Comments by "Markus Müller" (@markusmuller6173) on "ShanghaiEye魔都眼"
channel.
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be adapted to current global needs!
Let's abolish the veto for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only states of the UN Security Council already have armies that could be deployed within the framework of a international task force coordinated by the UN for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such as: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, western Iran), DR Congo, eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to the choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a contested region must of course also offer the possibility of completely self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition like that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia .... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we really only admire those "representatives" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people reward good individual suggestions for fair dispute resolution again (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
4
-
@Tortuosit If you would like to discuss German foreign policy, I recommend that you do so under "German Chancellor Scholz urges unity in New Year's Eve address | DW News". I also posted a comment there.- But it was Russia and China who vetoed a protective intervention in favor of Ukraine at the UNSC. - Therefore: The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority.
Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas:
Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Or do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts?
As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Those who support fair peace demand: The regulations of the UN Security Council and its quorum can and must be urgently adapted to current global needs!
Abolish the veto right for all cross-border aggressors and lower the yes-quorum for sending a peacekeeping mission to a 2/3 majority. Not only UN Security Council states already have armies that could be deployed as part of a short-term UN-coordinated task force for fair referendums (plebiscites) in disputed crisis areas such like: Kurdistan (Northern Syria, Western Iran), DR Congo, Eastern Ukraine, Jammu and Kashmir, Nagorno-Karabakh (Central Armenia & Azerbaijan), Western China (Tibet and Xinjiang), Palestine, Southern Morocco (Western Sahara)...
In addition to a choice between two or more competing states, fair referendums in a disputed region must, of course, also offer the possibility of fully self-determined sovereignty. (A state transition such as that from Yugoslavia to Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia.... - or from Czechoslovakia to the Czech Republic and Slovakia).
Do we only admire those "representatives of the people" whose administration favors bloody conflicts? As soon as people again honor good proposals of individuals for fair settlement of disputes (and compare, discuss and select corresponding improved regulations), we will be able to climb the next rung on the evolutionary ladder.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4