Comments by "" (@RedXlV) on "The Damage Report" channel.

  1. Yang's only good idea is UBI, and he even gets that wrong by saying it should replace existing welfare programs instead of supplementing them.
    1
  2. The way to "Make America Great Again" is by tossing Trump and his minions in prison.
    1
  3.  @dbjames9715  There's nothing dumb about suggesting Bernie drop out. This is not remotely similar to the 2008 primary. In 2008, it was the closest primary race that America has ever seen. It was neck and neck all the way to the end. In this year's primary, Biden has blown Sanders out.
    1
  4.  @peopleschampgarage7869  Trump is the senile creeper. Go to hell.
    1
  5. @Brady Fries It's the conservative Reich that's dying.
    1
  6. @Brady Fries Nope.
    1
  7. @Brady Fries The "leftists rioting and looting" bullshit.
    1
  8.  @andrewmartin6095  If you think Biden is "very far right" then Bernie would be center-right at best compared to you.
    1
  9.  @robertTUBEbrazeau  No, it was not rigged. And exit polls do not show Sanders "as the current leader by far". Whoever told you that's what the exit polls show was lying to you.
    1
  10.  @andrewmartin6095  I'm not in any way saying "what was reported by exit polls are lies". I'm saying that the exit polls don't show that Bernie should've won any of the states that he lost.
    1
  11.  @andrewmartin6095  There haven't been any such a discrepancies in the exit polls. https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/no-huge-red-flag-that-fraud-occurred-in-mass-primary/ Also, I'm not sure where the "4% is considered proof of election rigging by the UN" came from. But it doesn't really matter, because there is no such discrepancies in the Democratic primary exit polls.
    1
  12.  @andrewmartin6095  Where does the UN say that 4% is proof of fraud? Most exit polls have a margin of error larger than 4% anyway, so that figure sounds fake. And what makes a random blogger more credible than Factcheck.org?
    1
  13.  Trigger Troll  You're a reality denier.
    1
  14. John and Ben know that. They're just lying about it to forward their "establishment Democrats are terrible" narrative.
    1
  15. An agreement with Russia is worth less than a pile of shit. At least the pile of shit can be used for compost.
    1
  16. Why? She has literally no qualifications.
    1
  17.  @zepps88  No, Turner has never been in the US Senate.
    1
  18.  @zepps88  A single term in a state senate doesn't strike me as sufficient qualification to be VP.
    1
  19. We don't have proportional representation at all.
    1
  20. No matter how desperately you want to believe Tara Reade, her lies are quite obvious.
    1
  21.  @andrewclifton429  Maybe you've missed it, but Reade has no admitted that she she didn't file a complaint about sexual harrassment. https://www.chicagotribune.com/election-2020/ct-tara-reade-joe-biden-complaint-20200502-c5bizwzivzgafl5tpcyn55ypdu-story.html And you also seem to have missed that it would be impossible for any complaint she filed to have ended up in Biden's personal papers. That's not how it works and you know it.
    1
  22.  @andrewclifton429  Also, the fact that you think it's somehow completely implausible that she could lie is quite telling.
    1
  23.  @andrewclifton429  How on Earth could any complaint filed with the Senate against Biden have ended up in Biden's personal papers? That's utterly ludicrous, and you should know it.
    1
  24.  @andrewclifton429  If a complaint had been filed, that complaint wouldn't go to the person who the complaint was against. If the complaint existed, it would be in the National Archives. It's not, because it doesn't exist.
    1
  25.  @andrewclifton429  Delaware has made it clear that they don't have any personnel files. The National Archives have not said any such thing. And if Reade actually filed a complaint, it would be in the National Archives. If it's not there, it's because it doesn't exist.
    1
  26.  @andrewclifton429  The claim that there even are "mysteriously missing personnel files" is something that you seem to have made up on your own.
    1
  27. This is disingenuous bullshit. Literally arguing that Bernie should stay in the race because "maybe Biden will die of coronavirus". Also, the 2008 primary was the closest in American history. Hillary arguing against the suggestion she should drop out made sense when the outcome was very much in doubt right up until the final day. The 2020 primary is not close. Bernie is losing by even wider margins than he did in 2016. Which was also not a close race. There's a big difference between staying a race in when you still have a 50/50 chance of winning, and staying in when it would take a literal miracle for you to win.
