Comments by "Orlanzo" (@orlanzo2621) on "WatchMojo.com" channel.

  1. Patriarca Bullshit man. Explain DD2’s “variety” over SOR2 besides making jumps across moving platforms. Big deal. Sorry but that type of “variety” means nothing compared to ACTUAL variety, as in gameplay mechanics and multiple characters that actually have their own individual special moves and strengths and weaknesses. The DD games are the “grandfather” of the genre but that doesn’t make them the best. Games like SOR2 are clearly a league above the series period. Oh yea DD3 is complete garbage 🗑 and shouldn’t even be mentioned here and SDD is mediocre. Neither have more variety than SOR2.
    1
  2. Patriarca Your argument is terrible because you’re basically saying almost all beat em ups are “trash” except the DD games just because they have platforming...that’s ridiculous man. I’m pretty sure most people don’t consider SOR2, TMNT, Alien vs Predator, FF, etc “trash”. You’re just being the ultimate DD fanboy right now man,lol. Sorry but you just have to face the fact that those games have long been surpassed in the genre. DD is a good series overall but none of those games are considered the very best in the genre.
    1
  3. Patriarca The “King”....riiiight. The “king” with very basic/limited gameplay mechanics, basically one playable character (since Billy and Jimmy are completely identical), and slow gameplay. Lol. You’re like the only person in the world that think DD2 is the best game in the genre. And By “variety” you clearly meant the platforming man, you said that 99% of beat em ups are trash because they are just walk forward and press punch. Your words not mine. Lol. But yea the truth is that DD2 is good for it’s time period but is archaic when compared to games that came after it like SOR2.
    1
  4. Patriarca Let’s see in SOR2 each character has their own individual specials, the ability to do front and back grapples, do double team attacks, drop attacks, rear attacks, different throws depending on if you’re front or back grappling the enemy, throw escapes, etc. What can you do in DD2? Punch, kick, and grab. Oh yea and your two specials that are identical between Jimmy and Billy...and you want to talk about “variety”. No contest man, just stop the bias and the foolishness. Lmao.
    1
  5. Patriarca Yea DD2 is, of course, one of the very first beat em up games after its prequel. The genre was still very new at the time and didn’t know what it wanted to be. So I think that’s why the game has so many platforming sections in it. That definitely doesn’t make it better in the least tho. It slows the game down even more and honestly takes AWAY from the experience. They eventually figured that out which is why you don’t see platforming in later beat em up games.
    1
  6. Patriarca LMAO yea ok buddy....suuuure. Anyone with an actual functioning brain can tell you that SOR2 has FAR more combat options and mechanics than DD2. Man you’re so biased it’s sad actually man. In SOR2 you can start a combo, then go into a throw from that combo or go into a variety of special moves, or flip behind the enemy, etc. You DON’T have those kind of gameplay options in DD2, stop it man. I know the game like the back of my hand. Stop lying. 😂. You’re just straight up lying at this point. DD2 is VERY rudimentary and basic when it comes to its combat. That’s a FACT. It was one of the first best em up games so of course it’s going to be limited compared to most of what came after it. You’re literally arguing against a FACT. I just named everything you can do combat wise in SOR2, DD2 has none of that. Not to mention the controls are terrible compared to SOR2. You literally have to flip your punch and kick buttons when you turn the opposite direction. 😂. Man if you prefer DD2 and how basic, vanilla, and limited it is to SOR2 that’s fine. Just say that. But please don’t sit here and try to pretend that it somehow has more gameplay options because it’s a literal fact it doesn’t. Anyone who has played both games will tell you you’re flat out lying. Lmao
    1
  7. Patriarca And I’m not talking about just DD games. I know they still somewhat have platforming. But I’m talking about other popular series like SOR and FF, they NEVER use platforming and neither do most other beat em ups, and for good reason: it sucks in a beat em up type of game. It slows things down and takes away from what a beat em up is supposed to be about: fighting, going around destroying as many enemies as possible. THAT’S what the genre is, it’s NOT about trying to make sure you’re lined up perfectly to make tricky jumps over logs or disappearing platforms.
    1
  8. Patriarca Explain. Explain WHY DD2 has more “combat” options than SOR2. You haven’t given any examples. I basically gave you a rundown of what you can do in both games combat wise and proved WHY SOR2 has more variety in combat mechanics. You have yet to do that man, you’re just repeating that DD2 somehow has more options without anything to back it up. I’ve already explained why SOR2 is more advanced and has far more fighting options than DD2.
    1
  9. Patriarca No man, platformers are platformers and beat em ups are beat em ups. Beat em ups don’t need platforming in them to be good games, many many games have proved that. You’re still trying to hang on to the fact that because DD has platforming it somehow gives it an upper hand against SOR, sorry, it doesn’t. Most people don’t want to be jumping over platforms and rotating conveyor belts with spikes below them that lead to instant death in a beat em up.
