeling like Trump is going to cut through and things they think are important, and also it is a kind of bullying or they're going to show us all. So, how do we get through that, how do we deflate that? It is held in place by the idea that they also cannot bear being wrong again, or being fooled, like they obviously were or have been in the past, maybe even by Democrats.
1