    1
  28.  Kilal Googlestaffers  LMAO, her "body count". Are you a 9/11 truther too? Or a Birther? A moon landing denier? Or maybe you think coronavirus was created in a bioweapon lab? Which other bullshit conspiracy theories do you buy into?
    1
  29.  Kilal Googlestaffers  The "murder" of Gaddafi? And let me get this straight. Hillary Clinton is responsible for the deaths in Libya because the US set up a no-fly zone to make sure the rebels could win. But she's also responsible for the deaths in Syria, because the US didn't set up a no-fly zone to make sure the rebels would win?
    1
  30. Validating Republican lies would be what's "self-disqualifying".
    1
  31. You mean like how Bernie "stuck around" even after he'd already lost, and lobbied the superdelegates to overturn the primary and annoint him as the nominee?
    1
  32. What liars like you leave out is when that global cooling will happen. It's going to be in around 30,000 years.
    1
  33.  @Starrynight_13  You deserve a slap in the face if you're going to help Trump remain in power.
    1
  34. So if the press wasn't around to record it, that means it didn't happen? You Trumptards are a joke.
    1
  35.  @bipolarbear9917  No, lunatic, it is not "highly suspicious" that another candidate is getting more votes than Bernie. Maybe you're new to this whole "democracy" thing, but sometimes the candidate with the best ideas still gets fewer votes.
    1
  36. Trump's reasons for supporting Rittenhouse are complete and utter bullshit. How was was Rittenhouse being aggressive? By aiming his rifle at unarmed protesters, that's how. And backing up while still pointing a rifle at people is not the same thing as "running away". The reason people were trying to take the rifle away from is that there's no way to subdue an active shooter while letting him keep his gun.
    1
  37.  @georgewahogo7568  How do you "keep a safe distance" from a person with a rifle? An AR-15 has an effective range over around 300 yards. It kind of takes a while to get that far away from a shooter, and you can't outrun a bullet. And they had no reason to think he would stop shooting if they fled from him.
    1
  38.  @Glimmmerra  The gaslighting is on the part of Hamfists Man, with his nonsense claim about "DNC rigging of the election".
    1
  39.  @jacobw446  No, Jacob, you're still wrong. A republic simply means not a monarchy. There are many republics that are dictatorships. Voting for a representative = representative democracy. For example, Britain is not a republic. It's a monarchy. But British people still vote for their representatives. Same for Canada, Australia, and Japan, to name a few.
    1
  40.  @jacobw446  The EC subjugates the MAJORITY OF THE PEOPLE to minority rule by the small population states. That is tyranny of the minority. That is dictatorship. Also, your math is completely wrong. It would take the 11 largest states, not 4, to produce a majority of the population.
    1
  41.  @jacobw446  Are you perhaps familiar with the People's Republic of China and the Islamic Republic of Iran? Those are republics. And dictatorships. Another example that previously existed was the Soviet Union. A republic is defined by the fact that the head of state is not a hereditary monarch. The definition you're using for republic actually refers to a "representative democracy". You also don't seem to grasp what "direct vote" means. Electing the President via popular vote is not "direct vote", because the President is an elected representative. "Direct vote" would mean that laws are passed by referendum rather than by Congress.
    1
  42.  @jacobw446  Right now, the bigger states are enslaved by the smaller ones.
    1
  43.  @jacobw446  You keep using the word "republic" without any clue as to what it actually means.
    1
  44.  @jacobw446  You've repeatedly made it clear you don't know what a republic is. And the electoral college is not liberty. It's the tyranny of the minority.
    1
  45.  @jacobw446  None of them recognized the threat of tyranny of the minority. And Hans von Spakovsky, an official at the far-right Heritage Foundation, can go to hell. He was only able to be placed on the Federal Election Commission by a recess appointment, because he was too extreme to be confirmed by the Senate.
    1
  46.  @jacobw446  You keep asking that irrelevant question. States don't have any choice of leaving the union.
    1
  47. Ukraine should have a say in that, shouldn't they? The Ukrainian people would mostly rather Russia have nothing to do with Ukraine.
    1
  48. Young people are not "immune" to COVID-19, get serious.
    1
  49. None of that is true. And I would favor the death penalty for anti-vaxxers. Because anti-vax is murder.
    1
  50. You're a lunatic.
    1