    1
  10. Patriarca I’ll end it on these actual facts man: SOR2 is faster SOR2 plays smoother SOR2 has more combat options/moves (look at any movelist of both games as proof) SOR2 has FAR more character variety (4 playable characters vs 1) SOR2 has better controls SOR2 has more depth (due to more playable characters and moves) Now you can argue against those all you want man but they are all factual statements, not opinions. I know you’ll try to argue it but it’s just the truth man lol.
    1
  11. Patriarca LOL....what you just mentioned is completely basic compared to the myriad of options you have in SOR2 man. Not to mention Max alone has several different grabs/holds depending on his positioning. Billy and Jimmy have the exact same basic, vanilla moveset while in SOR2 each of the FOUR characters have their own unique movesets that give them their own unique feel and strategies, that one fact alone kills your entire argument of DD2 having more gameplay options. That’s entirely untrue. But I get you’re a DD2 fanboy man. I get it. Nothing will ever convince you/prove to you that SOR2 is light years ahead of it Lol.
    1
  12. Patriarca Level design is “better” because you have to line up to jump over logs, spikes, and disappearing platforms that lead to instant death?? Lmao. Man you’re hilarious. You just can’t admit you’re wrong. These are beat em up games, not super Mario or Sonic. That’s irrelevant and like I stated before that actually hurts the game, not make it better. SOR2 is a (much) better game. Just face the reality.
    1
  13. Patriarca You’re completely out of your mind man. Lmao. The different throws in SOR2 have different uses and do different amounts of damage, the special moves are all completely different for each character and again, have their own specific uses, and also AGAIN you’re trying to fall back on DD having crappy platforming that lead to instant death in a BEAT EM UP as some kind of proof that it has better level design. It DOESNT. So again like I said you’re trying to pretend that DD2 is “better” just because of that and it’s NOT. It’s WORSE because of it. It’s a detriment to the game. Once again you’re trying to say almost all beat Em ups are trash because they don’t have DD’s terrible platforming and sorry but that’s just dumb man and extremely biased. Oh yea, more options>less options any day of the week. You’re straight up delusional man, you need help. Lol
    1
  14. Patriarca And trying to pretend that beat em ups are dead because of all time classics like SOR, FF, etc is completely laughable and ridiculous. Well enjoy your slow, basic, vanilla, terrible platforming “beat em up” and I’ll enjoy a much better game. LOL.
    1
  15. Patriarca Whstever you say buddy....whatever you say, lmao. Most people completely disagree with you. Look up any best beat em up list and see where SOR2 ranks compared to DD2, lol. You’re definitely in your own world on that one. Oh and I’ve beaten the shadow master more times than I can count, I don’t have trouble with the game, lmao. I’m just pointing out the obvious, the platforming slows down the game and has no place in the genre. Beat em ups don’t need cumbersome platforming, they are BEAT EM UPs, and it doesn’t add “variety” I’ll leave you with the actual irrefutable facts one more time. SOR is a faster game with more moves, smoother gameplay, more replayability due to more characters, better controls, more depth, oh and it’s not just move to the right and press punch. There are plenty of enemies that actually block and you have to use your brain against. (Like R Bear) the enemies as a whole have more abilities and are more dynamic in SOR2 than in DD2, just like the the main cast compared to Billy and Jimmy. Not to mention there’s more variety in enemies period. https://kb.speeddemosarchive.com/Double_Dragon_II https://strategywiki.org/wiki/Streets_of_Rage_2/Moves_and_controls Yea you tell me which one has more depth in combat. Lmao. You’re so damn biased man. You live in a fantasy world. 😂. But yea whatever man. Lol
    1
  16. +shrek187 damn, I didn't think anyone else has really played martial masters. Great game man, the graphics and animation are on par with the sf 3 series easily. Its criminal how overlooked that game is, along with Asura Blade, Asura Buster, and breakers revenge.
    1
  17. +maman89 Great game, that along with Asura Blade and Asura Buster are some of the best overlooked fighters out there, its a shame. But yea I think the problem is that its not known enough to be forgotten in the first place.
    1
  18. +Bojidar AMV you know nothing about street fighter, at all. Street fighter is definetly not about spamming anything. street fighter is all about footsies, spacing, timing, and knowing what to do and when to do it. You have to be able to think quickly. You must play against scrubs, and in that case all fighting games are spamfest. MK is for casual players who like easy combos and like to mash. Oh and who are excited by blood and gore flying all over the screen thinking that makes it a "great" game.
    1
  19. ***** well you are watching and playing the wrong people man...trust Me,lol. High level street fighter play is about footsies, patience, execution,and combos.....NOT spamming.
    1
  20. +Decapre exactly man,lol.
    1
  21. +AdiXeR3 Exactly man, my thoughts exactly.
    1
  22. NJHS92 Dead or Alive is a button masher man, and so is soul calibur to a degree. those games are nowhere near as good as street fighter, in my opinion...but anyway, thats another topic. I was just saying you must have never played any other 2D fighters, because they have the same blocking mechanic as street fighter. I know those games you mentioned have block buttons, but they are 3d fighters, so thats understandable, it works better for a game like that. But not so much for a 2d one. Street Fighter, King of Fighters, Marvel vs Capcom series, guilty gear, those kinds of games are what im talking about man. 
    1
  23. I honestly can’t stand her. I think she’s trash and one of the worst additions to the series. Lol
    1
  24. keep telling yourself that. lol
    1
  25. ***** Lol....man everything you just said only proves my point, which is that MK is more for kids and geared toward casual fans. Sf is far and away superior and always has been,the games are deeper, more rewarding, more refined, and more satisfying.Its for the serious more hardcore fighting fan. In a FIGHTING game, the FIGHTING is what matters most. Not how many costumes or modes or story. Those are added bonuses, but the gameplay is the main thing you go by when judging a game, especially a fighting game.Its what keeps people coming back, think about it, why do people still play Third Strike, Super Turbo, Alpha 3,CVS2 and all of these other capcom fighting games that are decades old? The gameplay, thats why, not a story mode or costumes,lol. No one still playes the old MK games on a competitive level....gee i wonder why?? In that regard MK has never compared to street fighter, honestly KOF is a lot better franchise than Mk and truly rivals SF, but of course MK gets all the recognition it gets because its got blood and fatalities,ect ect.
    1
  26. ***** Exactly man. Everyone likes DBZ,lol. Street Fighter has always been rated "T for Teen" but there are just as many adults who play it as well as teens maybe more these days because our generation was the one growing up on it and now that we are adults we still play it. Kids these days honestly dont really play street fighter like that. They are more into first person shooters,GTA, or garbage like minecraft.
    1
  27. Uhh no. There’s way more than 10 characters man. Lol
    1
  28. +Jeffrey Dotson great series man, one of my favorites. But its not really "forgotten", heck they had a game on the xbox 360 a few years ago...it sucked but hey,lol.
    1
  29. cokde perdana exactly man, its all about graphics nowadays. That's all these companies, and sadly a lot of gamers as well, care about now. Its no longer about how fun a game is but how good it looks.
    1
  30. Man......no, just no. explain street fighters "shitty controls". Mk is the one thats stiff, clunky, and completely casual friendly. SF's gameplay has always been smooth as butter and much deeper than any MK game.Its the reason why its constantly the most played game at EVO while MK gats forgotten about. Third Strike alone destroys any MK game ever released. And your MK 2 example is horrible.,lmao. The game literally cheats, it reads your inputs, you HAVE to exploit it to beat it. Thats NOT good game programming and has ZERO to do with "strategy" its just shitty programming from people who had no idea what they were doing. Street fighters AI has always been competent but fair, because you know, they actually knew how to program AI. Lol.
    1
  31. wafflcoptr​ man you have no idea what you're talking about. Oh so is that why just about every other fighting game of the 90's used street fighters control scheme and literally no one used mortal kombats?? Having a block button in a 2d fighting game is retarded. It kills the flow of the game. Having every single character use the same normals for example, punches, kicks, uppercuts, ect, with the only difference being special moves(as the first 3 or4 games did) is retarded and lame, having AI that literally cheats extensively and that you have to exploit is retarded. Man the only one biased here is you clearly. You're such an MK fan that you're blind to what's wrong with the series. There's a reason hardly no one else followed MK's style but every fighting game of the 90s was trying to be a street fighter clone. And yes I've played MK many times, its not nearly as deep as street fighter, that's not an opinion that's a fact. Even other MK fans have admitted that. Honestly the ONLY reason the series even became popular was because of the blood, it needed a gimmick. Street fighter only ever needed its deep engaging gameplay to to keep people coming back for more. For that reason alone street fighter is superior. 
    1
  32. wafflcoptr LOL....thats your argument??. No son, you take this L and go to your room,lol. MK isnt nearly as deep as street fighter, especially the early ones like MK2, how can a game be deep when every character has the same walking speed, same animations for all normals with special moves being the only difference between characters, and in single player the computer literally cheats?? Street Fighter does not have shitty controls, as ive just proven to you why, if the contols were so "shitty" then why did everyone else choose to copy them and try to emulate the playstyle?? Why do tons of people still play the old games competitively while the old MK games rot?? You literally have no argument, lmao. Youre sad dude, and in denial.You cant even form an actually argument to the contrary. Go play your stiff,clunky, block button using gimmick fighting game.Leave street fighter to people who know how to play it. The only reason you think street fighters controls suck is probably because you suck ass at it.
    1
  33. wafflcoptr Games now STILL use sf2 as a basis for their control layout and general systems, hell even the special moves are imitated and inspired other games, the series is classic and timeless......who's trying to copy MK?? oh yea, no one...gee i wonder why? lmao. Take this big platinum L and go home man. You have no idea what youre talking about and probably hardly know anything about fighting games in general as i can tell from your comments about street fighter having "shitty" controls when MK uses commands like UP UP LK,which is throughly retarded lol.
    1
  34. then whats this then on kung lao's movelist??? take the L and go home kid before u get hurt,lmao.
    1
  35. eternal champions and last blade should have been on the list instead of clay fighters and time killers.....those games were forgotten for a reason, they suck.
    1
  36. Tieria Daniels Yea I remember both of those too, man T.I ended Lil Flips career. Shawty Lo was always garbage.
    1
  37. +PikaKipzLikesGaming pfffft....dhalsim has never been that great man,seriously? He was only good in sf2,lol. Rain and Noob Saibot in MKT were completely and utterly broken.
    1
  38. Nope, just fans of a real fighting game, not a blood and gore simulator.
    1
  39. Mekiel Hester it was up to the players skill as to what kind of combo you could create. Not random button presses. Theres a reason why most fighting games use the "street fighter style" commands for moves and their combo system as opposed to mks, it just doesn't work as well and makes u feel limited and fixed as in what u could do. The creativity wasn't there. But hey, to each their own.
    1
  40. +shrek187 It came to the U.S man, I had it. It sucked,lol. But yea I love the older games in the series.
    1
  41. shrek187 Yea it was horrible shrek, just horrible,lol. They took away most of their special moves and tried to make it play like soul caliber but it just failed. I think a lot of people just pretend it doesn't exist,lol.
    1
  42. get off the internet,lmao.
    1
  43. +Alvaro Alas Gill, Oro, Garuda, Kairi, Evil Ryu, Akuma, M bison, and probably others can defeat scorpion man....hes not all that. Hes just immortal. That doesn't mean he cant lose a fight.
    1
  44. Alvaro Alas What youre saying makes no sense man,lol. People like street fighter for its FIGHTING ENGINE, its GAMEPLAY, how it FEELS. Fireballs don't make street fighter, but blood and gore made Mk what it is today. You cant deny those facts man.  
    1
  45. Alvaro Alas Lol, wow man, really mature. That's your argument? I guess that's what I should expect from an immature Mk fan. Well anyway this is going nowhere, people like what they like.
    1
  46. Alvaro Alas No youre wrong man, Sf needs none of that, that's not why people like it. Sf 2 had no "flashy finishers" and people loved it. You know why? Because it was fun to play. People like sf games because of how smooth they are, the combo system, the depth, the different types of characters, (charge, grappler, rushdown, shoto, hybrid) where as mk only has 2 types of characters really, rushdown and zoning,it has awkward animations, stiff controls, and a mediocre fighting engine. Oh yea and blood....which is the only reason people even pay attention to it. Other fighter games don't need it to get attention, while mk does.
    1
  47. chanditha mahanama This guy has no clue about sf man.I can tell just by talking to him. And I don't hate Mk, I enjoy it for what it is,grew up playing both, but yea its not on street fighters level. Never has been.
    1
  48. Alvaro Alas Sorry man, but more adults play street fighter than Mk. Always have. Its a much harder game to learn and kids rather flock to the flashy blood and gore od Mk. Sf takes dedication.
    1
  49. Alvaro Alas Now I KNOW you have no idea what youre talking about, Street Fighter is most certainly not button mashing, try it and see what happens. MK IS a button masher, if u mash in street fighter nothing will happen trust me, you would just get your ass kicked backwards forwards and sideways. Mk takes no kind of freaking dedication, are u kidding me? The combos are easy, and the fatalities are nothing at all, that's not even part of the gameplay, its just some lame crap you do after the person is already defeated,a freaking cutscene. and x rays are 2 buttons pressed together. man please just stop.
    1
  50. Alvaro Alas And Mk is more popular with kids because they think its "forbidden" and it has blood, and gore, and "kool" edgy characters. And oh yea its extremely easy to play. They don't have the patience or dedication to be good at street fighter. They cant learn 1 frame links, chains, footsies, how to properly use focus or red focus, option selects, or any of that so yea youre most definetly wrong. Mk is WAAAY more masher friendly.
    1